Judge Schedules Hearing on Allegations of DA Fani Willis’ ‘Improper Use of Funds’ and ‘Scandalous’ Affair with Trump Prosecutor

[kyzr]

An American....assassinated. DOJ whipped up a memo justifying the assassination without ever convicting Awlaki.
Never was challenged AFAIK.
Beyond that, I thought US Gov't weren't assassinating anymore.

Its not like the CIA shot him here in the US.
If the Obama admin has proof he was a terrorist, I'm fine killing him and saving US lives.
You can't have a public trial for a terrorist before you kill him.

 

[Dragonlady]

Oh I agree......but this legal and Constitutional thing.....Obama wacking two Americans without any form of due process comes to mind.

And yet NOBODY filed any charges, Republicans didn't try to impeach him. All of which makes a lie out of Trump's hysterical allegations that limits on the Presidency prevents the President from acting.

It ONLY prevents him/her from acting illegally.

 

[Delldude]

Its not like the CIA shot him here in the US.
If the Obama admin has proof he was a terrorist, I'm fine killing him and saving US lives.
You can't have a public trial for a terrorist before you kill him.

So Trump loses the immunity issue, then Obama's fair game.

 

[Delldude]

And yet NOBODY filed any charges,

If a prez doesn't have blanket immunity......Obama could be challenged.

 

[Dragonlady]

1. Letitia's case is malicious. We have her on video saying she will get Trump and be a "pain in the ass". That is NOT how the Law works.
2. Fani and her lover, who went to the WH to coordinate the prosecution is also malicious prosecution.
3. Smith's cases are very weak. J6 is gone. The only case with any merit is the classified document case, and people convicted of that like Sandy Berger, lost their security clearance, no prison time. Joe Biden actually stole classified documents and wasn't even charged with a crime. Trump has the Presidential Records Act to get him out of trouble.

1. How is this "threat" any different than Rudy Gulliani threatening to indict members of the MAFIA. ALL prosecutors run on a platform of cleaning up crime in New York, and Donald Trump has openly bragged about all of the politicians he's bribed in New York, and openly flouted the tax laws,

Furthermore Trump was indicted by TWO different Grand Juries in New York. After he bragged to the media for years about everything he was "getting away with". Now that he's not "getting away" with this stuff, it's all so "unfair".

 

[Dragonlady]

So Trump loses the immunity issue, then Obama's fair game.

If you think Obama committed crimes while in office, give it a go and see how far you get in prosecuting Obama.

Don't forget you have to prove "criminal intent. That what Obama was doing was illegal, he knew it was illegal, and he did it anyway.

Good luck with that!

That's easy to prove with Trump because he keeps going on TV and admitting to everything. He just claims that because he was President, NOTHING he did illegal, or it was "his job" to look into election fraud. No it wasn't. It was the states' job to look into election fraud, which they did, and found NONE.

 

[Dragonlady]

1. Letitia's case is malicious. We have her on video saying she will get Trump and be a "pain in the ass". That is NOT how the Law works.
2. Fani and her lover, who went to the WH to coordinate the prosecution is also malicious prosecution.
3. Smith's cases are very weak. J6 is gone. The only case with any merit is the classified document case, and people convicted of that like Sandy Berger, lost their security clearance, no prison time. Joe Biden actually stole classified documents and wasn't even charged with a crime. Trump has the Presidential Records Act to get him out of trouble.

How is this any different from Rudy Gulliani telling the citizens of New York he was going after the Mafia?

You fail to acknowledge Trump's long history of illegal behaviour and questionable financial dealings which have gone on since the 1980's

Your defense of Trump's long history of criminal behaviour is laughable. The man was in the middle of a $100+ million fraud trial when he ran for President the first time.

Smith's cases are strong as steel. Members of Trump's FAMILY testified against him at the GJ Hearings. Added to which, Trump keeps going on TV, committing more crimes by threatening prosecutors and judges, and whipping up the Cult to go on the attack, proving how dangerously unhinged he really is.

 

[Nostra]

The only dam about to break is Trump is going to be found guilty in every trial he's involved in.

The people of New York have been FURIOUS that Trump hasn't been prosecuted before now. I've been watching Trump since the 1980's flout every financial law imagineably and couldn't believe the stuff he got away with.

This isn't "malicious prosecution" at all. This is the take down of a large scale financial criminal who should never have been elected President.

