- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #41
Of course Judge strikes down North Carolina ultrasound abortion law
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Propaganda which was debunked years ago.
a ultrasound is propaganda???? Where do you think babies come for you evil bitch?
Always need to lie to yourself about the evil you support ?Propaganda which was debunked years ago.
a ultrasound is propaganda???? Where do you think babies come for you evil bitch?
That isn't an ultrasound. Its an abortion, speeded up, and its made to make you believe that the fetus is aware it is being killed. It isn't.
I am sorry where in the constitution does it say doctors cant show women ultrasounds before committing infanticide again? Just because some liberal judge loves dead babies doesn't mean it it was unconstitutional.if you dont like it move to another state you tard... Still small government. Even though you will never understand that since your a fascist who supports more dead babies. Hitler has nothing on you progressives when it comes to mass killings.
This also doesnt make any sense.
Small government is perfectly capable of enacting measures offensive to the Constitution, this invalidated North Carolina law is proof of that.
The law required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and place the image in the woman's line of sight. The fetus would then be described in detail, even if the woman asked the provider not to.
I am sorry where in the constitution does it say doctors cant show women ultrasounds before committing infanticide again? Just because some liberal judge loves dead babies doesn't mean it it was unconstitutional.This also doesnt make any sense.
Small government is perfectly capable of enacting measures offensive to the Constitution, this invalidated North Carolina law is proof of that.
The law required abortion providers to perform an ultrasound and place the image in the woman's line of sight. The fetus would then be described in detail, even if the woman asked the provider not to.
Where does the Constitution give the state the authority to force medical providers to perform a medical procedure, thus forcing that procedure on a patient.
It doesnt.
This law is heinous, barbaric, reprehensible, and un-Constitutional, and it was struck down accordingly and appropriately.
The "fetus" feels pain
Always need to lie to yourself about the evil you support ?a ultrasound is propaganda???? Where do you think babies come for you evil bitch?
That isn't an ultrasound. Its an abortion, speeded up, and its made to make you believe that the fetus is aware it is being killed. It isn't.
It would promote childbirth, at the expense of the Bill of Rights.
Not worth it IMO.
Because that child doesn't deserve protection right?
It is not a child, nor is it a baby or a person, as ones rights manifest only after he is born:
After analyzing the usage of "person" in the Constitution, the Court concluded that that word "has application only postnatally." Id., at 157. Commenting on the contingent property interests of the unborn that are generally represented by guardians ad litem, the Court noted: "Perfection of the interests involved, again, has generally been contingent upon live birth. In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense." Id., at 162. Accordingly, an abortion is not "the termination of life entitled to Fourteenth Amendment protection." Id., at 159. From this holding, there was no dissent, see id., at 173; indeed, no member of the Court has ever questioned this fundamental proposition. Thus, as a matter of federal constitutional law, a developing organism that is not yet a "person" does not have what is sometimes described as a "right to life."
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
Hypoocrite, thy name is knee jerk right wingers.
[/QUOT
And not one Dem fall under your broad brush strokes do they?nor does every Conservative believe what you believe they do.
Its kinda a hoot,but pathetic at the same time,people like this one,blubber about death penalty,for convicted killers,blubber about having an army for protection,yet reveal in their ability to kill the most innocent,and vulnerable. I'd say that way fucked up!!
The constitution doesn't give rights it keeps government from from infringing on them like this liberal judge did
The constitution doesn't give rights it keeps government from from infringing on them like this liberal judge did
Whose rights did the judge infringe on, dipshit? The "rights" of male Republican legislators to force their will on women?
The constitution doesn't give rights it keeps government from from infringing on them like this liberal judge did
Whose rights did the judge infringe on, dipshit? The "rights" of male Republican legislators to force their will on women?
The child's right to life
tapatalk post
Whose rights did the judge infringe on, dipshit? The "rights" of male Republican legislators to force their will on women?
The child's right to life
tapatalk post
Its not a child.
Whose rights did the judge infringe on, dipshit? The "rights" of male Republican legislators to force their will on women?
The child's right to life
tapatalk post
Its not a child.
The child's right to life
tapatalk post
Its not a child.
LOL so what is it then,and don't forget while your were growing,you where just what you deny
The stupid just flows out of you huh hot dog boy. next comes the nazi talk right?The child's right to life
tapatalk post
Its not a child.
We know how you democrats think it hasn't changed in since you were confederated. First it is ******* are not human now it is the unborn are not a human child. Your guys evil knows no bounds.
tapatalk post