Just Over Half of Young Self-Identified Liberals Think Political Violence is Unacceptable

So you must disagree with Trump blowing up people in a boat who might be drug traffickers.

Of course you don't....hypocritical Nazi.
1758304807021.webp
 
To the topic, sometimes the young are stupid. Violence breeds violence. South of the Texas border, we have multiple shining examples of societies that have gone down the violence route, and its a never ending bloodbath.
 
14 pages of nonsense right wing jerkoffs. LOL. You guys crack me up. I wonder if you’ll ever learn?
 
It's a common tactic of gangs and cults to target the youth, in particular those that are isolated and confused...not surprised to see that's the key target of the Demafascsit
 
Probably, it's an eye for an eye. Conservative racists should ask themselves why they support violence.

Someone said "racists in America such as Charlie Kirk had nothing to do with political violence and didn't support violence." That's false.

👉 Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, has been widely documented to have promoted rhetoric rooted in racism and white supremacy.

He dismissed systemic racism, white privilege, and critical race theory, and aligned with Christian nationalist and white supremacist ideologies. Kirk's rhetoric frequently framed immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, and racial justice advocates as threats, fueling division and hostility. He also openly defended gun rights and accepted violence as a "price" of liberty, effectively normalizing it within his ideological framework. This normalization created a political culture that tolerated racial fear and violence, which contributed to an escalating cycle of political violence in the U.S. Kirk himself was assassinated in a politically charged shooting, a grim outcome connected to the environment of division and violence he perpetuated.

While Kirk and his supporters often rejected direct calls for violence, the rhetoric and ideological extremism associated with him helped foster an atmosphere where political violence became more prevalent and normalized. Political analysts and scholars of political violence emphasize that such figures contribute indirectly to political violence through their divisive and incendiary rhetoric, even if they do not explicitly endorse violent acts. This environment escalates tensions and legitimizes violence by some extremists as a form of political expression.

Therefore, it is inaccurate to claim that Charlie Kirk and similar figures had nothing to do with political violence or did not support it in some form, especially considering the broader impact of their rhetoric and ideology on the political climate in America.thehill+3

sources:

1. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5510491-democratic-leaders-charlie-kirk-resolution/
2. ‘This will not end here’: A scholar explains why Charlie Kirk’s killing could embolden political violence
3. https://www.npr.org/2025/09/11/nx-s1-5537908/political-violence-charlie-kirk
4. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...illing-could-embolden-more-political-violence
5. https://racism.org/articles/defining-racism/white-privilege/12835-charlie-kirk-white-supremacist
6. https://www.cato.org/blog/americans...e-expression-after-assassination-charlie-kirk
7. https://wordinblack.com/2025/09/charlie-kirk-assassination-america/
8. https://www.vox.com/culture/461857/charlie-kirk-assassination-political-ideology-tyler-robinson
9. https://wordinblack.com/2025/09/racism-rhetoric-charlie-kirk-reality/
10. https://www.politico.com/news/magaz...k-political-violence-expert-analysis-00558638
11. https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52960-charlie-kirk-americans-political-violence-poll
12. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/...k-murder-and-the-crisis-of-political-violence
13. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-vance-lawmakers-react-shooting-charlie-kirk/story?id=125452435
14. https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/14/us/political-violence-cases-america-charlie-kirk
15. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0r5y33pj5o
16.
17. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-charlie-kirk-free-speech-first-amendment/
18. https://mikejohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2684

I’m sure when you scoured the internet for leftist blogs, you felt better about yourself finding hit pieces targeting Kirk.
 
It's a common tactic of gangs and cults to target the youth, in particular those that are isolated and confused...not surprised to see that's the key target of the Demafascsit
They also target the lowlifes and misfits, the “furry” groupies, trannies, pedos, flaming gays who tend to be easily manipulated.
 
First of all the Pelosi hubby .... someone took a hammer to him
Case was full of very secretive misleading facts.
Easy enough to figure out.The Left and no bigger leftie than
Madame Cruella Pelosi pulled strings like she always did,
making sure the incident was suppressed { Facts not explained }
and Police Reports stalled.
The Exact opposite of what a Police report should explain.
Plus where were the Police and Video camera of the home
where this took place.Or why a back door was NOT Locked.
I realize it's hopeless to expect you to answer a question but please tell us how blob jr. tweeting a hammer has anything to do with that.
 
I realize it's hopeless to expect you to answer a question but please tell us how blob jr. tweeting a hammer has anything to do with that.
Who was "tweetiing a hammer" and what does that mean?

It's hopeless to expect a low IQ leftist to actually string words into coherent sentences.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom