John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal To Supreme Court Was 'Frivolous'

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
88,883
Reaction score
12,042
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
By Luke Johnson

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens writes in his new memoir, Five Chiefs, that the George W. Bush campaign's 2000 appeal to the United States Supreme Court over the Florida recount was "frivolous" and never should have been granted.

He recalls bumping into Justice Stephen Breyer at a Christmas party and the two having a brief conversation about the Bush application to halt the recount by issuing a stay. "We agreed that the application was frivolous," he writes. "To secure a stay, a litigant must show that one is necessary to prevent a legally cognizable irreparable injury. Bush's attorneys had failed to make any such showing."

By a five-to-four vote, the court granted the stay. "What I still regard as a frivolous stay application kept the court extremely busy for four days," he writes. He adds that no justice has ever cited the opinions that provided the basis for their ruling.

Indeed, the court -- unusually -- limited its decision "to the present circumstances," meaning that it did not want it to become a precedent.
More: John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal To Supreme Court Was 'Frivolous'
 
OP
Lakhota

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
88,883
Reaction score
12,042
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
No surprise to me! Al Gore was cheated and robbed.
 

Amelia

Rookie
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
21,830
Reaction score
5,442
Points
0
Location
Packerland!
Florida was a nightmare because the media reported the state's result as decided before the Republican-heavy panhandle was done voting. Lots of people on military bases were waiting to get off of work to go out and vote.

If the state had been given to Gore after that attempt to suppress Republican voting, it would have been an injustice.
 

Rocko

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
17,516
Reaction score
4,510
Points
280
Location
NY
The American people were saved from ozone man.
 
OP
Lakhota

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
88,883
Reaction score
12,042
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
By ADAM LIPTAK

The Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore, issued eight years ago this month, was widely understood to work like that tape recorder in “Mission: Impossible.” It was meant to produce a president and then self-destruct.

“Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances,” the majority famously said, “for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.”

That sentence, translated from high legal jargon into English, was often taken to mean this: The decision was a ticket for one ride only. It was not a precedent. It was a ruling, yes, but it was not law.
More: Sidebar - Bush v. Gore Set to Outlast Its Beneficiary - NYTimes.com
 

Rocko

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
17,516
Reaction score
4,510
Points
280
Location
NY
who btw got a d in nat science.
 

ba1614

Silver Member
Joined
May 9, 2009
Messages
3,812
Reaction score
884
Points
98
Location
Deep in the Northern Woods
If Gore did get robbed(I don't believe he did), It was the luckiest thing to happen to America in some time. I shudder to think of Gore dealing with those 4yrs.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
116,376
Reaction score
29,560
Points
2,220
Location
Location, location
Thank God Clinton and Gore decided to send Elian back to Fidel and choose Easter weekend to send in the stormtroopers! Thank God they infuriated enough Cuban Americans to have Florida go Republican!!!
 

del

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
52,099
Reaction score
10,833
Points
2,030
Location
on a one way cul-de-sac
if the people who presumably knew him best in the state of tennessee could have stomached voting for him, florida would have been moot.


go figure, huh?
 

Liability

Locked Account.
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
35,447
Reaction score
5,178
Points
48
Location
Mansion in Ravi's Head
By Luke Johnson

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens writes in his new memoir, Five Chiefs, that the George W. Bush campaign's 2000 appeal to the United States Supreme Court over the Florida recount was "frivolous" and never should have been granted.

He recalls bumping into Justice Stephen Breyer at a Christmas party and the two having a brief conversation about the Bush application to halt the recount by issuing a stay. "We agreed that the application was frivolous," he writes. "To secure a stay, a litigant must show that one is necessary to prevent a legally cognizable irreparable injury. Bush's attorneys had failed to make any such showing."

By a five-to-four vote, the court granted the stay. "What I still regard as a frivolous stay application kept the court extremely busy for four days," he writes. He adds that no justice has ever cited the opinions that provided the basis for their ruling.

Indeed, the court -- unusually -- limited its decision "to the present circumstances," meaning that it did not want it to become a precedent.
More: John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal To Supreme Court Was 'Frivolous'
And if Stevens says so it must be so?

Psst. The Bush appeal was -- uhm -- GRANTED. That kind of places Mr. Justice Dimbulb in the minority camp.

So, what Stevens considers a "frivolous" appeal was found not to be.

Stevens, as was so frequently the case, was just -- what's that word again? -- oh yeah -- wrong.
 
Last edited:

Political Junky

Gold Member
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
25,793
Reaction score
3,984
Points
280
By Luke Johnson

Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens writes in his new memoir, Five Chiefs, that the George W. Bush campaign's 2000 appeal to the United States Supreme Court over the Florida recount was "frivolous" and never should have been granted.

He recalls bumping into Justice Stephen Breyer at a Christmas party and the two having a brief conversation about the Bush application to halt the recount by issuing a stay. "We agreed that the application was frivolous," he writes. "To secure a stay, a litigant must show that one is necessary to prevent a legally cognizable irreparable injury. Bush's attorneys had failed to make any such showing."

By a five-to-four vote, the court granted the stay. "What I still regard as a frivolous stay application kept the court extremely busy for four days," he writes. He adds that no justice has ever cited the opinions that provided the basis for their ruling.

Indeed, the court -- unusually -- limited its decision "to the present circumstances," meaning that it did not want it to become a precedent.
More: John Paul Stevens: Bush Appeal To Supreme Court Was 'Frivolous'
Thank you, Justice Stevens.
 

Amelia

Rookie
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
21,830
Reaction score
5,442
Points
0
Location
Packerland!
if the people who presumably knew him best in the state of tennessee could have stomached voting for him, florida would have been moot.


go figure, huh?
While that may be true - it is irrelevant.

Gore Won Florida

The media nullified Florida by reporting it decided before the state was done voting.

The right thing was done. It was a mess from start to finish.


But the right thing was done in the end.


Thank God.
 
OP
Lakhota

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
88,883
Reaction score
12,042
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
  • Thanks
Reactions: del

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
51,714
Reaction score
16,129
Points
2,290
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Who gives a shit? It's in the past. It's done and over with and can't be changed. Move on already.
 
OP
Lakhota

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
88,883
Reaction score
12,042
Points
2,220
Location
Native America
You know it's a slow news day when someone wants to rehash this worn out shit.
It's not rehash when a former Supreme Court Justice who was involved in the decision finally makes a personal public statement about it.
 

del

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
52,099
Reaction score
10,833
Points
2,030
Location
on a one way cul-de-sac
You know it's a slow news day when someone wants to rehash this worn out shit.
It's not rehash when a former Supreme Court Justice who was involved in the decision finally makes a personal public statement about it.
uh, yeah, it is. :lol:

definitely a slow news day when anybody solicits stephens opinion on anything.

the overwhelming reaction to this was probably *who?* followed by *shrug*
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top