Just imagine if democrats decided Trump didn’t really win a red state and they commissioned their own audit

[eddiew37]

So much cheating, and yet brain dead republicans couldn't put ALL the info before judges?? You sick pos Putin will eat your lunch like he did the orange swine

 

[badbob85037]

First you have to look at both sides. The Repugs are a bunch of snivelin worthless cowards. On the other hand you have evil godless shit that will never stop stinking or want to.

 

[Orangecat]

If Trump won any state by cheating, I'd fully support it being exposed and reversed.

Really? 'cause shit don't really add up in Texas.

So conduct an audit.

 

[Orangecat]

that doesnt somehow mean you would trust democrats to expose it. if this AZ audit never happened and democrats did it instead. you would freak the fuck out.

I only care about the truth, kid.

 

[hunarcy]

That’s how ridiculous the Republican-led audit in Arizona is.

Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and democrats decided to do an audit of Florida in 2016 as a desperate attempt to make Hillary president.

How would republicans react?

Same as I'm reacting to the Arizona audit...reserving judgement until results are published.

How many results do you need ??

All of them, not just the ones you like.

62 court cases and counting Which one do you have a problem with?

Not talking about the legal cases...talking about auditing the actual results to insure accuracy.

Oh, btw, you are aware there WERE audits in 2016, right? In Michigan, for example, they audited the election because Trump won Michigan However, the irregularities found were mostly in Wayne County, which Hillary took. Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

Republicans didn't object then. Why do you object now?

 

[forkup]

That’s how ridiculous the Republican-led audit in Arizona is.

Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and democrats decided to do an audit of Florida in 2016 as a desperate attempt to make Hillary president.

How would republicans react?

Same as I'm reacting to the Arizona audit...reserving judgement until results are published.

How many results do you need ??

All of them, not just the ones you like.

62 court cases and counting Which one do you have a problem with?

Not talking about the legal cases...talking about auditing the actual results to insure accuracy.

Oh, btw, you are aware there WERE audits in 2016, right? In Michigan, for example, they audited the election because Trump won Michigan However, the irregularities found were mostly in Wayne County, which Hillary took. Records: Too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts

Republicans didn't object then. Why do you object now?

-We object because of this fact. Last challenge to Maricopa County election results tossed by judge
-We object because of this fact. Maricopa County Election Facts | Voting Equipment & Accuracy | Maricopa County, AZ
-We object because of this fact. The Madness of the Maricopa County Election Audit | National Review

Nonetheless, in February, the county enlisted two professional, certified elections-equipment companies to analyze the oft-voiced concerns regarding the Dominion tabulation software and hardware. The county asked the two election companies to do everything necessary to:

• Analyze hacking vulnerabilities of both the tabulation hardware and software
• Verify that no malware had been installed to the tabulators
• Determine if the tabulators had connected to the Internet at any point before, during, or after the election
• Assess if any vote switching occurred as a result of the tabulators

Both companies used methodologies honed over the course of hundreds of previous examinations. Neither company found problems with the tabulators. Their reports are available online.

-We object because of the fact that the previous audits were asked for by the bipartisan election commission and this one is called for by the GOP who tapped a company that has no discernable expertise in performing audits. And the guy who actually is the boss of this particular company is on record saying this.

Something that makes it clear that the whole intention of this is not discerning actual facts but rather trying to find something ... anything to cast doubt on the result.