Justice Department seeks meeting with Ghislane Maxwell amid Epstein Outrage

[Lesh]

Well, there you go then . . .


Got it.

Yes, I am sure you are correct about that.

I'm guessing that she'll get some version of the Witness Protection Program that will actually protect her.

PS: I just asked AI how many people have died in the WPP, and the answer was zero - zero people died as long as they followed the WPP rules and instructions by the Marshalls. It was the first line of nearly every hit I got on a google search.

So maybe she'll be fine.

Why do you care? She’s pure scum

 

[Seymour Flops]

Why do you care? She’s pure scum

I'd like for her to reveal the names of the scum who paid her to be so scummy.

Wouldn't you?

 

[Lesh]

I'd like for her to reveal the names of the scum who paid her to be so scummy.

Wouldn't you?

And if a pardon keeps her from doing that???

 

[TimFitz]

Obviously America wants this to go away.

Trump nation is not America.

 

[Seymour Flops]

And if a pardon keeps her from doing that???

A pardon after she tells all would be the incintive. Until then immunity will orotect her from self incrimination.

Why do Dems and "not Dems" want her to stay silent?

 

[WEATHER53]

Nope

In writing

 

[Lesh]

A pardon after she tells all would be the incintive. Until then immunity will orotect her from self incrimination.

Why do Dems and "not Dems" want her to stay silent?

Then again… the pardon is being granted by someone she may implicate.

It would be in his interest and hers to keep his name out of it

 

[WEATHER53]

If I was frantically and vociferously defending cannibals in thread after thread you would believe I was a cannibal, or okay with cannibalism. Sorry, dude. Stop defending pedophiles.

I’m rebuking your lies which you try to turn into being a pedo . That’s not permitted here unless with regard to Trump

 

[Seymour Flops]

Then again… the pardon is being granted by someone she may implicate.

It would be in his interest and hers to keep his name out of it

Sure, but we'd get other names.

 

[Lesh]

Sure, but we'd get other names.

So you’d be ok if Trump pardoned her to keep his name out of it…

 

[Seymour Flops]

So you’d be ok if Trump pardoned her to keep his name out of it…

If it led to getting other names, sure.

For whatever reason, we have not gotten Trump's name. Why sacrifice a chance to get others names on the very low probability that Trump is implicated but the Autopen Administration chose not to release that information.

You are willing to let everyone who Maxwell could name as a child abusing sex-trafficker because she would not name Trump, when you don't even know if she has any information about Trump that is not already known.

You are obsessed.

 

[MayorQuimby]

The Nuremberg Trials were definitely not "show trials", you retard. They only finally released the audio transcripts in 2021.

Complete Nuremberg Trials recordings online for the first time

You scumbags will lie about everything.

I wonder why you are having such a strong emotional reaction. Is your manhood tied up in the Nuremberg not being a show-trial?

Look, I wasn't born yet when Nuremberg took place, I wasn't there, of course I cannot say that I have definitive proof that it was a show trial. However, the things that you mentioned, the transcripts being released: first of all, 80 years later? Yea, that's highly suspect. It's so far removed from the actual event that it makes me think that it must have been extremely sensitive at the relevant time that they just could NOT have released it some time shortly after the trial. They release it now so that they give stupid people (you are one of them) the illusion that there is transparency in how governments work. Secondly, transcripts, especially when all the relevant people have pretty much all died off, can be faked. So, your precious little transcripts don't mean jack to me or anybody with half an ounce of brain matter.

Furthermore, I have heard the rumor, again, no actual proof, that numerous high-ranking Nazi officers had had their confessions obtained under duress. Just in case this isn't clear enough to a retard like you, that means they were being tortured to give their "true confessions".

 

[lennypartiv]

Nope

TRUMPERS want it to go away

Sadly (for them) it won’t

Patriotic Americans want it to go away.

 

[Delldude]

You are willing to let everyone who Maxwell could name as a child abusing sex-trafficker because she would not name Trump, when you don't even know if she has any information about Trump that is not already known.

DOJ wants to release the interview transcript.

During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview, multiple sources familiar with the internal discussions told ABC News.

