Kalamazoo shooter....a "progressive" Left wing tears are flowing...not a rightwinger..again...

[JoeB131]

Thanks to another poster...we have this new piece of info.

From Stevemcgarret.....

"Progressive" Jason Brian Dalton Arrested for Random Kalamazoo Shootings After Killing 6 - Was Uber Driver - The Gateway Pundit

It says he worked for Progressive, not that he was a progressive... but never mind, I don't expect you read your own manifesto.

This guy is clearly one of yours. White, overweight, bad haircut.

 

[Disgruntled_American]

Tell us, what makes you so afraid of strict gun control? Others have that and still have freedom. What are you do damn worried about?

People like you who are willing to incinerate 90 million of us because you disagree politically. Socialists are all too quick to chose that method for conflict resolution. We had to deal with your kind in WW2.

1. I'm a liberal, so you're safe, but when it's time to turn in the guns no one is going to knock on your door.
2. In a world where they can drone you from the other side of the planet, why would you think your guns will save you? The people we drone usually have more guns than you do, and they are dead as stones.

The guns will not save you, nor protect your liberty. They just kill a lot of people. Liberty now means a good lawyer, not a gun. Even I just want all the guns, not all the liberties. Most of them work just fine. The guns, not so much...

First of all, you would have to have military folks willing to use drones on civilians for an unconstitutional purpose.

Secondly guns HAVE saved people and protected their liberty. There are tons of articles where people breaking in were thwarted by someone with a gun which ended up protecting their liberty of not being robbed. There are also tons of articles where guns have saved people from an otherwise aggressor that was bigger and more powerful than they were.

We get it, you don't like guns. Well here's the interesting thing about freedom......you are free to NOT own one yourself.

You say you don't want all the liberties, but in fact you do. You want to control people's lives. Well you aren't going to control mine and good luck coming for over 300 million firearms. It simply isn't going to happen, but hey you are free to live in a dream world all you want. If you don't like the 2A then feel free to move to a country that doesn't allow guns for their civilians.

 

[Disgruntled_American]

Thanks to another poster...we have this new piece of info.

From Stevemcgarret.....

"Progressive" Jason Brian Dalton Arrested for Random Kalamazoo Shootings After Killing 6 - Was Uber Driver - The Gateway Pundit

It says he worked for Progressive, not that he was a progressive... but never mind, I don't expect you read your own manifesto.

This guy is clearly one of yours. White, overweight, bad haircut.

In most cases where there is a firearm death it is rarely political. There are typically "no sides" when it comes to shootouts. Not in every case mind you, but in most. Take a look at Chicago for one, do you really think the gang members are out there caucusing for liberal or conservatives? NO, they simply don't care.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Guns are all that matter. That never changes.

Guns are never the problem....it's whose hands the guns are in that is the issue.
Same with nuclear weapons.
Someone should tell Obama/Kerry.....telling you has a limited chance of altering your posts.

 

[hadit]

Maybe you getting out of the way will result in mankind living in harmony. Maybe you're the problem.

Not even close.

You're too close to the problem to see it.

Oh no. To view humanity rationally you have to be a long ways away from them and mentally, I am. Humans are like you, they suck, all of them.

Then you should be able to see that being unable to think like a human is to be the problem. Remove you, and humanity can live in harmony with nature, and all the little pebbles will be happy.

Thinking like humans is what makes humans evil. They can rationalize anything. See above.

You're making the pebbles unhappy. Stop it.

 

[2aguy]

Tell us, what makes you so afraid of strict gun control? Others have that and still have freedom. What are you do damn worried about?

People like you who are willing to incinerate 90 million of us because you disagree politically. Socialists are all too quick to chose that method for conflict resolution. We had to deal with your kind in WW2.

1. I'm a liberal, so you're safe, but when it's time to turn in the guns no one is going to knock on your door.
2. In a world where they can drone you from the other side of the planet, why would you think your guns will save you? The people we drone usually have more guns than you do, and they are dead as stones.

The guns will not save you, nor protect your liberty. They just kill a lot of people. Liberty now means a good lawyer, not a gun. Even I just want all the guns, not all the liberties. Most of them work just fine. The guns, not so much...

Yes....and those people we are droning.......made us leave their countries armed with little more than rifles and improvised explosives....so yes...having rifles and pistols is important to securing liberty in this country.....

 

[2aguy]

Thanks to another poster...we have this new piece of info.

From Stevemcgarret.....

"Progressive" Jason Brian Dalton Arrested for Random Kalamazoo Shootings After Killing 6 - Was Uber Driver - The Gateway Pundit

It says he worked for Progressive, not that he was a progressive... but never mind, I don't expect you read your own manifesto.

This guy is clearly one of yours. White, overweight, bad haircut.

In most cases where there is a firearm death it is rarely political. There are typically "no sides" when it comes to shootouts. Not in every case mind you, but in most. Take a look at Chicago for one, do you really think the gang members are out there caucusing for liberal or conservatives? NO, they simply don't care.

Actually, I have posted on this.....the Chicago gangs are politically active. They pick many of the aldermen who run their wards and they use their gang members to work for the candidates the gangs pick. The aldermen then protect the gangs interest and help to keep police resources out of those wards....and help to get their gang members out of jail...........

 

[Disgruntled_American]

Thanks to another poster...we have this new piece of info.

From Stevemcgarret.....

"Progressive" Jason Brian Dalton Arrested for Random Kalamazoo Shootings After Killing 6 - Was Uber Driver - The Gateway Pundit

It says he worked for Progressive, not that he was a progressive... but never mind, I don't expect you read your own manifesto.

This guy is clearly one of yours. White, overweight, bad haircut.

