Judge directs Trump administration to comply with order to unfreeze federal grants

[Mac-7]

Judges need to stay in their own lane.

I think a showdown is coming

 

[Blaster]

I think a showdown is coming

Trump will win.

 

[BackAgain]

Rule by unelected black robes is not what the Founders intended

I’m all for properly limited judicial rulings where the judge has genuine jurisdiction over the matter(s) in a complaint.

I am not at all for judicial rulings which are not based on proper grants of jurisdiction.

And so forth. Like, has the judge invalidly assumed judicial authority over matters which aren’t the province of the judicial branch? Also, is the judge’s “order” narrow enough even if the court has some actual jurisdiction?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Meh just ignore the judge like Biden did SCOTUS

You had to know it was going to bite you

What SCOTUS decision did Biden ignore?
.
.
P.S. - It wasn't student loans. The case was made that certain laws authorized his actions. The SCOTUS reviewed teh laws, reviewed the arguments, and issued a ruling. The Biden Administration STOPPED student load debt relief under those laws. The SCOTUS didn't say that other forms of student loan relief were not possible, only the ones used to argue for their actions.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Trump needs to publicize all the judges that suck off of Soros teat, and remove them as traitors...

With a passing knowlege of the Constitution, one knows that the President (Trump) doesn't have the power to remove Federal Judges.

Oh, and BTW, all the cases are public record. The names of the Judges are well known.

WW

 

[22lcidw]

What SCOTUS decision did Biden ignore?
.
.
P.S. - It wasn't student loans. The case was made that certain laws authorized his actions. The SCOTUS reviewed teh laws, reviewed the arguments, and issued a ruling. The Biden Administration STOPPED student load debt relief under those laws. The SCOTUS didn't say that other forms of student loan relief were not possible, only the ones used to argue for their actions.

WW

Frankly, these lower-level Progressive Socialist Communist judges show up like purposely installed vermin to counter anything that denotes true freedom. Citizens in our nation fell asleep as Democrats slowly filled up near everything, we do with globalist cretins. When Trump says America First that is against the Progs agendas with a percentage of Republicans.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Suppose trump refuses to comply?

That becomes an interesting question doesn't it.

 

[Zincwarrior]

They can reduce spending if they want. It’s just never practiced, until now.

A future President can reduce to spend allocated funds on the military or border security then?
Can a future president refuse to send money to a particular state - Texas for example?

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Rule of Law is the rule of lawyers. It is nothing but a bossy buzz-phrase used by pompous blowhards to intimidate the people from asserting their will.

/—-/

 

[Zincwarrior]

/—-/
View attachment 1077081

Wiener dog!

 

[Mac-7]

Trump will win.

I think he has more support than the unelected judges

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

 

[Mac-7]

I’m all for properly limited judicial rulings where the judge has genuine jurisdiction over the matter(s) in a complaint.

I am not at all for judicial rulings which are not based on proper grants of jurisdiction.

And so forth. Like, has the judge invalidly assumed judicial authority over matters which aren’t the province of the judicial branch? Also, is the judge’s “order” narrow enough even if the court has some actual jurisdiction?

My gut tells me the judges are playing politics

 

[Zincwarrior]

My gut tells me the judges are playing politics

Or they are simply following the laws and Constitution of the US.

For example, stare decisis holds that that the 14th Amendment DOES mean birth citizenship, until the Constitution changes or a higher court (SCOTUS) rules that way.

 

[excalibur]

Obama appointee in a Blue State. Yeah, ugh.

 

[excalibur]

Criminal contempt? Get that pardon pen ready, President Trump. Checkmate, judgey.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Criminal contempt? Get that pardon pen ready, President Trump. Checkmate, judgey.

Legally he could hold Trump in contempt. . .

 

[Mac-7]

Or they are simply following the laws and Constitution of the US.

For example, stare decisis holds that that the 14th Amendment DOES mean birth citizenship, until the Constitution changes or a higher court (SCOTUS) rules that way.

Yes, that issue does require judicial review

But others such as withholding funding for sanctuary cities should not be left up to some lower court judge

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Legally he could hold Trump in contempt. . .

Shit rolls downhill Elon...

 

[Mac-7]

Then take a fucking laxative you anal douche bag.

Fuck off asshole