Justice Kentanji Jackson says laws banning sex changes for young children are "sort of the same thing" as banning interracial marriage.

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
77,088
Reaction score
47,510
Points
2,645
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.

 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.



This is an end result of the left's attempt to equate race with sexuality/gender/sex/fetishes.
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.


Banning sex changes for children is kind of like banning interracial marriage (or any other kind of marriage) FOR CHILDREN.

Children should not be getting sex changes and children should not be getting married, interracial or otherwise.
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.


youve spent the past yrs defending the people that want this and now you complain about them??

I dont get it,,
 
Banning sex changes for children is kind of like banning interracial marriage (or any other kind of marriage) FOR CHILDREN.

Children should not be getting sex changes and children should not be getting married, interracial or otherwise.
Try 'splaning that to the dope KBJ.
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.


Bizzare argument
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.



What, is she a biologist or something?
 
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart.
No, it really only proves you are an adequate test taker (and in many cases, answers for tests are even for sale if you know where to look), but this can hardly be a surprising result after clearing for office a woman to sit on the Supreme Court who could not even say what a woman was.
 
This is just the "arguments" part of the case. Kentanji may have just been posing a hypothetical to the lawyers arguing the case, not advocating for that position herself.
 
It is insane to do a sex change before puberty, since one has not yet had their sexual orientation defined until puberty.
Fetal genitalia do not define a person's sex because there are a number of conditions that can make the genitalia wrong.
 
15th post
This is why having an advanced education doesn't necessarily make you smart. This is the kind of clown show that makes the western world look like a big circus. The idea that we even entertain, let alone allow emotionally driven children to be given drugs to change their body's physiology, which can and have caused long term damaging effects, simply because they feel they are different is shear insanity. We don't allow them to smoke or drink alcohol or get tattoos for a reason. They aren't emotionally mature enough to make responsible decisions, but letting them "change genders" and take pharmaceuticals to physically alter their bodies is perfectly fine.

SCOTUS needs to rule against "gender affirming care" and help put an end to these Frankenstein experiments in minors once and for all. Years from now we're going to look back at these treatments the way we view lobotomies today.



She is a legal scholar and one of the brilliant minds in the history of civilization!

We stand with Justice Jackson!
 
Back
Top Bottom