Judge Pirro

[skye]

So......FOX fired for awhile Judge Jeanine Pirro..... and hire Dirty Donna Brazile?

Will FOX hire Hillary Clinton next?

Curious minds want to know.

Poor sick sick sick FOX

 

[Frannie]

So......FOX fired for awhile Judge Jeanine Pirro..... and hire Dirty Donna Brazile?

Will FOX hire Hillary Clinton next?

Curious minds want to know.

Poor sick sick sick FOX

And Meghan Kelly attacked Trump viciously, and talked herself out of all employment

 

[Rigby5]

No one should be fired.
All opinions should be heard.
But Pirros opinion should be denounced as ignorant and irrational.

A hair covering is originally from the Old Testament, so also is worn by nuns, Amish, Pilgrims, and all conservative Christians, as well as Muslims and Jews.

These are modern Israeli Jewish women.

Muslims have pretty much identical beliefs, because they use the same Old Testament.

If all Muslims have the same beliefs they all need to be eliminated

In the United States we still use the death penalty.

Excellent

Three gold stars for you

You know how many first world countries still have the death penalty? The United States is one... they have that in company with countries like Iran, Iraq, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, Syria, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt...

Explain why you should pay for the care of mass murderers
Many of which do not even want to live

Because about 10% of those convicted and sentenced to die, are likely innocent.
Not only that, but there really is no way that the death penalty can exist in a democratic republic.
Individuals do have the right to kill, but only in defense, and executions are not in defense.
And if individuals do not have the right to execute, they can't delegate it to government.

 

[bripat9643]

So, not all Nazis are bad people. Is that what you're trying to tell us?

No, a better analogy would be that not all citizens of Germany during WWII were bad people.

No, that's not a better analogy, because not all the citizens of Germany during WWII subscribed to the same set of beliefs. However, all Nazis do, and all Muslims do.

Wrong, the Nazis in Germany represented a coalition of very diverse groups ranging from wealthy corporate owners, to nationalists and socialists. Many were just angry about how Germany was abused as the victim of terrorism in WWI.
And in fact, almost no one in Germany knew of the existence of death camps, just work camps.

And Muslims have never been associated with violence, aggression, invasion, or theft.
If Muslims had been associated with those things, then how come France and England were freely colonizing the Mideast?
Why would Theodor Hertl have been organizing Jewish colonies in Palestine?

Not just that, but many Germans were upset about how their economy was tanking after the Treaty of Versailles.

Especially since the French and British were confiscating all the German colonies, factories outside in of Germany, and some inside Germany, like the Ruhr, Alsace Lorraine, etc.
{...
The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the German Ruhr valley by France and Belgiumbetween 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. The occupation was a response to the German Weimar Republic widely and regularly defaulting on reparation payments in the early 1920s. The total reparation sum of £6.6 billion had been dictated by the victorious powers in the Treaty of Versailles, and the reparation payments were due to last several decades.
...}
Occupation of the Ruhr - Wikipedia

So you guys are OK with those poor Nazis now?

 

[bripat9643]

No, that's not a better analogy, because not all the citizens of Germany during WWII subscribed to the same set of beliefs. However, all Nazis do, and all Muslims do.

Wrong, the Nazis in Germany represented a coalition of very diverse groups ranging from wealthy corporate owners, to nationalists and socialists. Many were just angry about how Germany was abused as the victim of terrorism in WWI.
And in fact, almost no one in Germany knew of the existence of death camps, just work camps.

And Muslims have never been associated with violence, aggression, invasion, or theft.
If Muslims had been associated with those things, then how come France and England were freely colonizing the Mideast?
Why would Theodor Hertl have been organizing Jewish colonies in Palestine?

Not just that, but many Germans were upset about how their economy was tanking after the Treaty of Versailles.