You shoulda called the cops, Vermin.

 

[Nostra]

Your fanatical obsession with Trump is noted.

She has a crush on him.

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Update!



Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade splurged on lavish trips with Fani Willis while ex-wife struggled ‘without any means of financial support’: court docs

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

She has a crush on him.

Biggly!

 

[Nostra]

How is this any different from Rudy Gulliani telling the citizens of New York he was going after the Mafia?

You fail to acknowledge Trump's long history of illegal behaviour and questionable financial dealings which have gone on since the 1980's

Your defense of Trump's long history of criminal behaviour is laughable. The man was in the middle of a $100+ million fraud trial when he ran for President the first time.

Smith's cases are strong as steel. Members of Trump's FAMILY testified against him at the GJ Hearings. Added to which, Trump keeps going on TV, committing more crimes by threatening prosecutors and judges, and whipping up the Cult to go on the attack, proving how dangerously unhinged he really is.

Link us up to this “long history of criminal behavior”. He must have dozens of convictions, right? Surely you wouldn’t lie.

 

[Curried Goats]

This case is about to be dismantled and shut down. Fani and her lover are going down for unethical corruption at the highest level.

Judge Schedules Hearing on Allegations of DA Fani Willis' 'Improper Use of Funds' and 'Scandalous' Affair with Trump Investigation Prosecutor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

On Friday, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has slated a mid-February hearing to address explosive allegations against Soros-funded District Attorney Fani Willis, The Epoch Times reported.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

You dumb MAGAts. Its more likely this dipshit defendants lawyer is going to be reprimanded for filing that motion before this case gets thrown out. They provide no evidence nor do they make any sort of rational argument for why it even matters to the facts of the case who Fani Willis is dating.

Update!



Trump prosecutor Nathan Wade splurged on lavish trips with Fani Willis while ex-wife struggled ‘without any means of financial support’: court docs

MSN

www.msn.com

And? He's a successful lawyer. He can spend whatever he wants on his girlfriend.

 

[Delldude]

Furthermore Trump was indicted by TWO different Grand Juries in New York.

During her campaigns, well before Trump was ever indicted for anything, she vociferously declared she was going to get Trump. It was the main mantra in her campaigning.

 

[Delldude]

Don't forget you have to prove "criminal intent. That what Obama was doing was illegal, he knew it was illegal, and he did it anyway.

He gave an order and it was carried out, to murder an American citizen......how much more criminal intent do you need?

 

[Rogue AI]

IMHO the USSC will "split the baby" and say that the president has "limited immunity", meaning something like, if the order was legal and Constitutional then he is immune, if the order was illegal or political then he can be held liable.
So the USSC will have final say on presidential immunity.

More likely a very narrow ruling that will exonerate Trump for this liberal silliness and leave the hypotheticals open for a case by case basis in the future. It's past time to end this judicial activism and bring the hammer down on these kangaroo court proceedings.

 

[MagicMike]

This case is about to be dismantled and shut down. Fani and her lover are going down for unethical corruption at the highest level.

Judge Schedules Hearing on Allegations of DA Fani Willis' 'Improper Use of Funds' and 'Scandalous' Affair with Trump Investigation Prosecutor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

On Friday, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has slated a mid-February hearing to address explosive allegations against Soros-funded District Attorney Fani Willis, The Epoch Times reported.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Yawn
Another mothingburger
This bogus "case" is being brought up by another codefendant in the RICO case.
No big surprise there right?
Just another pissed off indicted felon trying to distract from the evidence against him.

Thegatewaypundit?????

COME ON!

 

[kyzr]

So Trump loses the immunity issue, then Obama's fair game.

I'm sure the courts would give Barrry a pass.

 

[Mack Brazile]

That lil fat fucker, race had nothing to do with it. Keep your fucking legs closed and don't fuck the help.

 

[kyzr]

1. How is this "threat" any different than Rudy Gulliani threatening to indict members of the MAFIA. ALL prosecutors run on a platform of cleaning up crime in New York, and Donald Trump has openly bragged about all of the politicians he's bribed in New York, and openly flouted the tax laws,

Furthermore Trump was indicted by TWO different Grand Juries in New York. After he bragged to the media for years about everything he was "getting away with". Now that he's not "getting away" with this stuff, it's all so "unfair".

Misusing the Law" to get a political opponent is what we here in the US call a Banana Republic.
You Canucks should know about that.