saveliberty
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2009
- 58,760
- 10,853
- 2,030
I don't want to hear a SINGLE lefty bring up someone's free speech rights for the next year, unless they start defending Juan now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NPR is not in any way shape, form, or fashion "a radical left wing radio station." You, however, sound like a far right wing kook on a bent. Go for it.
I don't want to hear a SINGLE lefty bring up someone's free speech rights for the next year, unless they start defending Juan now.
NPR is not in any way shape, form, or fashion "a radical left wing radio station." You, however, sound like a far right wing kook on a bent. Go for it.
Their actions canning Juan Williams confirms it.
I don't want to hear a SINGLE lefty bring up someone's free speech rights for the next year, unless they start defending Juan now.
He is still free to say whatever he likes.
except NOT ONE of the 19 Muslims (jihad) that brought the world trade center and Pentagon down, were WEARING Muslim garb...
i feel sorry for him too...
I don't want to hear a SINGLE lefty bring up someone's free speech rights for the next year, unless they start defending Juan now.
He is still free to say whatever he likes.
I don't want to hear a SINGLE lefty bring up someone's free speech rights for the next year, unless they start defending Juan now.
He is still free to say whatever he likes.
A defense would be:
1. He should get his job back.
2. He was wrongly discharged.
3. NPR needs to be punished in some fashion.
4. Who ever made the call to fire him should not be associated with NPR.
NPR is not in any way shape, form, or fashion "a radical left wing radio station." You, however, sound like a far right wing kook on a bent. Go for it.
Their actions canning Juan Williams confirms it.
Not at all. It means that someone, Vivian Schiller, made a stupid ass mistake. I bet she is canned by the end of the week. And on that scintillating note, I am off to watch some "Glee".
He is still free to say whatever he likes.
A defense would be:
1. He should get his job back.
2. He was wrongly discharged.
3. NPR needs to be punished in some fashion.
4. Who ever made the call to fire him should not be associated with NPR.
They had a standard of employment which he violated. He had a track record of injecting his personal bias where it was uncalled for according to that standard.
Given the context, I could see NPR forgiving those comments but that is up to their discretion.
He is still free to say whatever he likes.
A defense would be:
1. He should get his job back.
2. He was wrongly discharged.
3. NPR needs to be punished in some fashion.
4. Who ever made the call to fire him should not be associated with NPR.
They had a standard of employment which he violated. He had a track record of injecting his personal bias where it was uncalled for according to that standard.
/QUOTE]
Wrong be was fired because the personal Bias he showed was not far left enough.
NPR does not fire it's other people who regularly inject their Personal Far left bias.
He was fired for being to moderate of a liberal.
Their actions canning Juan Williams confirms it.
Not at all. It means that someone, Vivian Schiller, made a stupid ass mistake. I bet she is canned by the end of the week. And on that scintillating note, I am off to watch some "Glee".
I also Bet NPR loses it's Federal funding as well.
NPR is not in any way shape, form, or fashion "a radical left wing radio station." You, however, sound like a far right wing kook on a bent. Go for it.
A defense would be:
1. He should get his job back.
2. He was wrongly discharged.
3. NPR needs to be punished in some fashion.
4. Who ever made the call to fire him should not be associated with NPR.
They had a standard of employment which he violated. He had a track record of injecting his personal bias where it was uncalled for according to that standard.
Wrong be was fired because the personal Bias he showed was not far left enough.
NPR does not fire it's other people who regularly inject their Personal Far left bias.
He was fired for being to moderate of a liberal.
They had a standard of employment which he violated. He had a track record of injecting his personal bias where it was uncalled for according to that standard.
Wrong be was fired because the personal Bias he showed was not far left enough.
NPR does not fire it's other people who regularly inject their Personal Far left bias.
He was fired for being to moderate of a liberal.
NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller sent an internal memo Thursday seeking to clarify why Williams' contract was terminated, claiming that the remarks he made on Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" weren't the problem, he was canned because he's become a pundit rather than an analyst.
NPR is not in any way shape, form, or fashion "a radical left wing radio station." You, however, sound like a far right wing kook on a bent. Go for it.
Their actions canning Juan Williams confirms it.
Not at all. It means that someone, Vivian Schiller, made a stupid ass mistake. I bet she is canned by the end of the week. And on that scintillating note, I am off to watch some "Glee".
Their actions canning Juan Williams confirms it.
Not at all. It means that someone, Vivian Schiller, made a stupid ass mistake. I bet she is canned by the end of the week. And on that scintillating note, I am off to watch some "Glee".
NPR supplies a couple of the libs Fox uses to counter-balance the discussions. I hear they want to can Moral Ireson just for general purposes.
Doesn't anyone think this coddling of Muslims is getting out of hand?
What has been a constant threat to Americans at home and abroad has now become a protected class like Blacks and Hispanics.
Wrong be was fired because the personal Bias he showed was not far left enough.
NPR does not fire it's other people who regularly inject their Personal Far left bias.
He was fired for being to moderate of a liberal.
NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller sent an internal memo Thursday seeking to clarify why Williams' contract was terminated, claiming that the remarks he made on Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" weren't the problem, he was canned because he's become a pundit rather than an analyst.
It's her word against his now isn't it? Unless of course she's carefully documented these problems with Juan. His performance evaluations should reflect these "previous incidents" true?
NPR President and CEO Vivian Schiller sent an internal memo Thursday seeking to clarify why Williams' contract was terminated, claiming that the remarks he made on Fox News' "The O'Reilly Factor" weren't the problem, he was canned because he's become a pundit rather than an analyst.
It's her word against his now isn't it? Unless of course she's carefully documented these problems with Juan. His performance evaluations should reflect these "previous incidents" true?
Yes, I would think so, but I'm not privy to the contract or the incidents.......you?