John Brennan, director of the CIA under obama hid information showing the Russians wanted hilary.

Hopefully john brennan will one day be indicted....till then, we have this....


The staff alleged that Brennan "suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts."

Yes, you read that correctly. The best intelligence suggested Russia favored Clinton in the 2016 election, but CIA Director John Brennan covered that up — even when CIA analysts complained.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," Fleitz added. "Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."

--------

"For example, although the protocols require intelligence community assessments to be 'community products' and vetted with all intelligence agencies and analysts with equities in a given subject, only three intelligence agencies were asked to draft this assessment: the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI," he wrote. "With the 14 other intelligence agencies left out, the three participating agencies included only two dozen 'handpicked' analysts."

Worse, Fleitz said his sources inside the House Intelligence Committee told him "the actual drafting of the intelligence community assessment was done by three close associates of former CIA Director Brennan, who has proven to be the most politicized intelligence chief in American history. Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts."

He is relying on what the House Intelligence Committee is telling him. That was clearly a partisan investigation. They created the premise and twisted the facts to make it fit. The Senate Intelligence Committee followed the facts and made their conclusion.

The Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. The Russians used social media to air pro-Trump ads. Trump's campaign manager gave campaign information and internal polling data to a associate with ties to Russian Intelligence.

You are the one who is gullible. You wouldn't make ensign because you are a fool.
 
Hopefully john brennan will one day be indicted....till then, we have this....


The staff alleged that Brennan "suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts."

Yes, you read that correctly. The best intelligence suggested Russia favored Clinton in the 2016 election, but CIA Director John Brennan covered that up — even when CIA analysts complained.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," Fleitz added. "Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."

--------

"For example, although the protocols require intelligence community assessments to be 'community products' and vetted with all intelligence agencies and analysts with equities in a given subject, only three intelligence agencies were asked to draft this assessment: the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI," he wrote. "With the 14 other intelligence agencies left out, the three participating agencies included only two dozen 'handpicked' analysts."

Worse, Fleitz said his sources inside the House Intelligence Committee told him "the actual drafting of the intelligence community assessment was done by three close associates of former CIA Director Brennan, who has proven to be the most politicized intelligence chief in American history. Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts."

He is relying on what the House Intelligence Committee is telling him. That was clearly a partisan investigation. They created the premise and twisted the facts to make it fit. The Senate Intelligence Committee followed the facts and made their conclusion.

The Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. The Russians used social media to air pro-Trump ads. Trump's campaign manager gave campaign information and internal polling data to a associate with ties to Russian Intelligence.

You are the one who is gullible. You wouldn't make ensign because you are a fool.



Its never been proven in any court that the Russians hacked DNC servers or Podesta at all. In fact, Concord Management- a Russian concern- was indicted for this and actually BEAT the charges.

Further, Wikileaks CEO Julian Assange admitted that he was NOT working with the Russians at all.
 
According to conservative blog pjmedia.
Seems legit.
Where do you think you will get news of evidence that John Brennan was anti Trump and pro Hillary
and using his position to influence the election?
The New York Times? This news about Brennan is surprising no one.
And the disgraced fired chief of the CIA is still peddling his anti Trump venom on MSNBC
which, as everyone knows, is the electronic equivalent of the He Man Woman Hater's Club.


If you don't get that reference, which you probably won't, just let me know and I'll explain it to you.
 
He is relying on what the House Intelligence Committee is telling him. That was clearly a partisan investigation. They created the premise and twisted the facts to make it fit. The Senate Intelligence Committee followed the facts and made their conclusion.

The Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. The Russians used social media to air pro-Trump ads. Trump's campaign manager gave campaign information and internal polling data to a associate with ties to Russian Intelligence.

You are the one who is gullible. You wouldn't make ensign because you are a fool.
Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia! Give it a rest, Jan.
 
Hopefully john brennan will one day be indicted....till then, we have this....


The staff alleged that Brennan "suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts."

Yes, you read that correctly. The best intelligence suggested Russia favored Clinton in the 2016 election, but CIA Director John Brennan covered that up — even when CIA analysts complained.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," Fleitz added. "Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."

--------

"For example, although the protocols require intelligence community assessments to be 'community products' and vetted with all intelligence agencies and analysts with equities in a given subject, only three intelligence agencies were asked to draft this assessment: the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI," he wrote. "With the 14 other intelligence agencies left out, the three participating agencies included only two dozen 'handpicked' analysts."