Especially since the French and British were confiscating all the German colonies, factories outside in of Germany, and some inside Germany, like the Ruhr, Alsace Lorraine, etc.
{...
The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the German Ruhr valley by France and Belgiumbetween 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. The occupation was a response to the German Weimar Republic widely and regularly defaulting on reparation payments in the early 1920s. The total reparation sum of £6.6 billion had been dictated by the victorious powers in the Treaty of Versailles, and the reparation payments were due to last several decades.
...}
Occupation of the Ruhr - Wikipedia

Please stick to the topic.
And be nice.

This is sticking to one topic, which is that Christians are not nice, and do commit evil, often, and by whole countries.
WWI was a disgrace, where the Allies took the side of the terrorists who assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his wife.
Clearly the Allies in WWI were NOT the good guys.
Such duplicity, theft, defense of murder, and intentional starvation of the German people, was horrific, and disgusting.

How did WW I get into this discussion?

 

[bripat9643]

Get your fucking head out of the past and look around today

Afghan woman has nose cut off by husband

Why do you care if she got her nose cut off? She's an evil Muslim right? I guess you only care about Muslims if it helps support your warped view of the world.

You are a heartless pig...……………..

Enjoy the existence you call a life

You are the one that said all Muslims are evil.

Get your fucking head out of the past and look around today

Afghan woman has nose cut off by husband

Why do you care if she got her nose cut off? She's an evil Muslim right? I guess you only care about Muslims if it helps support your warped view of the world.

You are a heartless pig...……………..

Enjoy the existence you call a life

You are the one that said all Muslims are evil.

Anyone who defends this is evil, including you Muslim or not
Any Muslim who does not try to end this or leave is evil
Looking the other way is not an option for anyone who can care


Graphic image removed.

Muslims are not supposed to do anything evil according to the Quran.
And so far, no one has shown any evil done in the name of Islam.

"So far, no one has shown any evil done in the name of Islam."

 

[Frannie]

If all Muslims have the same beliefs they all need to be eliminated

In the United States we still use the death penalty.

Excellent

Three gold stars for you

You know how many first world countries still have the death penalty? The United States is one... they have that in company with countries like Iran, Iraq, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, Syria, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt...

Explain why you should pay for the care of mass murderers
Many of which do not even want to live

Because about 10% of those convicted and sentenced to die, are likely innocent.
Not only that, but there really is no way that the death penalty can exist in a democratic republic.
Individuals do have the right to kill, but only in defense, and executions are not in defense.
And if individuals do not have the right to execute, they can't delegate it to government.

Executions are not just about the executed, but about preventing future atrocities, which is the real point of law.

Piero has her right to her opinion, as you do as well. When you remove pirros right but maintain your own you are not advocating democracy

 

[Frannie]

Wrong, the Nazis in Germany represented a coalition of very diverse groups ranging from wealthy corporate owners, to nationalists and socialists. Many were just angry about how Germany was abused as the victim of terrorism in WWI.
And in fact, almost no one in Germany knew of the existence of death camps, just work camps.

And Muslims have never been associated with violence, aggression, invasion, or theft.
If Muslims had been associated with those things, then how come France and England were freely colonizing the Mideast?
Why would Theodor Hertl have been organizing Jewish colonies in Palestine?

Not just that, but many Germans were upset about how their economy was tanking after the Treaty of Versailles.

Especially since the French and British were confiscating all the German colonies, factories outside in of Germany, and some inside Germany, like the Ruhr, Alsace Lorraine, etc.
{...
The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the German Ruhr valley by France and Belgiumbetween 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. The occupation was a response to the German Weimar Republic widely and regularly defaulting on reparation payments in the early 1920s. The total reparation sum of £6.6 billion had been dictated by the victorious powers in the Treaty of Versailles, and the reparation payments were due to last several decades.
...}
Occupation of the Ruhr - Wikipedia

Please stick to the topic.
And be nice.

This is sticking to one topic, which is that Christians are not nice, and do commit evil, often, and by whole countries.
WWI was a disgrace, where the Allies took the side of the terrorists who assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his wife.
Clearly the Allies in WWI were NOT the good guys.
Such duplicity, theft, defense of murder, and intentional starvation of the German people, was horrific, and disgusting.

How did WW I get into this discussion?

