Zone1 No one is saved

[OneIsTheWord]

You are horrible at communicating. It's not worth the time to try to figure out what you are saying. You are like breezewood. Get some interpersonal skill

Question was Christ a dical man?

 

[ding]

Question was Christ a dical man?

I don't know what dical means. What does dical mean?

 

[BreezeWood]

was Christ a dical man?

there has never been or ever will be a messiah made in the heavens for any reason or purpose in regards to saving a select few or a universal consideration - self determination is inviolable.

 

[BreezeWood]

you are unable to respond to what you deliberately purge without reason that retards your ability to communicate in open discussion.

Do you realize how incoherent that sentence is? I asked you a simple question. Do you believe you have to earn your way into heaven? Because it certainly sounds like you are saying one must do certain things. I'm not being difficult. You are.

the heavenly goal granted a&e by their choice for self determination than servitude and denial - to triumph good vs evil - is their means to attain judgement when accomplished for admission to the everlasting.

as is the catalyst for the 1st century events, repudiation of judaism false commandments et al and taught by jesus, the spoken religion of antiquity.

 

[Ace Nova]

the heavenly goal granted a&e by their choice for self determination than servitude and denial - to triumph good vs evil - is their means to attain judgement when accomplished for admission to the everlasting.

as is the catalyst for the 1st century events, repudiation of judaism false commandments et al and taught by jesus, the spoken religion of antiquity.

How do you view the Laws of Nature?

 

[ding]

the heavenly goal granted a&e by their choice for self determination than servitude and denial - to triumph good vs evil - is their means to attain judgement when accomplished for admission to the everlasting.

Which tells me nothing. Because there is no account of Adam and Eve triumphing over evil. How did Adam and Eve triumph over evil?

as is the catalyst for the 1st century events, repudiation of judaism false commandments et al and taught by jesus, the spoken religion of antiquity.

This is as incoherent as your previous post. Can't you speak in simple English. Try making short declarative statements.

 

[OneIsTheWord]

there has never been or ever will be a messiah made in the heavens for any reason or purpose in regards to saving a select few or a universal consideration - self determination is inviolable.

was Christ our lord, Radical?

 

[BreezeWood]

was Christ our lord, Radical?

the time for reason, the 1st century events -

all three desert religions are based on a single claim by one individual, abraham that they had a conversation with a heavenly deity that they were special and of their favor - a lie promoted by the tribe who chose abraham's claim over the truth - 1000 years earlier, noah of the true heavenly commitment that self determination is the sole means for admission to the everlasting.

the 1st century events, jesus is the repudiation of judaism and the false claims of preferential treatment made by abraham and their tribal loyalists.

 

[Cougarbear]

this is just what the ending will be for the sinners, desert dwellers - the triumph of evil - if they are the final triumph and all are the same as them, the desert bibles.

those true to the 1st century who gave their lives for liberation theology, self determination will have all passed as did jesus or rather with their triumph - the triumph of good - all will be met with gratitude from the heavens and live in peace till their next challenge.

the truth not revealed in the corrupt desert bibles ...

So, which Bible is it corrupt? Share this with us. If not, stop lying to yourself

 

[BreezeWood]

So, which Bible is it corrupt? Share this with us. If not, stop lying to yourself

all three desert religions are based on a single claim by one individual, abraham that they had a conversation with a heavenly deity that they were special and of their favor - a lie promoted by the tribe who chose abraham's claim over the truth -

- you have a reading disorder that has progressed that leaves your comments vacant of any substance.

 

[Cougarbear]

- you have a reading disorder that has progressed that leaves your comments vacant of any substance.

So, you believe that Abraham chose Ismael? You are insane. You claim to believe in God yet have never shared your references. You knock on everyone else’s beliefs but have nothing to replace their beliefs with. You are the one with no substance. By the way, Moses abridged the time from Adam down to himself with the help of the Urim and Thumum seer stones he received from God.