Worse, Fleitz said his sources inside the House Intelligence Committee told him "the actual drafting of the intelligence community assessment was done by three close associates of former CIA Director Brennan, who has proven to be the most politicized intelligence chief in American history. Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts."
The sooner the better this self proclaimed muslim/communist ends up in jail the better it will be for the country, How he ever got into the position he was in is a mystery to true Americans
 
The sooner the better this self proclaimed muslim/communist ends up in jail the better it will be for the country, How he ever got into the position he was in is a mystery to true Americans
I think it says a lot about the rat's nest in the upper echelons of government that someone like Brennan
could ever reach such a high level of achievement.
It also says a lot about MSNBC that they are paying this scumbag and giving him a platform from which
to continue to spew out his disinformation.
 
According to conservative blog pjmedia.
Seems legit.


Moron....the story isn't from Pjmedia, they are reporting on it....are you this stupid in real life or do you just pretend to be this stupid when you post?
The leaks need to be stopped. Whoever told them that should be behind bars.

So now you're concerned about leaks..... :auiqs.jpg:

Just highlighting the hypocrisy of the right.

I’m not really concerned about the leak, mostly because I don’t think it was a leak. I think they just made it up.
 
According to conservative blog pjmedia.
Seems legit.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election,"
 
Hopefully john brennan will one day be indicted....till then, we have this....


The staff alleged that Brennan "suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts."

Yes, you read that correctly. The best intelligence suggested Russia favored Clinton in the 2016 election, but CIA Director John Brennan covered that up — even when CIA analysts complained.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election," Fleitz added. "Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."

--------

"For example, although the protocols require intelligence community assessments to be 'community products' and vetted with all intelligence agencies and analysts with equities in a given subject, only three intelligence agencies were asked to draft this assessment: the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI," he wrote. "With the 14 other intelligence agencies left out, the three participating agencies included only two dozen 'handpicked' analysts."

Worse, Fleitz said his sources inside the House Intelligence Committee told him "the actual drafting of the intelligence community assessment was done by three close associates of former CIA Director Brennan, who has proven to be the most politicized intelligence chief in American history. Contrary to common practice for controversial intelligence community assessments, Brennan’s team allowed no dissenting views or even an annex with reviews by outside experts."

He is relying on what the House Intelligence Committee is telling him. That was clearly a partisan investigation. They created the premise and twisted the facts to make it fit. The Senate Intelligence Committee followed the facts and made their conclusion.

The Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. The Russians used social media to air pro-Trump ads. Trump's campaign manager gave campaign information and internal polling data to a associate with ties to Russian Intelligence.

You are the one who is gullible. You wouldn't make ensign because you are a fool.



Its never been proven in any court that the Russians hacked DNC servers or Podesta at all. In fact, Concord Management- a Russian concern- was indicted for this and actually BEAT the charges.

Further, Wikileaks CEO Julian Assange admitted that he was NOT working with the Russians at all.

Because the government would have been forced to reveal intelligence sources. Our intelligence agencies and the FBI agree Russia hacked the DNC servers.

Assange is a liar. He was being paid off by Putin.
 
He is relying on what the House Intelligence Committee is telling him. That was clearly a partisan investigation. They created the premise and twisted the facts to make it fit. The Senate Intelligence Committee followed the facts and made their conclusion.

The Russians hacked the DNC servers and Podesta's e-mails. The Russians used social media to air pro-Trump ads. Trump's campaign manager gave campaign information and internal polling data to a associate with ties to Russian Intelligence.

You are the one who is gullible. You wouldn't make ensign because you are a fool.
Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia! Give it a rest, Jan.

I am not. In 2020, we see Russians putting out misinformation about Biden. Clearly they are helping Trump as they did in 2016.
 
According to conservative blog pjmedia.
Seems legit.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election,"

He says they told him. He has no independent information of it. The House Intelligence Committee's investigation was a fraud. They decided what they wanted and made the facts fit whether it did or not.
 
According to conservative blog pjmedia.
Seems legit.

"House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election,"

He says they told him. He has no independent information of it. The House Intelligence Committee's investigation was a fraud. They decided what they wanted and made the facts fit whether it did or not.

Only a matter of time now
 

Forum List

Back
Top