When he was a kid a Christian stole his lunch and now he has a vendetta on all Christian lunch thieves.

 

[rightwinger]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

 

[Frannie]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

I am not outraged over the hijab, I am outraged that pirro while entirely correct was censored by the now liberal fox news

PS. This is what the hijab hides

Warning graphic image of mutilated Islamic woman

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zhxuCDjTd9U/hqdefault.jpg

 

[rightwinger]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

I am not outraged over the hijab, I am outraged that pirro while entirely correct was censored by the now liberal fox news

PS. This is what the hijab hides

Warning graphic image of mutilated Islamic woman

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zhxuCDjTd9U/hqdefault.jpg

Pirro threw red meat to the bigots and racists in her rant questioning whether a Muslim could be a real American

I have not seen any mutilated Muslims in America........have you?

 

[Frannie]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

I am not outraged over the hijab, I am outraged that pirro while entirely correct was censored by the now liberal fox news

PS. This is what the hijab hides

Warning graphic image of mutilated Islamic woman

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zhxuCDjTd9U/hqdefault.jpg

Pirro threw red meat to the bigots and racists in her rant questioning whether a Muslim could be a real American

I have not seen any mutilated Muslims in America........have you?

American muslims worship EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT AS ISIS.

My text says love your neighbor and enemy the Koran says convert them or destroy them by jihad, jumbo jet attack is acceptable

Pirro said nothing not accurate

 

[rightwinger]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

I am not outraged over the hijab, I am outraged that pirro while entirely correct was censored by the now liberal fox news

PS. This is what the hijab hides

Warning graphic image of mutilated Islamic woman

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zhxuCDjTd9U/hqdefault.jpg

Pirro threw red meat to the bigots and racists in her rant questioning whether a Muslim could be a real American

I have not seen any mutilated Muslims in America........have you?

American muslims worship EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT AS ISIS.

My text says love your neighbor and enemy the Koran says convert them or destroy them by jihad, jumbo jet attack is acceptable

Pirro said nothing not accurate

1.5 billion Muslims on earth and 2 million American Muslims living peacefully. Only the radical fringe engage in such atrocities

As Americans, we are more threatened by radical right wing terrorists than our Muslim Population

 

[Rigby5]

No, a better analogy would be that not all citizens of Germany during WWII were bad people.

No, that's not a better analogy, because not all the citizens of Germany during WWII subscribed to the same set of beliefs. However, all Nazis do, and all Muslims do.

Wrong, the Nazis in Germany represented a coalition of very diverse groups ranging from wealthy corporate owners, to nationalists and socialists. Many were just angry about how Germany was abused as the victim of terrorism in WWI.
And in fact, almost no one in Germany knew of the existence of death camps, just work camps.

And Muslims have never been associated with violence, aggression, invasion, or theft.
If Muslims had been associated with those things, then how come France and England were freely colonizing the Mideast?
Why would Theodor Hertl have been organizing Jewish colonies in Palestine?

Not just that, but many Germans were upset about how their economy was tanking after the Treaty of Versailles.

Especially since the French and British were confiscating all the German colonies, factories outside in of Germany, and some inside Germany, like the Ruhr, Alsace Lorraine, etc.
{...
The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the German Ruhr valley by France and Belgiumbetween 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. The occupation was a response to the German Weimar Republic widely and regularly defaulting on reparation payments in the early 1920s. The total reparation sum of £6.6 billion had been dictated by the victorious powers in the Treaty of Versailles, and the reparation payments were due to last several decades.
...}
Occupation of the Ruhr - Wikipedia

So you guys are OK with those poor Nazis now?

Nonsense.
The point is that when you starve people, you are going to get a violent reaction.
The Germans did not cause WWII, the Allies did with the unfair Treaty of Versailles.
Similarly, the Mideast Arabs did not cause the 9/11 attack, the US did by dozens of evil things, such as supporting abuse of the Palestinians, the murder on the Highway of Death, etc.
Put blame where is belongs, and not on the victims.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong, the Nazis in Germany represented a coalition of very diverse groups ranging from wealthy corporate owners, to nationalists and socialists. Many were just angry about how Germany was abused as the victim of terrorism in WWI.
And in fact, almost no one in Germany knew of the existence of death camps, just work camps.

