Julie Swetnick, the new accuser

[Pop23]

He was a wild frat boy at 15?

He was in training

I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom.
We would have been 15 or 16.
Was pretty much disgusted with the bunch of 'em who bragged about it at school the following week.

So you are guilty of not reporting a rape?

Yeah, and we are supposed to believe you? It's just as easy to conclude that you participated in it. See how that works creep?

Had I believed it was a rape, I'd certainly have reported it. But this girl had a history of doing the same thing at one other party at least.

She liked to ****. You didn't know girls like that in high school?

So a "train" isn't a "rape," then, in that case. If she was doing it voluntarily, that's a different kettle of fish.

She was drunk. We now know what "Dr" considers "Love"

 

[Cecilie1200]

Julie Swetnick: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
---------------------------------------

Wow this is serious business, if true.

Laughable. If she knew what was happening at this parties, why did she attend 10 of them? I smell bullshit. I also smell creepy porn lawyer which is a worse smell than wet clown or dog.

I was going to go with 'backed-up septic tank'.

 

[OldLady]

So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.

If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.

That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.

I'm really sorry to hear that.

 

[DrLove]

once again, your statement:

"I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom."

I never added that dipshit, it's your statement.

So, women who can't legally consent can be raped?

Do go on.

I admitted that while I assumed that she was probably drinking, I didn't know for sure that she was drunk.
Again - take it to someone who actually cares about the thoughts that fly out of your squirming brain.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

He was in training

I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom.
We would have been 15 or 16.
Was pretty much disgusted with the bunch of 'em who bragged about it at school the following week.

So you are guilty of not reporting a rape?

Yeah, and we are supposed to believe you? It's just as easy to conclude that you participated in it. See how that works creep?

Had I believed it was a rape, I'd certainly have reported it. But this girl had a history of doing the same thing at one other party at least.

She liked to ****. You didn't know girls like that in high school?

So a "train" isn't a "rape," then, in that case. If she was doing it voluntarily, that's a different kettle of fish.

She was drunk. We now know what "Dr" considers "Love"

Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were allegedly "present" at these parties; Swetnick does not claim Kavanaugh assaulted her or participated in the gang rapes, nor does she name a single person beyond Kavanaugh and Judge. Not a single corroborating witness has come forward to support these wild claims that somehow escaped six FBI background checks.

Kavanaugh has issued a forceful denial, saying they are "from the Twilight Zone" and does not know Julie Swetnick.

 

[Baz Ares]

Since there is no down side to her lying, and no way to prove anything she says....it is time to take the vote...end this vile, democrat character assassination...and remember this in November......if they are willing to go this far against Kavanaugh, imagine what they will now do if they get power.... They are done with playing the politics game and it is all out in the open..... get in their way and nothing is off the table....

My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim

So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.

If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.

That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.

I'm really sorry to hear that.

He should have stopped it

 

[Asclepias]

So you cant answer why they dont already have their timeline synced?

I did, can't read?

No you didnt. You just said one was waiting on the other to provide a clue about the timeline. I said if they were part of some setup then wouldnt they already have their timeline straight?

They cannot reveal the timeline up front because then Kav could find alibis. They are vague on purpose. If they say it was Feb 12th, 1982 and Kav's mom has proof that they were away in Cali or something then he has an alibi.

Ford has to reveal the timeline first. Youre not making any sense.

And she has not. They are being vague on purpose or they just cannot recall as it was so long ago.

Thats right she has not. So if this was a setup why hasnt she revealed one?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As long as there are no consequences for making these false allegations, they will never end

What makes you think they’re false? Doesn’t Brett Kavanaugh in his yearbook corroborate a lot of this new information?

They're false because she's lying

 

[Asclepias]

So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.

If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.

That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.

Why didn't you stop it?

Didnt want to get shot over some white girl that probably wouldnt report being raped.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I did, can't read?

No you didnt. You just said one was waiting on the other to provide a clue about the timeline. I said if they were part of some setup then wouldnt they already have their timeline straight?

They cannot reveal the timeline up front because then Kav could find alibis. They are vague on purpose. If they say it was Feb 12th, 1982 and Kav's mom has proof that they were away in Cali or something then he has an alibi.

Ford has to reveal the timeline first. Youre not making any sense.

And she has not. They are being vague on purpose or they just cannot recall as it was so long ago.

