Justice Department not going after McCabe

The Purge said:
Lesh said:
Weatherman2020 said:
easyt65 said:
colfax_m said:
The DoJ did not declare he committed a crime.
Click to expand...
Bwuhahahahaha......

What do you think 'lack of candor under oath' means lil' snowflake?
Click to expand...
While at the same time Stone is going to prison for ...... lying under oath!
Click to expand...
And witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Convicted in a court of law.
Conversely a Grand Jury refused to indict McCabe... which almost never happens

ever hear the saying “they could indict a ham sandwich “?
Click to expand...

If the McCabe grand jury did return a no true bill, neither the Constitution nor Justice Department policy would absolutely prohibit prosecutors from presenting the case to another grand jury
Click to expand...
No, but it would appear petty and weak. If you can’t even get a grand jury to indict, that’s bad.
 
Mac-7 said:
task0778 said:
The Purge said:
task0778 said:
This isn't about McCabe being found innocent. This is about not finding enough evidence to indict or convict. You don't want a justice system where a person can be investigated without reasonable cause, or arrested and indicted if the evidence is insufficient as far as the rules of evidence in a court dictate. I couldn't say whether McCabe actually committed a provable crime, with the emphasis on 'provable', so no charges will be filed. That's the way it is supposed to work; sadly, it doesn't sometimes as politics and money tilts the scales of justice.
Click to expand...
Funny though, isn't it that the IG found enough evidence to make it a CRIMINAL REFERAL....One would ASSUME that in order for that, there would be MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT....UNLESS something like SEDITION AT A MINIMUM, or Treason was STILL ON THE MINDS of the AG....Makes sense to me. Other left wing, anti-Americans would disagree!
Click to expand...

The Justice Department on Friday informed legal counsel for former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe that it would not seek to file criminal charges against McCabe over his misleading federal investigators in connection with a 2016 press leak.
DOJ Declines to Pursue Criminal Charges against Andrew McCabe | National Review

Either he cut a deal to rat out other miscreants or the fact is that they couldn't prove he lied under oath. IOW, what he said probably could have been interpreted in more than one way. But I don't think this means he's out of the woods just yet, the DOJ can file other charges or even this one again if new information surfaces. Double jeopardy does not apply if you weren't indicted.
Click to expand...
McCabe did lie to the FBI

Andrew McCabe Lied. So Will the FBI Apply the Same Rules Against Him That It Applies to All of Us?

It’s official: McCabe lied.

The new report from the Justice Department inspector general concludes that Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director, lied to then-FBI Director James Comey, to other FBI agents, and to officials of the Office of the Inspector General. Some of those lies came when McCabe was under oath.
Click to expand...

FYI:

To be sure, the inspector general’s report that prompted McCabe’s firing paints a deeply troubling portrait of McCabe’s conduct. It describes, in brief, how McCabe authorized an October 2016 disclosure on background to the Wall Street Journal and then misrepresented his role in the story on several occasions—including to the inspector general. I have no reason to disbelieve the inspector general’s account of this episode and no interest in defending McCabe’s alleged conduct. While McCabe has disputed the findings, he has not—at least not as of yet—presented a plausible alternative narrative that accounts for the facts the inspector general recounts. My point here is thus not to suggest that McCabe did nothing wrong.

But criminal charges? At least based on what’s in the inspector general’s report, this is very far from a criminal case. Criminal dispositions on false statements matters in internal investigations are exceptionally rare. Absent some gross aggravating factor, I struggle to think of any other examples. Workplace false statements are normally handled through internal disciplinary means, not criminal charges. There are countless public cases of gross misconduct and lies about that misconduct that are routinely declined as criminal matters. Here are a few examples of such cases culled from recent Office of the Inspector General investigations:

The list could go on and on and on, but you get the point. Indeed, the extraordinary thing about McCabe’s case compared to these ones is that the Justice Department appears to have engineered McCabe’s firing, ostensibly in response to the inspector general’s finding of a lack of candor, mere hours before his retirement eligibility. It’s true that the FBI routinely treats lack of candor as a fireable offense—but it remains unexplained why the Justice Department seemingly raced the clock in order to push McCabe out rather than proceed at the usual pace and note that he would have been subject to disciplinary proceedings if he had not retired. That alone is a vindictive level of harshness relative to the norm. Criminal prosecution is several standard deviations from the norm.

Perhaps one might argue that McCabe is differently situated from these people—a high-ranking FBI official whose example might plausibly serve as a deterrent to misconduct by others. But the reality is quite the opposite. The prosecution of McCabe would, indeed, send a message, but it would send a very different message from one of even-handed application of the rules to those high up on the totem pole.

Because, in fact, there are some substantially mitigating factors in McCabe’s case, even assuming that the facts are every bit as bad as the inspector general alleges. For one thing, the events took place during a chaotic time at the bureau when the FBI was handling politically explosive investigations involving both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Even if one doesn’t believe, as McCabe contends, that he was merely confused when he made the false statements, the intense pressure of the situation is mitigating. Moreover, McCabe did correct the record following his misstatements to the inspector general; a few days after the interview in question, he called up investigators and said he had been reflecting on his statement and believed he had erred.

There’s another problem with prosecuting McCabe. Justice Department policy dictates that prosecutors should bring a case only if they believe not only that the person is guilty of an offense but that “the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction.” Goldman’s story makes clear that the case here faces some significant evidentiary problems.

Thoughts on the Impending Prosecution of Andrew McCabe

Note: Goldman is the NY Times reporter who wrote about the McCabe story back in August. Some may disagree and that's fine, but I do not believe the DOJ dropped this case unless they believed a conviction was not likely OR that criminal charges were not in fact warranted. True, it ain't right that some people lied to the FBI and were prosecuted and that politics probably did come into play for or against the accused. And it could be that more serious charges will be forthcoming for him when the Durham report comes out and indictments are handed down. You don't want to prosecute a guy and lose and then subsequently bring more charges, no? We wouldn't want to be accused of a witch-hunt, would we?
 
Votto said:
Dragonlady said:
debbiedowner said:
The veins on Trumps forehead has to be popping out about now and the tweets begin. This is some funny shit. Not going to charge McCabe

Justice Dept. won’t charge Andrew McCabe, the former FBI official who authorized the investigation of President Trump
Click to expand...

Trump is still calling for charges against Hillary Clinton even though none of the 5 investigations he's instigated against her has found any evidence of indictable offences.

I'm thoroughly enjoying Trump's public meltdown, as his every action of vindictiveness and vengeance will drive more voters away from him each and every day.

McCabe has sued from wrongful dismissal and I expect him to succeed in that suit. Lisa Page has sued the Department of Justice for violation of privacy, violation of her first amendment rights, and slander. I also expect this suit to succeed as well.
Click to expand...

Flynn went to jail for one lie to the FBI

Hillary gets to run for President for multiple lies

Click to expand...


Yes and your imaginary deep state. LOL how's all that going? Since no one that wanted charged has been charged.
 
task0778 said:
Mac-7 said:
task0778 said:
The Purge said:
task0778 said:
This isn't about McCabe being found innocent. This is about not finding enough evidence to indict or convict. You don't want a justice system where a person can be investigated without reasonable cause, or arrested and indicted if the evidence is insufficient as far as the rules of evidence in a court dictate. I couldn't say whether McCabe actually committed a provable crime, with the emphasis on 'provable', so no charges will be filed. That's the way it is supposed to work; sadly, it doesn't sometimes as politics and money tilts the scales of justice.
Click to expand...
Funny though, isn't it that the IG found enough evidence to make it a CRIMINAL REFERAL....One would ASSUME that in order for that, there would be MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT....UNLESS something like SEDITION AT A MINIMUM, or Treason was STILL ON THE MINDS of the AG....Makes sense to me. Other left wing, anti-Americans would disagree!
Click to expand...

The Justice Department on Friday informed legal counsel for former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe that it would not seek to file criminal charges against McCabe over his misleading federal investigators in connection with a 2016 press leak.
DOJ Declines to Pursue Criminal Charges against Andrew McCabe | National Review

Either he cut a deal to rat out other miscreants or the fact is that they couldn't prove he lied under oath. IOW, what he said probably could have been interpreted in more than one way. But I don't think this means he's out of the woods just yet, the DOJ can file other charges or even this one again if new information surfaces. Double jeopardy does not apply if you weren't indicted.
Click to expand...
McCabe did lie to the FBI

Andrew McCabe Lied. So Will the FBI Apply the Same Rules Against Him That It Applies to All of Us?

It’s official: McCabe lied.