Ghislaine Maxwell told DOJ Trump never did anything concerning around her: Sources

During her interview with the DOJ last month, former Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing that would be harmful to President Trump, sources say.

share.google

 

[dblack]

DOJ wants to release the interview transcript.

During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview, multiple sources familiar with the internal discussions told ABC News.

Ghislaine Maxwell told DOJ Trump never did anything concerning around her: Sources

During her interview with the DOJ last month, former Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing that would be harmful to President Trump, sources say.

share.google

Huh... who coulda seen that coming?

 

[Seymour Flops]

DOJ wants to release the interview transcript.

During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said.

The Trump administration, meanwhile, is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview, multiple sources familiar with the internal discussions told ABC News.

Ghislaine Maxwell told DOJ Trump never did anything concerning around her: Sources

During her interview with the DOJ last month, former Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing that would be harmful to President Trump, sources say.

share.google

Good!

Information is good.

Even if Maxwell lied her ass off for the whole interview, the public should be trusted to judge that truthfulness.

Yes, some partisan hacks will say she was lying to help Trump and get a pardon, and some will say she finally told the truth, depending on what she said.

But most of us are not partisan hacks, so we can read the transcript and decide for ourselves.

This has been a key theme of the Trump years. One side saying "let the American people decide," and the other side saying, "no, they suck!"

 

[Delldude]

Even if Maxwell lied her ass off for the whole interview, the public should be trusted to judge that truthfulness.

Beyond all this, if Trump partied with little girls, why haven't the dems discovered it?

This whole issue is fading into the sunset...... MAGA will still support Him down the road when it counts.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's a good defense because if there were something there regarding Trump, democrats would have already used it.

Since there's nothing, they have to make it up, then be outraged that no one found anything.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Diseased democrats demanded that Ghislaine Maxwell be questioned under oath for one reason and one reason only. So they could say they don't believe her. She's covering for Trump.

 

[Twisted Gypsy Child]

So, this is where this Kabuki Theater starts to get interesting, although we have to change the ending to this play from the one imposed on Jeffrey Epstein. I wonder what this performative bullshit will yield for the "Justice Department". Her lawyer is smart, he is appealing to Trump indirectly by complimenting him. She is likely safer in prison than if she were released.



Facing sustained backlash over their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, Justice Department officials said Tuesday that they hope to meet with his imprisoned associate Ghislaine Maxwell to discuss anyone else “who has committed crimes against victims.”

The announcement, from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, is the latest effort by the administration to quell the growing outrage among some sectors of President Donald Trump’s base after the Justice Department concluded this month that investigators had no additional evidence implicating “any additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.”

That finding has ignited a furor among conspiracy theorists and Trump’s supporters, who had been primed for years to expect blockbuster revelations implicating powerful accomplices based on vows from the president and his allies to make public the FBI’s files on Epstein.

Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison in Florida after being convicted in 2021 for her role in Epstein’s crimes. She is appealing her conviction to the Supreme Court — a push the Justice Department, in court filings last week, said it opposes.

“I can confirm that we are in discussions with the government and that Ghislaine will always testify truthfully,” her attorney David Oscar Markus said in a statement. “We are grateful to President Trump for his commitment to uncovering the truth in this case.”

Blanche said in his statement Tuesday that the department stands by its assessment that the original investigation produced no evidence that would warrant prosecution of others.

But he cited Trump’s directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi last week to release more evidence in the case, a move that prompted the Justice Department to petition courts in Manhattan and Florida to release grand jury transcripts surrounding the prosecutions.

WaPo

color me surprised


Ghislaine Maxwell told a top official of the Department of Justice that former President Bill Clinton never visited Jeffrey Epstein's private island estate and had no independent relationship with him outside of the trips the ex-president took on Epstein's plane in the early 2000s, according to a transcript of Maxwell's interview with the DOJ that was released Friday.

"President Clinton was my friend, not Epstein's friend," Maxwell told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. "President Clinton liked me, and we got along terribly well. But I never saw that warmth with Mr. Epstein."

What Ghislaine Maxwell told deputy AG about former President Bill Clinton

Maxwell said that Bill Clinton never visited Epstein's private island estate.

www.yahoo.com