- Mar 31, 2009
- 106,031
- 89,033
- 3,605
yes, that was just recently....17 is not under the age of consent....and it turns out he didn't contact the 17 year old for sex.....who would have thunk it?
Oh give it up the one girl was 15. You people need to stop your lying to people that know better
and had NOTHING at all with their discussion.
no twisting and turning will change that...
You're twisting and turning like a tumbleweed and trying to defend a pedo. That speaks volumes of your integrity. Now scram, you disgust me