Judge Orders Biden To Reimplement Key Trump Border Policy As Biden’s Border Catastrophe Worsens

harmonica said:
......he is totally fking up the US with this and other crap = he's a total idiot --plain and simple
Click to expand...
99AAE6E7-0A9B-4A5B-BFB1-DA6D90FF470E.webp
 
The courts need to start acting fast on all these lawsuits calling Biden out for violating his Oath Of Office.



Trump’s Stay-in-Mexico Immigration Policy Revived by Judge​

Robert Burnson, Bloomberg News

A Central American migrant is apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol agents after crossing the Rio Grande in Roma, Texas, U.S., on Saturday, June 12, 2021. Legislation that would grant a path to citizenship to young immigrants brought to the U.S as children has triggered a fresh round of partisan skirmishes over border security, as the fate of a program shielding them from deportation hangs in the balance. Photographer: Nicolo Filippo Rosso/Bloomberg

A Central American migrant is apprehended by U.S. Border Patrol agents after crossing the Rio Grande in Roma, Texas, U.S., on Saturday, June 12, 2021. Legislation that would grant a path to citizenship to young immigrants brought to the U.S as children has triggered a fresh round of partisan skirmishes over border security, as the fate of a program shielding them from deportation hangs in the balance. Photographer: Nicolo Filippo Rosso/Bloomberg , Bloomberg
(Bloomberg) -- A federal judge ordered the Biden administration to revive a controversial policy begun under former President Donald Trump that forces immigrants seeking U.S. asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their applications are pending.
U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, ruled Friday that the Biden administration “failed to consider several critical factors, including the benefits of the remain in Mexico policy,” before ending the program.
It’s another setback for President Joe Biden following a January ruling by a different judge in Texas that temporarily blocked the new administration’s plan to pause deportations of undocumented immigrants for 100 days.
Friday’s decision came in a lawsuit filed by the Republican-led states of Texas and Missouri, which claimed the suspension of the program was worsening conditions at the border and allowing criminals to slip into the country.
Biden suspended the so-called Remain in Mexico program the day after he office on Jan. 20.,

www.bnnbloomberg.ca

BNN Bloomberg - Canada Business News, TSX Today, Oil and Energy Prices

Get the latest Canadian business news, including TSX updates, changes to oil and energy prices, and Bank of Canada coverage. Explore stock market investing and get expert financial insights on investment portfolio strategies.
www.bnnbloomberg.ca www.bnnbloomberg.ca
 
First we need to stop using the migrant. They are illegals. They get citizenship or anything. They crossed into the country illegally and are not citizens.

But the president is supposed to be in place for the good of the country as a whole, and for the American citizens as a whole, and nothing else. We are not responsible for people from other countries, each country is responsible for their own people.

If people want to come here then they need to be one citizens, speak decent English, pay taxes, have jobs and a purpose. Not just walk in and expect to be taken care of.

America simply needs to be a place for Americans, natural born or foriegners who become citizens. Either way America is for Americans.
 
The dark side of "stay in Mexico": huge numbers of migrants assaulted, raped, murdered, kidnapped and trafficked. That border area is amongst the most lawless in Mexico. No wonder Trumpsters supported it.
 
kyzr said:
Maybe Abbott/FBI/US Marshals could arrest Mayorkas for ignoring a court order?
Click to expand...

It boils down to what Dementia does. When we get back the House in 2022, we already have an impeachable offense of him violating his oath of office by not obeying the Supreme Court with the eviction thing. This one might make a good case for the second impeachment.
 
iceberg said:
then don't put yourself in that position by trying to illegally get in a country.
Click to expand...
That is, I am sure, one way of looking at it and supporting a policy that is both inhumane and based on a sense of retribution. People who are seeking asylum are seeking asylum because they are fleeing a situation that is violent and inhumane. Willfully putting them into the same situation is pretty wrong imo. (disclaimer - that is not to say all meet the criteria for asylum, but until they have a hearing to determine it, they deserve to be treated as asylum seekers not criminals.)
 
15th post
Weatherman2020 said:
Trump had it right, Part 34,528
Click to expand...
Trump's followers can't help themselves. They and their far right sources lie in vain attempts to prove a point.

Many Daily Wire stories repackage journalism from traditional news organizations while adding a conservative slant.[3][6] Fact checkers have said that some stories shared by The Daily Wire are unverified, and that The Daily Wire often misstates facts to advance a partisan view.

The Daily Wire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

In the future don't trust anything they say until it appears in responsible news sources.
 
Sandy Shanks said:
Trump's followers can't help themselves. They and their far right sources lie in vain attempts to prove a point.

Many Daily Wire stories repackage journalism from traditional news organizations while adding a conservative slant.[3][6] Fact checkers have said that some stories shared by The Daily Wire are unverified, and that The Daily Wire often misstates facts to advance a partisan view.

The Daily Wire - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

In the future don't trust anything they say until it appears in responsible news sources.
Click to expand...
Hilarious. ‘Fact’ checkers. And then you put the icing on the cake with a link to wiki.
Federal judge gave the order, shitforbrains.
Give me a few minutes to go change that wiki post. You can glue yourself to CNN while you wait.
 
Coyote said:
That is, I am sure, one way of looking at it and supporting a policy that is both inhumane and based on a sense of retribution. People who are seeking asylum are seeking asylum because they are fleeing a situation that is violent and inhumane. Willfully putting them into the same situation is pretty wrong imo. (disclaimer - that is not to say all meet the criteria for asylum, but until they have a hearing to determine it, they deserve to be treated as asylum seekers not criminals.)
Click to expand...
they are not seeking asylum. that has a strict definition and wanting a better life isn't a part of it

it is immigration under another name when you call it asylum.
 
and since, as you say this is a dangerous area, donr you think we'd patrol it more and be more careful about who comes in and out?

Leaving a wide open southern border where, as you say, is very violent, seeks inhumane to people on the other side.

Citizens or not.

Why is that OK? How come the become safe when this "line" isn't secure? What keeps the bad guys from just coming over and continuing?

Painting people as inhumane because they don't agree with you just seems a short cut through assumption to avoid discussion.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

In desperation, U.S. scours for countries willing to house Afghan refugees

< Previous Thread

Shall We Stop The Bigotry of Omar?

Next Thread >

Similar threads

protectionist
The Bidens are in big trouble
2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
785
protectionist
protectionist
excalibur
Judge finds Minnesota has fraud problem, refuses to order Trump to restart Medicaid money
Replies
15
Views
216
Rawley
Rawley
IM2
All Trump has ever done is create huge problems where none existed, then blame others for the mess that he made. Now he is killing American citizens
6 7 8
Replies
144
Views
1K
Stann
S
B
US intel hid Chinese 2020 election meddling from Trump because they opposed his policies, memo says
Replies
2
Views
102
Muhammed
Muhammed
berg80
You too can set the policy of your government. And other concerns on a day ending in 'Y.'
2
Replies
23
Views
296
berg80
berg80

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom