Judge Chutkan Has Trump’s Jan. 6 Case Back And Is Ready To Roll

Trump Legal Blow: Judge Chucks Out Bid to Dismiss 2020 Election Meddling Case --

‘There’s No Meaningful Evidence’​


Judge Chutkan said Trump’s legal team had provided “no meaningful evidence” the former president had been prosecuted for “vindictive and political purposes”.​


The judge rejected both arguments, with Chutkan writing in her ruling that Trump was not charged merely for challenging the results but because he “knowingly made false statements in furtherance of criminal conspiracies and for obstruction of election certification proceedings”.

You guys.
 
Why would the state of Miissouri have a say in the verdict of the state of New York against a private citizen doing business in New York that is NOT a citizen of Missouri?

Seems like a helluva stretch....and I ain't a judge. Or hell, even a lawyer.

Or an adult
 
You guys.
You guys?

How about American, US citizens, voters?

Democracy in America

Arizona grand jurors discussed indicting Trump, but prosecutors urged them not to​

The grand jury ultimately indicted 18 Trump allies, including Mark Meadows and Rudy Giuliani, over efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

The court document offers a rare glimpse into Arizona grand jury proceedings, which are typically kept secret. The grand jury ultimately indicted Trump advisers such as former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and attorneys Rudy Giuliani, Jenna Ellis, John Eastman and Christina Bobb. Also charged were the 11 Arizona Republicans who signed paperwork on Dec. 14, 2020, that falsely described Trump as the rightful winner.

One of those 11 Republicans — activist Loraine Pellegrino, who served as “secretary” of the elector effort — had most of the charges against her dismissed on Tuesday. She pleaded guilty to a lesser misdemeanor charge that involved the recording of a false document, according to the court docket.

 
Back
Top Bottom