Justice Department seeks meeting with Ghislane Maxwell amid Epstein Outrage

[dblack]

Kind of a whataboutism fail, considering the post you responded to.

Then I'm sorry your reading comprehension is so poor.

 

[MayorQuimby]

And the vast majority are not.

So you see how these weak points backfire.

"Sometimes scientists are wrong, so I stick forks in electric outlets!"

My point is, trials are as good as the people who are involved. But what if the people involved are dishonest? This is a real possibility. And I am not saying any one particular trial is a fake trial or a show-trial. I am speaking in general terms. Trials don't offer infallible proof that someone is guilty or not.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

My point is, trials are as good as the people who are involved.

And the grand juries and trial juries were fine people.

You have no reason to think otherwise. Nor do you have any successful defense of Trump, just as his lawyers did not.

So you're wasting your time. Grasping at straws.

Notice you can't create any silly doubt using any of the facts of the cases or the evidence. Doesn't that give you any pause?

 

[MayorQuimby]

And the grand juries and trial juries were fine people.

You have no reason to think otherwise. Nor do you have any successful defense of Trump, just as his lawyers did not.

So you're wasting your time. Grasping at straws.

Notice you can't create any silly doubt using any of the facts of the cases or the evidence. Doesn't that give you any pause?

Like I said, I am speaking in general terms, I am not speaking about Trump's trial. I am not defending Trump, either. To be honest, I am not a fan of him.

 

[struth]

And the grand juries and trial juries were fine people.

You have no reason to think otherwise. Nor do you have any successful defense of Trump, just as his lawyers did not.

So you're wasting your time. Grasping at straws.

Notice you can't create any silly doubt using any of the facts of the cases or the evidence. Doesn't that give you any pause?

There obviously can’t be a successful defense in a political show trial

America’s Mandela

 

[OODA_Loop]

Haha, truth is, Trump cares about NOTHING more than what people think of him.

Gotta love that...Alinsky arrows bounce of his armor

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Like I said, I am speaking in general terms, I am not speaking about Trump's trial. I am not defending Trump, either. To be honest, I am not a fan of him.

Right. You're "just saying".

"If you stick a fork in that outlet, you will get shocked.:

"Sometimes scientists are wrong, I'm just sayin'..."

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Gotta love that...Alinsky arrows bounce of his armor

Haha, I can always tell when someone knows nothing about Alinsky. Usually it's when they mention his name.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Right. You're "just saying".

"If you stick a fork in that outlet, you will get shocked.:

"Sometimes scientists are wrong, I'm just sayin'..."

I really don't know what else to say to convince you that I don't care about Trump. Your tears are very funny to watch though.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I really don't know what else to say to convince you that I don't care about Trump. Your tears are very funny to watch though.

Oh boy, troll lines from AOL chat rooms in 1996. Yawn.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You know there was a trial, right?

Are you suggesting these questions were not asked in the cirminal investigation and trial process?

Because that would be kind of absurd.

I was asking if you knew.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Oh boy, troll lines from AOL chat rooms in 1996. Yawn.

Lmao, you used AOL chat rooms.

Were you trying to pick up underage girls?

 

[OODA_Loop]

Haha, I can always tell when someone knows nothing about Alinsky. Usually it's when they mention his name.

Ah enlighten us Alinsky scholar......standing by

 

[Orangecat]

Look at you, pretending you know what you are talking about!

You're just dull and unintelligent, kid. Stop trying so hard.

 

[Orangecat]

Haha, I can always tell when someone knows nothing about Alinsky. Usually it's when they mention his name.

You just mentioned his name...

 

[MayorQuimby]

You just mentioned his name...

lol!

 

[LeftofLeft]

Sorry, that trial came and went. You will have to inform yourself.

Rape is sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is not rape. It cost a major network $15 Million for falsely calling Trump a rapist as you are doing. Inform yourself.

 

[the watcher]

Some trials are show-trials.

The Nuremberg was one such trial.

The OJ Simpson trial proved that jury nullification is very much still in use today.

 

[The Duke]

These people are shameless. It was bad enough to pardon all the nuts that beat cops on J6. But then bubbly Pam has fired J6 career prosecutors, because they did their job.

Storming the US Capitol on J6 and beating cops was a crime. But in this regime, the only laws are the ones that trump comes up with. What do you expect from a convicted Felon/Pedo?

My first impulse is to say, "there's no way he's going to pardon someone who was convicted of those things", but then I remember he pardoned those insurrectionists who beat the shit out of Capitol cops.

So, I guess, yeah, I suppose he might do it.

What if Maxwell was over-charged and sentenced?

 

[The Duke]

Haha, I can always tell when someone knows nothing about Alinsky. Usually it's when they mention his name.

I can tell you know nothing every other post you make!
It's very easy!