Justice Department ordered to answer for Jan. 6 killing of Ashli Babbitt

[Superbadbrutha]

Israel is an enemy of the US. Israel owns congresscritters. Track AIPAC

Check out that link and you will see that 96 out of 100 senators are paid by Israel. The number in the house is about the same. That data shows how the legislative branch is corrupt, and a large factor in that corruption is the control of Israel, lobbying to pass illegitimate legislation.

Lisa558 is this true?

 

[PeterPilot]

Lisa558 is this true?

I thought you were one of those guys who thinks for himself. Guess I was wrong.

96% of the Senate takes $ from Israel, those members have an Israeli "handler". Ain't it great!

 

[WEATHER53]

Murdered for entering a place that hundreds had been let into

 

[Dante]

MAGA Lives Matter

MAGA Lives MATTER "Fuk the Police!" -- the Law & Order crowd

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I thought you were one of those guys who thinks for himself. Guess I was wrong.

96% of the Senate takes $ from Israel, those members have an Israeli "handler". Ain't it great!

I am asking her a question, doesn't have a damn thing to do with me thinking for myself.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

The perpetrator. That's the reality of the situation. A person who was in the act of committing a felony.

She didn't perpetrate the shot that killed her, she perpetrated the break-in.

We can quibble over semantics if you like but her being shot, and the only one shot, was my point. If you remember, my question was, why just the one? Beyond that, I never defended her actions or the actions of anyone else that day. They should not have been there and the break-in angered me.

Use your head for something besides holding up that stupid red had for a change.

I don't have a red "had" or a red hat and it's not relevant to the discussion anyway.

 

[rightwinger]

She didn't perpetrate the shot that killed her, she perpetrated the break-in.

We can quibble over semantics if you like but her being shot, and the only one shot, was my point. If you remember, my question was, why just the one? Beyond that, I never defended her actions or the actions of anyone else that day. They should not have been there and the break-in angered me.


I don't have a red "had" or a red hat and it's not relevant to the discussion anyway.

Ashli was leading an assault on Senate chambers
She led an angry mob
She refused orders to pull back
That made her a threat

 

[Crepitus]

She didn't perpetrate the shot that killed her, she perpetrated the break-in.

We can quibble over semantics if you like but her being shot, and the only one shot, was my point. If you remember, my question was, why just the one? Beyond that, I never defended her actions or the actions of anyone else that day. They should not have been there and the break-in angered me.


I don't have a red "had" or a red hat and it's not relevant to the discussion anyway.

Who goes to prison if a bank robber is shot in the act of robbing the bank?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Ashli was leading an assault on Senate chambers
She led an angry mob
She refused orders to pull back
That made her a threat

As I told Crepitus, I don't defend her actions. I just wonder why she was the only one shot.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Who goes to prison if a bank robber is shot in the act of robbing the bank?

Your question is moot. My question was not: why did she get shot?, it was why was she the only one?

 

[pknopp]

Your question is moot. My question was not: why did she get shot?, it was why was she the only one?

We can also ask why it is for many she seems to be the only one that matters.

People have been killed by the police for doing absolutely nothing illegal and they don't get the defense that Trump supporters give Babbitt.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

We can also ask why it is for many she seems to be the only one that matters.

Because she was the only one shot that day among a crowd of hundreds trying to break in.

People have been killed by the police for doing absolutely nothing illegal and they don't get the defense that Trump supporters give Babbitt.

You may have noticed I've already said twice I don't defend her actions.

 

[pknopp]

Because she was the only one shot that day among a crowd of hundreds trying to break in.

Yeah, avoid the point.

You may have noticed I've already said twice I don't defend her actions.

Which has nothing to do with my point or question to you. By not answering you have clearly answered.

 

[Crepitus]

Your question is moot.

No. My question is about your understanding of reality at this point.

Obviously you've completely lost touch.

 

[rightwinger]

As I told Crepitus, I don't defend her actions. I just wonder why she was the only one shot.

The others got the message

 

[Superbadbrutha]

As I told Crepitus, I don't defend her actions. I just wonder why she was the only one shot.

Because after she was shot everybody else backed the hell up.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Yeah, avoid the point.

What point?

Which has nothing to do with my point or question to you.

You never asked me a question. You said: "We can also ask why it is for many she seems to be the only one that matters."

There was one person shot that day so who or what else would matter to them?

By not answering you have clearly answered.

I did answer. Or rather, I responded to your hypothetical and posited that for them, Babbit is the only one that matters because she was the only one shot that day.

If you have a point behind your hypothetical that I'm missing, enlighten me .

 

[pknopp]

What point?


You never asked me a question. You said: "We can also ask why it is for many she seems to be the only one that matters."

There was one person shot that day so who or what else would matter to them?

I did answer. Or rather, I responded to your hypothetical and posited that for them, Babbit is the only one that matters because she was the only one shot that day.

If you have a point behind your hypothetical that I'm missing, enlighten me .

You understand the point.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

No. My question is about your understanding of reality at this point.

My "understanding of reality"? I have made no claims nor have I even offered opinions about what happened. In addition, I said twice that I do not defend her actions. So what reality am I avoiding here?

Obviously you've completely lost touch.

Lost touch with what? Again, I did not ask why she was shot. She was shot for trying to unlawfully enter the Capital building and I know this. I asked a simple question: Why was she the only one shot that day? Do you understand the distinction?

Instead of answering the question you give me rhetorical nonsense about sympathy for "delusional whackos".

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

You understand the point.

I made a sincere request for you to clarify and you refuse. Okay.