 

[BreezeWood]

Moses abridged the time from Adam

the heavens abridge from adam to noah - there are no heavenly religions past that time ... the desert religions are all fictitious.

 

[Cougarbear]

the heavens abridge from adam to noah - there are no heavenly religions past that time ... the desert religions are all fictitious.

Then you should not have any problems supplying us with your oral or written abridged documents for proof.

 

[BreezeWood]

Then you should not have any problems supplying us with your oral or written abridged documents for proof.

what makes you believe anything you have concerning the desert religions is nothing more than a puff of smoke - relying on a single individual 2000 bce years ago, abraham without a shred of evidence for a single of their claims.

 

[Cougarbear]

what makes you believe anything you have concerning the desert religions is nothing more than a puff of smoke - relying on a single individual 2000 bce years ago, abraham without a shred of evidence for a single of their claims.

First, there is plenty of evidence of the existence of Old and New Testament persons, places and things. What you don't have is even an abridgement of your pathetic moldy religion oral or written. So, if you are going to mudsling, you might first want to have mud to sling with. Otherwise, you simply have mud on your face. Which you do. Now, provide your proof. If not, just admit you are full of hot air and a cranky old has been.

 

[BreezeWood]

First, there is plenty of evidence of the existence of Old and New Testament persons, places and things.

- relying on a single individual 2000 bce years ago, abraham without a shred of evidence for a single of their claims.

are you a historian what's in those documents is all there is trite historical enactments what there is not is a shred of evidence verifying a single claim made by abraham ... no reason to have faith in an allegation as that is the goal of the person making the fictitious claim to endear themselves through devious means.

without their false claims all three desert religions cease to exist.

not so the heavenly parables as noahs, the means to accomplish judgement and admission to the everlasting.

 

[Cougarbear]

are you a historian what's in those documents is all there is trite historical enactments what there is not is a shred of evidence verifying a single claim made by abraham ... no reason to have faith in an allegation as that is the goal of the person making the fictitious claim to endear themselves through devious means.

without their false claims all three desert religions cease to exist.

not so the heavenly parables as noahs, the means to accomplish judgement and admission to the everlasting.

Trying to avoid the obvious hypocrisy you spew with every breathe doesn’t help your arguments. None of your arguments work because they are based on the abridgment of Moses. The more you hypocrisies the more you prove the truth of the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament

 

[BreezeWood]

None of your arguments work because they are based on the abridgment of Moses.

what there is not is a shred of evidence verifying a single claim made by abraham ... no reason to have faith in an allegation as that is the goal of the person making the fictitious claim to endear themselves through devious means.

that is correct, both abraham and moses are liars without a shred of evidence for any of their claims and rely on the equally evil to support their duplicity ... c-bear.

provide your evidence for any of their claims or remove them and all else without proof from the desert bibles - and there will be nothing of the false religions left and at best will be mediocre books of history.

 

[Cougarbear]

that is correct, both abraham and moses are liars without a shred of evidence for any of their claims and rely on the equally evil to support their duplicity ... c-bear.

provide your evidence for any of their claims or remove them and all else without proof from the desert bibles - and there will be nothing of the false religions left and at best will be mediocre books of history.

If you believe a book to be false, then why do you attack persons and personages in the book and call them liars? If they didn't exist, then they could not have spoken or written anything and therefore cannot be liars. Your attack on the Bible is therefore null-in-voided. Your logic and reasoning is therefore null-in-voided. The only thing remaining is that the Bible is true as far as it is translated correctly. The Book of Mormon is True. The Pear of Great Price is true. The Doctrine and Covenants is true. BreezeWood's beliefs are logically false.

 

[BreezeWood]

If you believe a book to be false, then why do you attack persons and personages in the book and call them liars?

you are a joke -

the very purpose of the liars, moses and abraham are to use the heavens for their own nefarious purposes, the same as c-bear and their complicity using the corruptions - as false commandments, hereditary idolatry, religions of apartheid, false heavenly personifications - for their own purposes. the true history of those religions than what is written inside them.