Words are evidence you Dipshit. Have you ever watched a cop show? Law and Order? Heard the
Miranda warning read out loud?
Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. That isn't something that begins when police have you in custody, it's just them having to remind you before you say something incriminating in front of them. It doesn't really matter who you say it to though it's evidence all the same.
You heard it. He said he grabs women by the pussy without even asking. That's called assault and sexual abuse and battery.
Consent comes before your grab women by the pussy not afterwards. He can't testify to how women feel about him grabbing them by the pussy without him asking. That's what's hearsay.
So because he didn't assault that woman means he didn't assault others?
Why would any decent human being stretch the truth to appear as a sexual assaulter?
Him lying to the jury didn't help his credibility there.
How many of them have audio of their assaulter admitting he assaults?
I just described the evidence.
Find any quote of me saying I wish to deny Tara Reade anything or just stop make believing as an argument.
Words are evidence you Dipshit. Have you ever watched a cop show? Law and Order? Heard the Miranda warning read out loud? Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law
first...this isn't "tv law" hell, TV law isn't actually law. Second, Miranda rights don't apply here because trump wasn't arrested.
Also, his words were spoken like 20 years ago. It was just locker room banter, and no admission that he actually DID anything
You heard it. He said he grabs women by the pussy without even asking. That's called assault and sexual abuse and battery.
Lol, just because he said that doesn't mean he's actually guilty of any sexual assault. The accuser still has to PROVE they were assaulted. That's why the case was so flimsy and just BS. She was able to get a low bar burden of proof where the jury didn't have to actually find that he actually did anything, only that it's possible he could have.
you know, if someone walks into a police station and confesses to a crime, they don't say "welp, case is over, we got our guy" no, they STILL have to investigate it and have a trial because they still have to prove he did it.
Again, by the standard this case was done, every woman on earth could accuse trump of serial assault and win the case.
Consent comes before your grab women by the pussy not afterwards. He can't testify to how women feel about him grabbing them by the pussy without him asking. That's what's hearsay.
some women that hang in those circles will throw themselves at people with money and power. It does happen.
So because he didn't assault that woman means he didn't assault others?
That borders on strawman. What it does is call into question that maybe trump doesn't force himself on women. If he was, then when he said he made a move on that woman and failed would mean that maybe he's not this sexual predator
Why would any decent human being stretch the truth to appear as a sexual assaulter?
Because in the context of the conversation, he wasn't talking about being a sexual predator, he was talking about how women throw themselves at him.
Again, a couple of dudes sitting around telling tall tales about scoring women. Why is it so hard to believe that?
Him lying to the jury didn't help his credibility there.
What lie would that be?
How many of them have audio of their assaulter admitting he assaults?
This case didn't have any audio that he assaults women. All this case has is trump being a braggart. Him saying he grabs women by the pussy is not proof that he actually did it, it's just him engaging in boys locker room talk. Nothing more.
I just described the evidence.
You just described her version of events, of which she has zero proof that he actually touched her. His testimony was just as valid as hers. She says he did, he says he didn't, so she needs more proof. Again, preponderence of evidence is an extremely weak burden of proof.
I certainly hope this works it's way up the appeals process and if necessary, to scotus. Because the whole trial was a sham.
Find any quote of me saying I wish to deny Tara Reade anything or just stop make believing as an argument.
I said "you all" as in, democrats as a whole.
