Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,530
- 82,272
- 3,615
Does it mention the President?Are you suggesting that the first amendment doesn’t limit the power of the president?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does it mention the President?Are you suggesting that the first amendment doesn’t limit the power of the president?
It doesn’t, but it definitely limits the presidents ability to use government to suppress speech.Does it mention the President?
He's in total compliance.Posse comitatus is still a law and Trump seeks to violate it.

How does it limit it, and give examples of Trump suppressing speech.It doesn’t, but it definitely limits the presidents ability to use government to suppress speech.
Don’t you agree?
Nope. It does not give him the authority to nationalize guard troops whenever he wants.He's in total compliance.
11, because right around 2027 the left will stop the Trump Hate to start the Vance Hate, and then they will have to put up with Vance for 8 years. But right around 2025 they will stop the Vance Hate to start up the Gabbard Hate. The left have to have an Emmanuel Goldstein to hate ad nauseam.
I see you’re unable to answer a simple question, troll.How does it limit it, and give examples of Trump suppressing speech.
‘This will be a hoot.
You need to read up on that.Nope. It does not give him the authority to nationalize guard troops whenever he wants.
Wait I thought it was a socialist paradise. Pick a team!Portland is a fascist paradise
From the article:You need to read up on that.
Explain how posse comitatus is being violated.Nope. It does not give him the authority to nationalize guard troops whenever he wants.
She's going to be found wrong.From the article:
Immergut ruled Saturday that Trump's federalization order exceeded his authority because the law only allows the president to call in the National Guard under exceptional circumstances, including invasion, rebellion or an inability to execute federal law using regular forces.
The court found none of those conditions existed in Oregon, determining that local and federal law enforcement were capable of maintaining order.
Further, because Immergut ruled Trump acted outside statutory limits, she found the order also violated the 10th Amendment by infringing on Oregon’s sovereign right to control its own National Guard.
It explains how he’s in violation of posse comitatus.She's going to be found wrong.
I think the neo-leftists actually want Trump to be able to run again just so they can hate Trump for another 8 years. Hating Trump is so much of the neo-left's identity now, maybe they won't be able to move on to another Emmanuel Goldstein ever again.Vance isnt going to be the candidate.
Socialism always leads to fascism.Wait I thought it was a socialist paradise. Pick a team!
Is why dems always go around it.The Constititution is so annoying.
No chance of rebellion to the authority of the US government?It explains how he’s in violation of posse comitatus.
The exceptional circumstances necessary don’t exist here.
Link?Vance isnt going to be the candidate.
So no examples.I see you’re unable to answer a simple question, troll.
