Joe Biden and Merrick Garland Have Misappropriated Funds for Jack Smith

[excalibur]

A recent Motion by Trump attorneys in Florida show how Biden and Garland have been funding the Jack Smith Show.

They have taken money from a program specifically funded by Congress and shoveled some of to Jack Smith. This is a misappropriation of funds.

A violation of the Appropriations Clause (in addition to violating the Appointments Clause).

Begins at 12:23 for the Appropriations Clause violation.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Joe is a total piece of dirt con man.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

A recent Motion by Trump attorneys in Florida show how Biden and Garland have been funding the Jack Smith Show.

They have taken money from a program specifically funded by Congress and shoveled some of to Jack Smith. This is a misappropriation of funds.

A violation of the Appropriations Clause (in addition to violating the Appointments Clause).

Begins at 12:23 for the Appropriations Clause violation.

Except....That didn't happen.

 

[skews13]

A recent Motion by Trump attorneys in Florida show how Biden and Garland have been funding the Jack Smith Show.

They have taken money from a program specifically funded by Congress and shoveled some of to Jack Smith. This is a misappropriation of funds.

A violation of the Appropriations Clause (in addition to violating the Appointments Clause).

Begins at 12:23 for the Appropriations Clause violation.

The DOJ can appoint with funds, any prosecutor it deems fit for the prosecution of crimes.

The DOJ doesn't work for Biden.

Biden can't appropriate funds. Only Congess can.

Trumps lawyers have no say in the matter. They don't even get to file a motion.

Now back under the bridge troll.

 

[excalibur]

The DOJ can appoint with funds, any prosecutor it deems fit for the prosecution of crimes.

The DOJ doesn't work for Biden.

Biden can't appropriate funds. Only Congess can.

Trumps lawyers have no say in the matter. They don't even get to file a motion.

Funny, they just filed a Motion.

And yeah, only Congress can appropriate funds, and they've appropriated none for Jack Smith, yet Biden and Garland have funded him by misappropriating funds from another part of the DOJ. Maybe you could look up the definition of 'misappropriate'? Duh!

 

[excalibur]

Except....That didn't happen.

Didn't read the Motion, did you.

 

[mamooth]

It's fascinating, this cult bubble that the Trump cultists live in, and the avalanche of propaganda that those in the bubble get exposed to. Then they come here to parrot it.

Nobody else cares about it.

 

[Death-Ninja]

The DOJ can appoint with funds, any prosecutor it deems fit for the prosecution of crimes.

The DOJ doesn't work for Biden.

Biden can't appropriate funds. Only Congess can.

Trumps lawyers have no say in the matter. They don't even get to file a motion.

Now back under the bridge troll.

You impossibly ******* stupid moron, both you and the other sociopath, both of you ice cold two digit IQ'd morons, Smith was clearly an illegal appointment, this is frankly indisputable, the statute expired, and has not been signed back into law!

Folks are paying attention to these sociopaths, what they really think, are you observing them? These cretins believe this a kingdom where whatever the **** they want, is the way it goes, they possess zero understanding of civics 101, let alone the complexity of the law!

 

[Crepitus]

A recent Motion by Trump attorneys in Florida show how Biden and Garland have been funding the Jack Smith Show.

They have taken money from a program specifically funded by Congress and shoveled some of to Jack Smith. This is a misappropriation of funds.

A violation of the Appropriations Clause (in addition to violating the Appointments Clause).

Begins at 12:23 for the Appropriations Clause violation.

Dude, tRump's attorneys are babes in the woods here. They haven't got a clue what they're doing and their motions are nonsense.

 

[Crepitus]

You impossibly ******* stupid moron, both you and the other sociopath, both of you ice cold two digit IQ'd morons, Smith was clearly an illegal appointment, this is frankly indisputable, the statute expired, and has not been signed back into law!

Folks are paying attention to these sociopaths, what they really think, are you observing them? These cretins believe this a kingdom where whatever the **** they want, is the way it goes, they possess zero understanding of civics 101, let alone the complexity of the law!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I don't think excalibur undersands that when people here have seen his latest title for a post, they wonder, "What is he lying about now?"

 

[Rawley]

Dude, tRump's attorneys are babes in the woods here. They haven't got a clue what they're doing and their motions are nonsense.

LOL Y'all said the same thing about their motion to disqualify Fani

 

[Rogue AI]

The DOJ can appoint with funds, any prosecutor it deems fit for the prosecution of crimes.

The DOJ doesn't work for Biden.

Biden can't appropriate funds. Only Congess can.

Trumps lawyers have no say in the matter. They don't even get to file a motion.

Now back under the bridge troll.

Remind us which branch the DOJ falls under? I'll wait. You clowns are funny.

 

[Crepitus]

LOL Y'all said the same thing about their motion to disqualify Fani

It's not going anywhere.

 

[Rawley]

It's not going anywhere.

No doubt she's getting disqualified, most likely disbarred.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No doubt she's getting disqualified, most likely disbarred.

No, not in slightest, Rawley.

 

[Crepitus]

No doubt she's getting disqualified, most likely disbarred.

No

 

[skews13]

unny, they just filed a Motion.

And yeah, only Congress can appropriate funds, and they've appropriated none for Jack Smith, yet Biden and Garland have funded him by misappropriating funds from another part of the DOJ. Maybe you could look up the definition of 'misappropriate'? Duh!

That sound you hear is the judge laughing his ass off while deciding whether or not impose sanctions on yet another trope of Trumps clown show attorney circus.

 

[Rawley]

No, not in slightest, Rawley.

Wanna Bet?

 

[Rawley]

No

Wanna Bet?