And Muslims have never been associated with violence, aggression, invasion, or theft.
If Muslims had been associated with those things, then how come France and England were freely colonizing the Mideast?
Why would Theodor Hertl have been organizing Jewish colonies in Palestine?

Not just that, but many Germans were upset about how their economy was tanking after the Treaty of Versailles.

Especially since the French and British were confiscating all the German colonies, factories outside in of Germany, and some inside Germany, like the Ruhr, Alsace Lorraine, etc.
{...
The Occupation of the Ruhr (German: Ruhrbesetzung) was a period of military occupation of the German Ruhr valley by France and Belgiumbetween 11 January 1923 and 25 August 1925. The occupation was a response to the German Weimar Republic widely and regularly defaulting on reparation payments in the early 1920s. The total reparation sum of £6.6 billion had been dictated by the victorious powers in the Treaty of Versailles, and the reparation payments were due to last several decades.
...}
Occupation of the Ruhr - Wikipedia

Please stick to the topic.
And be nice.

This is sticking to one topic, which is that Christians are not nice, and do commit evil, often, and by whole countries.
WWI was a disgrace, where the Allies took the side of the terrorists who assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his wife.
Clearly the Allies in WWI were NOT the good guys.
Such duplicity, theft, defense of murder, and intentional starvation of the German people, was horrific, and disgusting.

How did WW I get into this discussion?

WWI got into the discussion as an example of Christians having a history of being the bad guys.
We could also go back to the Spanish American War, or up to Vietnam if you prefer.

 

[candycorn]

No one should be fired.
All opinions should be heard.
But Pirros opinion should be denounced as ignorant and irrational.

A hair covering is originally from the Old Testament, so also is worn by nuns, Amish, Pilgrims, and all conservative Christians, as well as Muslims and Jews.

These are modern Israeli Jewish women.

Muslims have pretty much identical beliefs, because they use the same Old Testament.

If all Muslims have the same beliefs they all need to be eliminated.


Do NOT post graphic images. Removed. Frannie

Boy you read really badly.
I did not say that all Muslims have the same beliefs as each other, but that Muslims have the same beliefs as Jews, since things like women covering their hair comes from the exact same Old Testament writings.

LOL you think I read your nonsense?

If Judge Pirro denounces the hate speech that Omar used against Jews that is her right

Rep. Ilhan Omar responds to House committee chair's charge of 'vile, anti-Semitic slur'

No its not Pirro's right to lie and incite harm against innocents.
Omar criticized Israel, which all Jews are supposed to do.
If you knew anything about Judaism, you would know that after the fall of the 2nd Temple of Solomon in 160 AD, Jewish leadership decreed that no Jews should return to Jerusalem until the coming of the Messiah, as a sign that Jews has atoned for the sins of arrogance and pride.
All the rest of the world criticizes Israel for its constant violations of the Geneva Conventions, and war crimes.
Anyone NOT criticizing Israel is then complicit with the war crimes Israel is committing.

Pirro did not lie, she expressed her opinion, when opinions are censored Hitler wins

No exceptions

Hitler wins? Oh brother.

 

[Frannie]

Why are Conservatives so outraged over a hijab?

I am not outraged over the hijab, I am outraged that pirro while entirely correct was censored by the now liberal fox news

PS. This is what the hijab hides

Warning graphic image of mutilated Islamic woman

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zhxuCDjTd9U/hqdefault.jpg

Pirro threw red meat to the bigots and racists in her rant questioning whether a Muslim could be a real American

I have not seen any mutilated Muslims in America........have you?

American muslims worship EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT AS ISIS.

My text says love your neighbor and enemy the Koran says convert them or destroy them by jihad, jumbo jet attack is acceptable

Pirro said nothing not accurate

1.5 billion Muslims on earth and 2 million American Muslims living peacefully. Only the radical fringe engage in such atrocities

As Americans, we are more threatened by radical right wing terrorists than our Muslim Population

Either one denounces hate text, or they support it.
Pirro has denounced the Koran and I stand with her anywhere anytime.

