JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith’s DC Jan 6 Case, Citing ‘Presidential Immunity’

[MAGA Macho Man]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[g5000]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

There is no double jeopardy. The DC indictment charges are not the same as the impeachment articles.

 

[Independent thinker]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

They don't care how far over their head things are. Orange man bad. Must get Trump.

 

[Moonglow]

There is no double jeopardy. The DC indictment charges are not the same as the impeachment articles.

They simply have no idea how it works.

 

[Moonglow]

They don't care how far over their head things are. Orange man bad. Must get Trump.

His make up is atrocious

 

[Mac1958]

There is no double jeopardy. The DC indictment charges are not the same as the impeachment articles.

It's kitchen sink time for the orange buffoon.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Good luck with that

 

[g5000]

This just in: Trump legally changes name to David Dennison, files motion to dismiss all charges against him since he isn't Donald Trump.

 

[rampart]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

presidential immunity?" is that in article 2? or did another soon to be disbarred lawyer just make this up as well?

 

[Rawley]

There is no double jeopardy. The DC indictment charges are not the same as the impeachment articles.

THey didn't argue double jeopardy

 

[wamose]

Jack Smith is a classless, corrupt, politically biased lowlife that is using this bogus prosecution to prevent Trump from being elected President. It's nothing more than election tampering, as are the other cases against Trump. So they'll all put on their make-believe robes and do their best to destroy Trump's campaign because it scares them to think Trump is capable of restoring America to greatness. They don't want that because they don't like the USA. Fuck these criminal prosecutions. MAGA

 

[Lakhota]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

That is HILARIOUS!.

Trump Asks For Jan. 6 Dismissal Because Coup Attempt Was Part Of His Official Duties​

His lawyers asked federal judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the four-count felony indictment because Trump’s actions are protected by "presidential immunity."

Trump Requests Jan. 6 Charges Be Dismissed Due To So-Called 'Presidential Immunity'

His lawyers asked federal judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the four-count felony indictment because Trump’s actions are protected by "presidential immunity."

www.huffpost.com

 

[Catsnmeters]

Jack Smith is a classless, corrupt, politically biased lowlife that is using this bogus prosecution to prevent Trump from being elected President. It's nothing more than election tampering, as are the other cases against Trump. So they'll all put on their make-believe robes and do their best to destroy Trump's campaign because it scares them to think Trump is capable of restoring America to greatness. They don't want that because they don't like the USA. Fuck these criminal prosecutions. MAGA

Bogus indictments? Which one?

 

[Dragonlady]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

He’s tried this a number of times with a number of his recent legal cases, including the Jean E. Carroll case. It hasn’t worked before and it won’t work now

 

[d0gbreath]

 

[BlueGin]

Good luck with that

Right. Since Democrats don’t obey laws.

 

[BlindBoo]

“The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate,” the lawyers wrote according to ABC News. “Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct… The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate.”

Trump is innocent. Jack Smith is in over his head. Presidential Immunity is the key.

JUST IN: Trump Files Motion to Dismiss Jack Smith's DC Jan 6 Case, Citing 'Presidential Immunity' | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

President Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss Special Counsel Jack Smith’s DC case, citing ‘presidential immunity.’ Last month Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Keep hoping. Here's what the old turtle said:

"He did not do his job. He didn't take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed and order restored," he continued.

"No. Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily — happily — as the chaos unfolded," he said. "Even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in serious danger."

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell noted this just moments after voting to acquit Trump, saying the courts are the proper forum for holding the former president accountable for his role in the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office as an ordinary citizen,” McConnell said on the Senate floor. “He didn’t get away with anything. Yet.”

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Right. Since Democrats don’t obey laws.

Who’s under indictment?

 

[BlueGin]

Who’s under indictment?

Not a member of the house.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Not a member of the house.

Yeah, that’s what I thought….