[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucY7JOfg6G4]Vietnam War Hearing: John Kerry Testimony - Vietnam Veterans Against the War (1971) - YouTube[/ame]
I just watched the complete footage of his congressional testimony for the first time, and I found nothing particularly offensive or disparaging to the troops. John Kerry did not support the war effort as a whole, and thus the troops, by proxy, were not supported by him either. However, it seemed to me like his sentiments arose out of having experienced the war first-hand as a participant, not because he had any particular hatred or disrespect for his fellow troops. All this being said, in this testimony he was acting as a representative of the veterans against Vietnam. Thus, despite his relatively limited experience in the war due to his injuries, his stories or accounts of the war crimes of soldiers do not necessarily come from his own eyes, and I presume come from stories he has heard from other veterans. I see no purpose as to why he or others would lie about crimes committed by their fellow troops.
By any stretch of the imagination, it's not too hard to believe that there were atrocities committed in Vietnam, aside from the infamous My Lai massacre, that were never reported or that there was no evidence for. I don't mean to speculate in such a way, but logically if there was one incident, in a war with thousands of like-minded participants, then I doubt it was an isolated one. John Kerry, to me, simply seemed to be drawing attention to the darker aspects of our role in the region, and the futile attempt to fight Communism and win the hearts and minds of the Vietnamese people.
At any rate, his congressional testimony seemed to me to be focused primarily on SUPPORT for the veterans, stating that they had been forgotten by their government and their fellow countrymen. He advocated for better health services for returning veterans, and a greater respect for black soldiers who had served; things of that nature. Once again, I saw nothing that was particularly offensive in his statements.
Now, I already know what critics of my comments will say, which is that this footage of his testimony was heavily edited and that it left out some incriminating statement that would change everything. Or perhaps they just simply disagree with me that his statements were not controversial. Whatever it is, I believe John Kerry brought up many good points in his testimony about the Vietnam war, no matter what his personal political motives were. I think it would be very hard to prove that his only motivation for such testimony were to springboard his political career.
Regarding his Purple Hearts, many, many soldiers received Purple Hearts, "against their will" so to speak, for injuries minor to severe. Some deserved it, some did not, but to my knowledge it was not the soldier who decided whether they should receive a Purple Heart. Even if he was undeserving of these awards, or his Silver Star, or anything else, that seems to me to be a moot point compared to his very important testimony before Congress. We could argue for years about one man's awards that he received in Vietnam, but I think the bulk of our focus should be on the mishandling of the Vietnam War, and in particular the mishandling of the young American men of that generation.