As for the liberal fox news, f them

 

[Rigby5]

In the United States we still use the death penalty.

Excellent

Three gold stars for you

You know how many first world countries still have the death penalty? The United States is one... they have that in company with countries like Iran, Iraq, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, Syria, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt...

Explain why you should pay for the care of mass murderers
Many of which do not even want to live

Because about 10% of those convicted and sentenced to die, are likely innocent.
Not only that, but there really is no way that the death penalty can exist in a democratic republic.
Individuals do have the right to kill, but only in defense, and executions are not in defense.
And if individuals do not have the right to execute, they can't delegate it to government.

Executions are not just about the executed, but about preventing future atrocities, which is the real point of law.

Piero has her right to her opinion, as you do as well. When you remove pirros right but maintain your own you are not advocating democracy

Executions have never prevented anything.
Charles Dickens wrote about how the pickpockets loved it when they hung a pickpocket because it was such easy pickings.

Pierro has a right to her opinions, but once she deliberately lies in a way that is likely to cause others to commit murder, she has committed the crimes of inciting illegal violence.

I have a right to my opinion, but that is ignored because I can't afford access to the media.
That is not a democracy Pierro is advocating. It is the worst of hysterical mob rule.

 

[Frannie]

If all Muslims have the same beliefs they all need to be eliminated.


Do NOT post graphic images. Removed. Frannie

Boy you read really badly.
I did not say that all Muslims have the same beliefs as each other, but that Muslims have the same beliefs as Jews, since things like women covering their hair comes from the exact same Old Testament writings.

LOL you think I read your nonsense?

If Judge Pirro denounces the hate speech that Omar used against Jews that is her right

Rep. Ilhan Omar responds to House committee chair's charge of 'vile, anti-Semitic slur'

No its not Pirro's right to lie and incite harm against innocents.
Omar criticized Israel, which all Jews are supposed to do.
If you knew anything about Judaism, you would know that after the fall of the 2nd Temple of Solomon in 160 AD, Jewish leadership decreed that no Jews should return to Jerusalem until the coming of the Messiah, as a sign that Jews has atoned for the sins of arrogance and pride.
All the rest of the world criticizes Israel for its constant violations of the Geneva Conventions, and war crimes.
Anyone NOT criticizing Israel is then complicit with the war crimes Israel is committing.

Pirro did not lie, she expressed her opinion, when opinions are censored Hitler wins

No exceptions

Hitler wins? Oh brother.

Hitler killed jews and Christian's both

Do you disagree?

 

[Frannie]

Excellent

Three gold stars for you

You know how many first world countries still have the death penalty? The United States is one... they have that in company with countries like Iran, Iraq, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, Syria, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan, Egypt...

Explain why you should pay for the care of mass murderers
Many of which do not even want to live

Because about 10% of those convicted and sentenced to die, are likely innocent.
Not only that, but there really is no way that the death penalty can exist in a democratic republic.
Individuals do have the right to kill, but only in defense, and executions are not in defense.
And if individuals do not have the right to execute, they can't delegate it to government.

Executions are not just about the executed, but about preventing future atrocities, which is the real point of law.

Piero has her right to her opinion, as you do as well. When you remove pirros right but maintain your own you are not advocating democracy

Executions have never prevented anything.
Charles Dickens wrote about how the pickpockets loved it when they hung a pickpocket because it was such easy pickings.

Pierro has a right to her opinions, but once she deliberately lies in a way that is likely to cause others to commit murder, she has committed the crimes of inciting illegal violence.

I have a right to my opinion, but that is ignored because I can't afford access to the media.
That is not a democracy Pierro is advocating. It is the worst of hysterical mob rule.

Pirro never lied, you are senile and delusional or both

Lol who did pirro direct to commit murder? Under the Koran all practicing muslims must murder her, is this what u mean