Thats right she has not. So if this was a setup why hasnt she revealed one?

Revealed what?

 

[Pop23]

Hmm? More info.

View attachment 218669

And she had no knowledge of Kavanaugh participating............

But Dr.Love on the other hand.........

 

[Indeependent]

Since there is no down side to her lying, and no way to prove anything she says....it is time to take the vote...end this vile, democrat character assassination...and remember this in November......if they are willing to go this far against Kavanaugh, imagine what they will now do if they get power.... They are done with playing the politics game and it is all out in the open..... get in their way and nothing is off the table....

My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim

So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for sex, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way the lord plans their lives.

So attending drunk/rape get gatherings is overall cool by you?

 

[DrLove]

He was in training

I remember a party my sophomore year in high school where a bunch of boys pulled a train on a drunk girl in the back bedroom.
We would have been 15 or 16.
Was pretty much disgusted with the bunch of 'em who bragged about it at school the following week.

So you are guilty of not reporting a rape?

Yeah, and we are supposed to believe you? It's just as easy to conclude that you participated in it. See how that works creep?

Had I believed it was a rape, I'd certainly have reported it. But this girl had a history of doing the same thing at one other party at least.

She liked to ****. You didn't know girls like that in high school?

So a "train" isn't a "rape," then, in that case. If she was doing it voluntarily, that's a different kettle of fish.

She was drunk. We now know what "Dr" considers "Love"

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.

If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.

That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.

Why didn't you stop it?

Didnt want to get shot.

LMAO. Fair enough.

I've been shot while wearing a vest. It kills like a MOTHER F*CKER!!! I can only imagine the pain w/o one.

 

[Lewdog]

It appears in Maryland there is not a statute of limitations for rape. Would be pretty interesting if we had a sitting Supreme Court Justice get indicted for rape.

This new accuser has given her statement under oath... it would be a felony if she was proven to have lied.

She does not have direct proof. She just said Kav and Judge were at these parties. Never saw them be the "rapists".

She said she was raped by them.

 

[Asclepias]

So, she saw that other girls were being drugged and raped and thought it was a good idea to keep attending these parties?

She too somehow thought Kavanaugh was fit to be a federal judge at lower levels but SCOTUS is a line that can’t be crossed?

This all smells like bullshit. At least they found a liar willing to lie in an affidavit.

This is the part I don't get.

If you've read her affidavit, she would have been a lot more believable if she had stopped with the general overall demeanor of Kavanaugh being aggressive toward the girls, etc., and left the line of boys waiting to gang rape a drugged girl out of it. That's the part I'm having trouble with, not the rest, which fits with what the others have reported.

That gang rape line thing happens alot. I've seen it personally.

I'm really sorry to hear that.

Its really sickening but without knowing the girls intentions its not something that you can do much about.

 

[Pop23]

Since there is no down side to her lying, and no way to prove anything she says....it is time to take the vote...end this vile, democrat character assassination...and remember this in November......if they are willing to go this far against Kavanaugh, imagine what they will now do if they get power.... They are done with playing the politics game and it is all out in the open..... get in their way and nothing is off the table....

My question is why didn't she report this 40 years ago when it happened. She sounds more like Ford and Ramirez.

She was also under aged at that time just like Ford.

If this really happened then she should have reported it then. Not 40 years later.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.

they should vote on Friday.

Maybe because she thought she would be harassed and nobody would believe her

Some people (conservatives) actually blame the victim

So DOPer godly folks blame the victims for giving out sex services, rather than the priest who raped them.
Hmm? As well it seems. As the priest are still on the job.
god I love the way a lord plans their lives.

DrLove is no GOPer, and he said there are plenty of girls that like to get drunk and pull trains.

I don't believe it myself, but that is what the Doc says.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It appears in Maryland there is not a statute of limitations for rape. Would be pretty interesting if we had a sitting Supreme Court Justice get indicted for rape.

This new accuser has given her statement under oath... it would be a felony if she was proven to have lied.

She does not have direct proof. She just said Kav and Judge were at these parties. Never saw them be the "rapists".

She said she was raped by them.

She actually did not.

Andrew Kugle on Twitter

 

[MarcATL]

Everyone cares about sexual assault when it really happens.

I doubt any of these women were sexually assaulted. Oh and they waited 36 years to report it??

Fishy. Fishy. Fishy.

What's the cut off year for it to be credible to you Claudette ?