The new report from the Justice Department inspector general concludes that Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director, lied to then-FBI Director James Comey, to other FBI agents, and to officials of the Office of the Inspector General. Some of those lies came when McCabe was under oath.
Click to expand...

FYI:

To be sure, the inspector general’s report that prompted McCabe’s firing paints a deeply troubling portrait of McCabe’s conduct. It describes, in brief, how McCabe authorized an October 2016 disclosure on background to the Wall Street Journal and then misrepresented his role in the story on several occasions—including to the inspector general. I have no reason to disbelieve the inspector general’s account of this episode and no interest in defending McCabe’s alleged conduct. While McCabe has disputed the findings, he has not—at least not as of yet—presented a plausible alternative narrative that accounts for the facts the inspector general recounts. My point here is thus not to suggest that McCabe did nothing wrong.

But criminal charges? At least based on what’s in the inspector general’s report, this is very far from a criminal case. Criminal dispositions on false statements matters in internal investigations are exceptionally rare. Absent some gross aggravating factor, I struggle to think of any other examples. Workplace false statements are normally handled through internal disciplinary means, not criminal charges. There are countless public cases of gross misconduct and lies about that misconduct that are routinely declined as criminal matters. Here are a few examples of such cases culled from recent Office of the Inspector General investigations:

The list could go on and on and on, but you get the point. Indeed, the extraordinary thing about McCabe’s case compared to these ones is that the Justice Department appears to have engineered McCabe’s firing, ostensibly in response to the inspector general’s finding of a lack of candor, mere hours before his retirement eligibility. It’s true that the FBI routinely treats lack of candor as a fireable offense—but it remains unexplained why the Justice Department seemingly raced the clock in order to push McCabe out rather than proceed at the usual pace and note that he would have been subject to disciplinary proceedings if he had not retired. That alone is a vindictive level of harshness relative to the norm. Criminal prosecution is several standard deviations from the norm.

Perhaps one might argue that McCabe is differently situated from these people—a high-ranking FBI official whose example might plausibly serve as a deterrent to misconduct by others. But the reality is quite the opposite. The prosecution of McCabe would, indeed, send a message, but it would send a very different message from one of even-handed application of the rules to those high up on the totem pole.

Because, in fact, there are some substantially mitigating factors in McCabe’s case, even assuming that the facts are every bit as bad as the inspector general alleges. For one thing, the events took place during a chaotic time at the bureau when the FBI was handling politically explosive investigations involving both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Even if one doesn’t believe, as McCabe contends, that he was merely confused when he made the false statements, the intense pressure of the situation is mitigating. Moreover, McCabe did correct the record following his misstatements to the inspector general; a few days after the interview in question, he called up investigators and said he had been reflecting on his statement and believed he had erred.

There’s another problem with prosecuting McCabe. Justice Department policy dictates that prosecutors should bring a case only if they believe not only that the person is guilty of an offense but that “the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction.” Goldman’s story makes clear that the case here faces some significant evidentiary problems.

Thoughts on the Impending Prosecution of Andrew McCabe

Note: Goldman is the NY Times reporter who wrote about the McCabe story back in August. Some may disagree and that's fine, but I do not believe the DOJ dropped this case unless they believed a conviction was not likely OR that criminal charges were not in fact warranted. True, it ain't right that some people lied to the FBI and were prosecuted and that politics probably did come into play for or against the accused. And it could be that more serious charges will be forthcoming for him when the Durham report comes out and indictments are handed down. You don't want to prosecute a guy and lose and then subsequently bring more charges, no? We wouldn't want to be accused of a witch-hunt, would we?
Click to expand...
I’m sure the IG tried REAL hard to find criminal wrongdoing by one of his fellow Deep State swamp rats
 
task0778 said:
Mac-7 said:
task0778 said:
The Purge said:
task0778 said:
This isn't about McCabe being found innocent. This is about not finding enough evidence to indict or convict. You don't want a justice system where a person can be investigated without reasonable cause, or arrested and indicted if the evidence is insufficient as far as the rules of evidence in a court dictate. I couldn't say whether McCabe actually committed a provable crime, with the emphasis on 'provable', so no charges will be filed. That's the way it is supposed to work; sadly, it doesn't sometimes as politics and money tilts the scales of justice.
Click to expand...
Funny though, isn't it that the IG found enough evidence to make it a CRIMINAL REFERAL....One would ASSUME that in order for that, there would be MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT....UNLESS something like SEDITION AT A MINIMUM, or Treason was STILL ON THE MINDS of the AG....Makes sense to me. Other left wing, anti-Americans would disagree!
Click to expand...

