Judge Refers Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio for Criminal Prosecution
- Thread starter Dante
- Start date
pwjohn
Gold Member
Man, you fuckers are coming at me in droves. So I think I'll bow out now.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Yes. Elected officials are different. Nobody ever gets elected telling people the truth.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,689
- 263,974
- 3,615
Will they make Sheriff Joe wear pink panties?
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
‘In making the referral to the United States attorney’s office for criminal contempt charges, Judge G. Murray Snow of Federal District Court in Phoenix delivered the sharpest rebuke against Mr. Arpaio, who as the long-serving sheriff in Maricopa County made a name for himself as an unrelenting pursuer of undocumented immigrants.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan “have a history of obfuscation and subversion of this court’s orders that is as old as this case,” Judge Snow wrote in his order.
Sheriff Arpaio and Mr. Sheridan had also made numerous false statements under oath, Judge Snow wrote, and “there is also probable cause to believe that many if not all of the statements were made in an attempt to obstruct any inquiry into their further wrongdoing or negligence.”’
Arpaio is innocent until proven guilty, of course.
But given the evidence, the facts of the case, and Arpaio’s clear contempt for the rule of law, criminal prosecution is more than warranted.
Sheriff Arpaio and Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan “have a history of obfuscation and subversion of this court’s orders that is as old as this case,” Judge Snow wrote in his order.
Sheriff Arpaio and Mr. Sheridan had also made numerous false statements under oath, Judge Snow wrote, and “there is also probable cause to believe that many if not all of the statements were made in an attempt to obstruct any inquiry into their further wrongdoing or negligence.”’
Arpaio is innocent until proven guilty, of course.
But given the evidence, the facts of the case, and Arpaio’s clear contempt for the rule of law, criminal prosecution is more than warranted.
C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Simple: red herring fallacy.
The thread is about Arpaio, not Clinton.
But your failed attempt to deflect by lying is understandable.
JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,541
- 2,165
- Banned
- #27
Arpaio and Sheridan will go to jail if they live long enough.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Who said I suppose Sheriff Joe? My tone...and calling him a liar...would seem to militate otherwise.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
What defense, skid mark?
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,689
- 263,974
- 3,615
QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Corruption, lying, defying court orders, he's going to get what he deserves. Now if only ALL politicians were held to that standard..
QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
Corruption, lying, defying court orders, he's going to get what he deserves. Now if only ALL politicians were held to that standard..
What he deserves is to be tied down daily in one of his tents. Smear some peanut butter on him.
saintmichaeldefendthem
Gold Member
Corruption, lying, defying court orders, he's going to get what he deserves. Now if only ALL politicians were held to that standard..
What he deserves is to be tied down daily in one of his tents. Smear some peanut butter on him.
Or we could just follow the law.
QuickHitCurepon
Diamond Member
Corruption, lying, defying court orders, he's going to get what he deserves. Now if only ALL politicians were held to that standard..
What he deserves is to be tied down daily in one of his tents. Smear some peanut butter on him.
Or we could just follow the law.
The penal code or institutional law?
New Topics
-
-
I found this nice vintage custom-made fixed blade hunting knife- Started by JGalt
- Replies: 3
-
Will Moscow´s empire attack NATO in Norway ? Putin's trump card in the Arctic?- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 0
-
