Joe Biden accused of Grabbing Secret services wife’s breast in 2009!

[bripat9643]

This is quite a shock coming from a right wing rag.

Judicial Watch is a well respected organization.

Sorry, but this isn't the 'Humor' forum.

It must be the retard forum where brain dead morons like you believe they can post without being ridiculed.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Joe calls bullshit on this one:

 

[konradv]

This is quite a shock coming from a right wing rag.

Judicial Watch is a well respected organization.

Sorry, but this isn't the 'Humor' forum.

It must be the retard forum where brain dead morons like you believe they can post without being ridiculed.

Why should it stop me? It's never stopped you.

 

[jknowgood]

He said he could, he didn't actually do it.

Yeah, right. You don’t think St Trumpy grabbed His share of ***** in His day?

He said he could, but if he did. I'm pretty sure they didn't mind. I mean when he said that, he was a democrat. Even then he didn't do it, Biden grabbed them by the titties! You will defend this!

 

[jknowgood]

Joe Biden accused of Grabbing Secret services wife’s breast in 2009!

That is a lot of breasts to grab..I bet it makes Trump sad that someone beat him to it...

Dang you loons went back to the eighties, on Trump. Lol

 

[Norman]

Judicial Watch Files Suit after Secret Service Admits to Destroying Records Related to Alleged Biden Altercation with Secret Service Agent - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe...

www.judicialwatch.org

This guy is a fcukin PERV! Wtf!
Joe Biden grab this guys woman’s tits! And the Secret Service is trying to desperately hide the altercation

Is it for sure breasts and not hair?

Grabbing and not sniffing?

 

[LeftofLeft]

Meanwhile, St Trumpy can grab ‘em by the ***** whenever He feels like it.

Bullshit. Trump EXPRESSED a desire to grab a specific woman’s *****. He didn’t actually do it yet you liberals took that and tried to make him a groping perv like Biden and Clinton before him who have accosted many women against their will.

 

[bripat9643]

Judicial Watch Files Suit after Secret Service Admits to Destroying Records Related to Alleged Biden Altercation with Secret Service Agent - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe...

www.judicialwatch.org

This guy is a fcukin PERV! Wtf!
Joe Biden grab this guys woman’s tits! And the Secret Service is trying to desperately hide the altercation

Secret Service Inadvertently Confirms Gateway Pundit Story About Biden Sexually Assaulting Agent’s Girlfriend

Secret Service Inadvertently Confirms Gateway Pundit Story About Biden Sexually Assaulting Agent's Girlfriend

 

[playtime]

Judicial Watch


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and a very poor fact check record.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check


'nuff said.

 

[bripat9643]

Judicial Watch


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and a very poor fact check record.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check


'nuff said.

Fact Check sites are fake news.

 

[playtime]

Judicial Watch


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and a very poor fact check record.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check


'nuff said.

Fact Check sites are fake news.

 

[JustAGuy1]

Judicial Watch Files Suit after Secret Service Admits to Destroying Records Related to Alleged Biden Altercation with Secret Service Agent - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe...

www.judicialwatch.org

This guy is a fcukin PERV! Wtf!
Joe Biden grab this guys woman’s tits! And the Secret Service is trying to desperately hide the altercation

He should have grabbed her by the *****, then you would love him!

Lets let Pedo Joe take old of someone you love breasts.

 

[JustAGuy1]

He said he could, he didn't actually do it.

Yeah, right. You don’t think St Trumpy grabbed His share of ***** in His day?

As a ***** yourself did he grab you?

 

[bripat9643]

Judicial Watch


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate Judicial Watch Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories, and a very poor fact check record.

Detailed Report
Reasoning: Extreme Right, Conspiracy, Propaganda, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Country: USA
World Press Freedom Rank: USA 45/180
Judicial Watch - Media Bias/Fact Check


'nuff said.

Fact Check sites are fake news.

View attachment 384365

A so-called "fact check" journalist is just a regular fake news journalist with another name.

 

[Doc7505]

Judicial Watch Files Suit after Secret Service Admits to Destroying Records Related to Alleged Biden Altercation with Secret Service Agent - Judicial Watch

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe...

www.judicialwatch.org

This guy is a fcukin PERV! Wtf!
Joe Biden grab this guys woman’s tits! And the Secret Service is trying to desperately hide the altercation

~~~~~~
There are other stories from China Joe's secret service mentioning that he used to deliberately expose himself to female secret service agents regularly. He isn't just demented. he's a perv. Secret Service records prove it true.... That's why his code name was "Creepy Uncle"....