The Justice Department on Friday informed legal counsel for former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe that it would not seek to file criminal charges against McCabe over his misleading federal investigators in connection with a 2016 press leak.
DOJ Declines to Pursue Criminal Charges against Andrew McCabe | National Review

Either he cut a deal to rat out other miscreants or the fact is that they couldn't prove he lied under oath. IOW, what he said probably could have been interpreted in more than one way. But I don't think this means he's out of the woods just yet, the DOJ can file other charges or even this one again if new information surfaces. Double jeopardy does not apply if you weren't indicted.
Click to expand...
McCabe did lie to the FBI

Andrew McCabe Lied. So Will the FBI Apply the Same Rules Against Him That It Applies to All of Us?

It’s official: McCabe lied.

The new report from the Justice Department inspector general concludes that Andrew McCabe, the former FBI deputy director, lied to then-FBI Director James Comey, to other FBI agents, and to officials of the Office of the Inspector General. Some of those lies came when McCabe was under oath.
Click to expand...

FYI:

To be sure, the inspector general’s report that prompted McCabe’s firing paints a deeply troubling portrait of McCabe’s conduct. It describes, in brief, how McCabe authorized an October 2016 disclosure on background to the Wall Street Journal and then misrepresented his role in the story on several occasions—including to the inspector general. I have no reason to disbelieve the inspector general’s account of this episode and no interest in defending McCabe’s alleged conduct. While McCabe has disputed the findings, he has not—at least not as of yet—presented a plausible alternative narrative that accounts for the facts the inspector general recounts. My point here is thus not to suggest that McCabe did nothing wrong.

But criminal charges? At least based on what’s in the inspector general’s report, this is very far from a criminal case. Criminal dispositions on false statements matters in internal investigations are exceptionally rare. Absent some gross aggravating factor, I struggle to think of any other examples. Workplace false statements are normally handled through internal disciplinary means, not criminal charges. There are countless public cases of gross misconduct and lies about that misconduct that are routinely declined as criminal matters. Here are a few examples of such cases culled from recent Office of the Inspector General investigations:

The list could go on and on and on, but you get the point. Indeed, the extraordinary thing about McCabe’s case compared to these ones is that the Justice Department appears to have engineered McCabe’s firing, ostensibly in response to the inspector general’s finding of a lack of candor, mere hours before his retirement eligibility. It’s true that the FBI routinely treats lack of candor as a fireable offense—but it remains unexplained why the Justice Department seemingly raced the clock in order to push McCabe out rather than proceed at the usual pace and note that he would have been subject to disciplinary proceedings if he had not retired. That alone is a vindictive level of harshness relative to the norm. Criminal prosecution is several standard deviations from the norm.

Perhaps one might argue that McCabe is differently situated from these people—a high-ranking FBI official whose example might plausibly serve as a deterrent to misconduct by others. But the reality is quite the opposite. The prosecution of McCabe would, indeed, send a message, but it would send a very different message from one of even-handed application of the rules to those high up on the totem pole.

Because, in fact, there are some substantially mitigating factors in McCabe’s case, even assuming that the facts are every bit as bad as the inspector general alleges. For one thing, the events took place during a chaotic time at the bureau when the FBI was handling politically explosive investigations involving both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Even if one doesn’t believe, as McCabe contends, that he was merely confused when he made the false statements, the intense pressure of the situation is mitigating. Moreover, McCabe did correct the record following his misstatements to the inspector general; a few days after the interview in question, he called up investigators and said he had been reflecting on his statement and believed he had erred.

There’s another problem with prosecuting McCabe. Justice Department policy dictates that prosecutors should bring a case only if they believe not only that the person is guilty of an offense but that “the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction.” Goldman’s story makes clear that the case here faces some significant evidentiary problems.

Thoughts on the Impending Prosecution of Andrew McCabe

Note: Goldman is the NY Times reporter who wrote about the McCabe story back in August. Some may disagree and that's fine, but I do not believe the DOJ dropped this case unless they believed a conviction was not likely OR that criminal charges were not in fact warranted. True, it ain't right that some people lied to the FBI and were prosecuted and that politics probably did come into play for or against the accused. And it could be that more serious charges will be forthcoming for him when the Durham report comes out and indictments are handed down. You don't want to prosecute a guy and lose and then subsequently bring more charges, no? We wouldn't want to be accused of a witch-hunt, would we?
Click to expand...