In most cases where there is a firearm death it is rarely political. There are typically "no sides" when it comes to shootouts. Not in every case mind you, but in most. Take a look at Chicago for one, do you really think the gang members are out there caucusing for liberal or conservatives? NO, they simply don't care.

Actually, I have posted on this.....the Chicago gangs are politically active. They pick many of the aldermen who run their wards and they use their gang members to work for the candidates the gangs pick. The aldermen then protect the gangs interest and help to keep police resources out of those wards....and help to get their gang members out of jail...........

Really so are the gangs for or against taxes on corporations since you claim they are so political.

 

[koshergrl]

Guns are all that matter. That never changes.

I have several guns and none have ever committed a crime. Perhaps they are broken?

You don't have to have gun to commit a crime. But in you, I see potential.... sooner or later...sooner or later...

I'd set df's criminal history against yours any day of the week.

 

[hadit]

Tell us, what makes you so afraid of strict gun control? Others have that and still have freedom. What are you do damn worried about?

People like you who are willing to incinerate 90 million of us because you disagree politically. Socialists are all too quick to chose that method for conflict resolution. We had to deal with your kind in WW2.

1. I'm a liberal, so you're safe, but when it's time to turn in the guns no one is going to knock on your door.
2. In a world where they can drone you from the other side of the planet, why would you think your guns will save you? The people we drone usually have more guns than you do, and they are dead as stones.

The guns will not save you, nor protect your liberty. They just kill a lot of people. Liberty now means a good lawyer, not a gun. Even I just want all the guns, not all the liberties. Most of them work just fine. The guns, not so much...

You want to save the world by destroying it. Got it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Tell us, what makes you so afraid of strict gun control? Others have that and still have freedom. What are you do damn worried about?

People like you who are willing to incinerate 90 million of us because you disagree politically. Socialists are all too quick to chose that method for conflict resolution. We had to deal with your kind in WW2.

1. I'm a liberal, so you're safe, but when it's time to turn in the guns no one is going to knock on your door.
2. In a world where they can drone you from the other side of the planet, why would you think your guns will save you? The people we drone usually have more guns than you do, and they are dead as stones.

The guns will not save you, nor protect your liberty. They just kill a lot of people. Liberty now means a good lawyer, not a gun. Even I just want all the guns, not all the liberties. Most of them work just fine. The guns, not so much...

You want to save the world by destroying it. Got it.

Save it by destroying humanity...

 

[TooTall]

I have several guns and none have ever committed a crime. Perhaps they are broken?

His wasn't...

His guns were functional but he was not. Did the human with the gun kill? Or did the gun with a human? If you take the human factor out you remove the death.

If you take the gun out that also works. My choice, both.

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

His wasn't...

His guns were functional but he was not. Did the human with the gun kill? Or did the gun with a human? If you take the human factor out you remove the death.

If you take the gun out that also works. My choice, both.

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

 

[TooTall]

His guns were functional but he was not. Did the human with the gun kill? Or did the gun with a human? If you take the human factor out you remove the death.

If you take the gun out that also works. My choice, both.

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

You could start by enforcing existing laws by taking the guns away from convicted felons and gang members that have guns. How is that working out?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If you take the gun out that also works. My choice, both.

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

You could start by enforcing existing laws by taking the guns away from convicted felons and gang members that have guns. Good luck with that.

As you can see, guns laws don't work very well, people still shoot each other. Let's try a near all-out ban instead.

 

[TooTall]

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

You could start by enforcing existing laws by taking the guns away from convicted felons and gang members that have guns. Good luck with that.

As you can see, guns laws don't work very well, people still shoot each other. Let's try a near all-out ban instead.

Gun laws work very well for the vast majority of legal gun owners. Under your ban, they would be the first to have their guns confiscated leaving them defenseless against the criminals that still have guns. As you noted, gun laws don't work getting the illegal guns off the street. Only a fool would think that a total ban would work any better.

 

[2aguy]

All you have to do is repeal the 2nd Amendment to take the guns out. I'm sure all of the criminals would immediately turn their guns in the the federal authorities.

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

You could start by enforcing existing laws by taking the guns away from convicted felons and gang members that have guns. Good luck with that.

As you can see, guns laws don't work very well, people still shoot each other. Let's try a near all-out ban instead.

Many countries have...and their criminals get guns easily......and in really bad countries the government murders the disarmed people....Europe did this after they disarmed their people after World War 1.

 

[jc456]

Tell us, what makes you so afraid of strict gun control? Others have that and still have freedom. What are you do damn worried about?

because strict gun control doesn't solve mental illness. It's been documented in here quite a lot. You should do some searches if you want to learn anything.

 

[rightwinger]

Thanks to another poster...we have this new piece of info.

From Stevemcgarret.....

"Progressive" Jason Brian Dalton Arrested for Random Kalamazoo Shootings After Killing 6 - Was Uber Driver - The Gateway Pundit

It says he worked for Progressive, not that he was a progressive... but never mind, I don't expect you read your own manifesto.

This guy is clearly one of yours. White, overweight, bad haircut.

The guy is a gun hugging Conservative who worked at Progressive Insurance 5 years ago

 

[jc456]

If they didn't, and they're holding one, they're as good as dead.

That is fucking hilarious! You were making a joke weren't you?

How else would you enforce near universal gun control?

You could start by enforcing existing laws by taking the guns away from convicted felons and gang members that have guns. Good luck with that.

As you can see, guns laws don't work very well, people still shoot each other. Let's try a near all-out ban instead.

Many countries have...and their criminals get guns easily......and in really bad countries the government murders the disarmed people....Europe did this after they disarmed their people after World War 1.

Yeah, ask the folks in Paris.