I did take my OP a bit out of context, eh?
I'd still like to know why it seems like humanity seems to have something against helping each other out as a group when helping each other out as individuals seems so noble.
Not sure I get your last question. Isn't what is going on in Haiti an example of groups helping a group? And don't most people want to help, in some way?
Re your OP, I heard a pastor say once that an important theme in that passage is Judas's reaction to the woman's having anointed Jesus. Judas scolded her for wasting valuable perfume that he said could have been sold to help the poor. (Sound familiar?)
Jesus's reply was that she had done a beautiful thing, in that JC would not be corporeally among us forever, while the poor would be.
So why will there always be poor among us? Hard luck, I suppose. Laziness in some cases, and a willingness to be poor, a carelessness in not having been born well. Bad decisions. Addictions to whatever. Oh and being money-stupid. ("A fool and his money are lucky enough to get together in the first place.")
I can't recall which GOP politician said it, maybe Kemp or Gingrich, but one thing we can aim for is not to have the
same poor always among us, meaning we can help lift from poverty those who have fallen into it.
Why is there goodness in the world?