Whatever explanations and excuses are offered up, we have a two-tiered justice system.
We've arrived at one justice for the ruling class, and the other form being 'JustUs'.
 
easyt65 said:
edthecynic said:
Tramp said the investigators should apologize to him when he was "exonerated," so it is only fair that the pathological liar should apologize to McCabe after his complete exoneration from Tramp's witch hunt!!!!!
If Tramp was a real man he would set the example!!!!!
Click to expand...
The DOJ declaring he committed a crime but refuses to Indict is not exactly an 'exoneration', lil' snowflake.
Click to expand...
Actually the DOJ tried to indict but the Grand Jury refused to indict McCabe, so YES it was complete and total exoneration.
 
James Clapper was caught committing Perjury .... TWICE

John Brennan was caught illegally spying on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, & USSC Justices....instead of being indicted and facing 7-9 years in prison all he had to do was appear before Congress, admit his crimes, and promise not to do it again...

Eric Holder was caught committing Perjury & Obstruction....instead if being Indicted and facing 7 - 9 years in prison Barry protected him....still, a bipartisan Congress Censured Holder for his crimes, making him the 1st Presidential Cabinet Member / US AG in US history to be Censured.

FBI records show Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin both lied under oath when questioned by the FBI

The US IG found evidence proving both Comey and McCabe lied under oath - the US IG recommended both for Indictment

Comey admitted to leaking classified...and testified that McCabe had leaked classified

The US IG reported Strzok lied to investigators and recommended him for Indictment...

Former FBI Agent Page testified that McCabe lied, that Rosenstein lied - that he told both her and McCabe the DOJ was not interested and would not pursue a criminal case against Hillary despite evidence of her crimes and agents like Baker who testified there were agents w/o wanted to recommend her for Indictment...

Rosenstein and Comey both committed FUSA Court Abuses by lying on the warrants, knowingly submitted known false info and through withholding exculpatory evidence

Clinesmith was USed by the US IG for being the agent who not only lied but falsified / altered official documents used to commit FISA Court Abuses...

None of these Deep State Obama administration criminals have been indicted for their already proven crimes...

....meanwhile Stone faces an excessive prison sentence that is more than twice as long as the average rapist or murderer does in prison for a 'Process' crime - LYING...
 
According to the Deep State hold-over DOJ and Grand Jury, every bit of evidence of crime Horowitz provided against Democrats / the FBI / McCabe / etc..., his decades of legal / judicial expertise and oversight, his ability to investigate and be trusted enough with recommendations to indict or not have been proven to be completely wrong / inadequate / flawed / untrustworthy.....

The DOJ can't afford to have such a despicable buffoon as the US IG....so, Horowitz should be fired immediately....
 
Looks like the plan to fire McCabe hours before retirement to cheat him out of his retirement and have him charged on "trumped up" charges failed. He is free and clear and will be collecting his $2,000,000 retirement pay after all.
 
White 6 said:
Looks like the plan to fire McCabe hours before retirement to cheat him out of his retirement and have him charged on "trumped up" charges failed. He is free and clear and will be collecting his $2,000,000 retirement pay after all.
Click to expand...
'trumped up charges'?

The US IG gave evidence of him lying under oath 4 times and leaking classified, which Comey himself testified to under oath.

The DOJ saying it will not pursue Indictment is not the same as saying he is innocent of all charges / accusations.

McCabe withheld exculpatory evidence, helping to bankrupt / destroy other people's / family's lives...the SOB deserved the same and to go to jail.
 
The Purge said:
debbiedowner said:
The veins on Trumps forehead has to be popping out about now and the tweets begin. This is some funny shit. Not going to charge McCabe

Justice Dept. won’t charge Andrew McCabe, the former FBI official who authorized the investigation of President Trump
Click to expand...
Glad to see you favor unlawfullness, and corruption...but you anti-Americans show what pieces of scum you are with each post! But No point when there are much more serious charges for him.

Could he possibly turned RAT on guys who wanted to sink him. Specifically Comey....developing!
Click to expand...

Sez who? You? There has to be evidence and clearly there is no evidence or in other words, you have no clue what you are talking about.
 
easyt65 said:
White 6 said:
Looks like the plan to fire McCabe hours before retirement to cheat him out of his retirement and have him charged on "trumped up" charges failed. He is free and clear and will be collecting his $2,000,000 retirement pay after all.
Click to expand...
'trumped up charges'?

The US IG gave evidence of him lying under oath 4 times and leaking classified, which Comey himself testified to under oath.

The DOJ saying it will not pursue Indictment is not the same as saying he is innocent of all charges / accusations.

McCabe withheld exculpatory evidence, helping to bankrupt / destroy other people's / family's lives...the SOB deserved the same and to go to jail.
Click to expand...

The IG gave no evidence of this and clearly the DOJ was unable to find any evidence of this.

Yes he is innocent since he has not been charged. That is how our legal system works.

McCabe withheld nothing. Trump is the one who is responsible for this and he is clearly willing to get help from Russia in 2020 as he did in 2016.
 
Now we know why the DOJ dropped the case against McCabe...today.

A federal judge compared White House involvement in an investigation of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to a “banana republic,” and accused people “at the top” of undermining the “integrity” of the judicial process, new documents revealed Friday.

The chilling statements were disclosed in records obtained by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington in a lawsuit. The attack by U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton on White House pressure emerged amid mounting controversy over Attorney General William Barr’s manipulation of criminal cases involving allies of President Donald Trump or those he perceives as enemies.

JUDGE BLASTS W.H. FOR DOJ MEDDLING: LIKE A ‘BANANA REPUBLIC’
 
JimBowie1958 said:
Andrew McCabe should face a firing squad for what he did, IMO. He tried to lead a coup against a duly elected President, and betrayed his office and country.

But Obviously Manafort should rot in solitary confinement for tax issues from decades ago that were not prosecuted and Roger Stone must perish in prion for daring to talk back to Democrats.

And it is going to get worse for everyone who is not a Marxist ideologue as they eventually will get around to everyone else too.
Click to expand...
you are believing a whole lotta bull crud Jim....

have you heard of the phrase that a prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich....?

the Barr appointed prosecutors, for over a year have convened 3 grand juries and no PROSECUTOR could get any of the 3 grand juries to indict McCabe for a crime....because there were no crimes...

the Judge in the case, had it up to the top of his/her head with the bull crap of the prosecutors not charging him, yet holding the investigation opened and not giving him and his family some peace and an end to this illegal harassment crap...

today was the final day, where an FOIA in to their case on mccabe had to be released.... the Judge chewed them a knew asshole for the man at the top pushing this Banana Republic crap.....
 
easyt65 said:
busybee01 said:
QUOTE="easyt65, post: 24059610, member: 55400"]"The Justice Department said Friday it will not pursue criminal charges against former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, after a nearly two-year-long investigation into accusations brought by the agency's independent watchdog who found that he lacked "candor" when questioned about leaking to the media."

** DOJ won't pursue criminal charges against McCabe


The DOJ announced it will not move to Indict former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for his 'lack of candor' during his testimony.

YES, the DOJ just admitted McCabe's part in the failed Obama administration coup attempt, his crime of Omission, fro withholding exculpatory evidence that proved there was no Russian collusion before Mueller had ever been hired as Special Counsel.


'Lack of Candor':
"A lack of candor specifically implies dishonesty by omission… It means that you said nothing when you should have said something. To be more to the point, candor is the quality of being forthcoming, more so than it is being honest."
** https://www.quora.com/What-is-meant-by-lack-of-candor


Hiding / refusing to present exculpatory evidence (evidence proving someone is innocent, information that debunks your lies / false claims) is a 'lack of candor'.

The US IG pointed out that one of the FBI committed FISA Court Abuses was to withhold exculpatory evidence' - through their 'lack of candor' to the FISA Court. Withholding such information is a CRIME!

McCabe was aware of evidence, as other evidence and testimony proves, that debunked the entire Trump claims early on, prior to Mueller being appointed Special Counsel. McCabe knew there was nothing to the 'Russian Collusion Delusion' claims yet withheld that evidence, allowed the entire coup attempt to go forward.....resulting in billions of dollars wasted, false accusations, illegal spying, prosecutorial misconduct , bankrupt / ruined lives when he knew it was all BS.



"“We are pleased that Andrew McCabe and his family can go on with their lives without this cloud hanging over them.”

Yeah, I am so glad another Conspirator gets to go free unscathed after he helped destroy so many lives / families and facilitated the coup by keeping his mouth shut and going along with the coup.
Click to expand...
The DOJ admitted no such thing. They found no evidence of any wrongdoing by McCabe and that is the bottom line
Click to expand...

You, once again, are a proven liar. ThE US IG provided the evidence of McCabe lying under oath on 4 seperate occassions, and the DOJ cited his 'lack of candor' - lying / withholding exculpatory evidence.

Also, 'deciding not to pursue indictment' in NOT the same as declaring McCabe did not break the law as cited by the US IG in its recommendation McCabe be indicted.
Click to expand...
he didnt lie under oath, he lacked candor with the IG.... he wasn't under oath, mr easy peasy liar!

and they pursued criminal charges for a year, with 3 different convening of the grand juries, and found NO CRIMES to indict mccabe for.... the Barr DOJ was harassing him, by keeping the case opened with no crimes found, the Judge chewed them out for it....
 
15th post
busybee01 said:
easyt65 said:
White 6 said:
Looks like the plan to fire McCabe hours before retirement to cheat him out of his retirement and have him charged on "trumped up" charges failed. He is free and clear and will be collecting his $2,000,000 retirement pay after all.
Click to expand...
'trumped up charges'?

The US IG gave evidence of him lying under oath 4 times and leaking classified, which Comey himself testified to under oath.

The DOJ saying it will not pursue Indictment is not the same as saying he is innocent of all charges / accusations.

McCabe withheld exculpatory evidence, helping to bankrupt / destroy other people's / family's lives...the SOB deserved the same and to go to jail.
Click to expand...

The IG gave no evidence of this and clearly the DOJ was unable to find any evidence of this.

Yes he is innocent since he has not been charged. That is how our legal system works.

McCabe withheld nothing. Trump is the one who is responsible for this and he is clearly willing to get help from Russia in 2020 as he did in 2016.
Click to expand...

McCabe has already sued the Justice Department for wrongful dismissal. This year long harrassment of a long-standing highly regarded public servant for simply doing his job, should net him a settlement that will make that pension he was deprived of when he was fired, look like chump change.

Today, the Joint Chiefs of staff said that no action will be taken against Colonel Vindman for testifying against Trump.

And William Barr said that he supported the charges against Roger Stone and the thought the verdict was just.
 
Hope he wins his lawsuit..... and gets his full retirement wrongfully taken from him, back!

this president and his admin, are all crooked, corrupt!!!!!!!
 
The Establishment will protect it's own...................they are dirty to the core............both sides.............

ENJOY THE SHOW.................Pawns will fall before the next election and the show will continue...................scripted of course........................and the pawns that fall are to give the people a kinda of win on taking a few corrupt PEONS OUT.........

 
Care4all said:
Hope he wins his lawsuit..... and gets his full retirement wrongfully taken from him, back!

this president and his admin, are all crooked, corrupt!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

I remember how gleeful Trump was that he had deprived civil servant of his pension. People go into the civil service and work for pay that is a fraction of what they could earn in the private sector. Mueller is from one of the wealthiest families in New England, and could have gone into the family business, just like Trump. Instead, he joined the army, and dedicated his working career to serving his country.

Trump spent his time screwing over banks, subtrades, and investors, and skating out of 4 multi-million dollar bankruptcies with his pockets stuffed with cash. He actually bragged about walking away from his first bankruptcy with $40 million in his pockets.

These are the morals of the people this conman is crucifying, firing, humiliating, and slandering with his lies of wrong-doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Facebook removes 'foreign interference' operations from " russia"

< Previous Thread

VIDEO: FBI Director Wray Reveals Why He Must Be FIRED Immediately

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Conservative from Georgia
NPR Exclusive: Justice Department withheld and removed some Epstein files related to Trump
2
Replies
21
Views
294
Seymour Flops
Seymour Flops
berg80
I thought this would get more attention.
2 3
Replies
53
Views
570
Seymour Flops
Seymour Flops
C_Clayton_Jones
Justice Department withheld and removed some Epstein files related to Trump
2
Replies
24
Views
262
Fort Fun Indiana
Fort Fun Indiana
DonGlock26
Wray FBI opened 1,200 'assessments' of sensitive figures like politicians, journalists and clergy
Replies
7
Views
127
ColonelAngus
ColonelAngus
protectionist
This is what our justice system has descended down to ; and what we must do
Replies
2
Views
111
scruffy
S

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom