jobs, Jobs, JOBS! Scream GOP. But why won't they define "jobs"?

Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?
 
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

Anyone notice when a bolshie critiques Republicans for "screaming," he or she uses all capital letters (the equivalent of online screaming) in doing so?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

Do I interpret that to mean that of the $7.8 trillion Obama has spent , Republicans should just shut up if he wishes to add another trillion to the debt for which 3 generations down the line must complete payment for their grandparents' educations?

Why didn't he prioritize education over medical care? Please do tell. Oh wait. A guy who doesn't budget funding doesn't know what he's doing anyway. We must lower our expectations, and let the big spender decimate the rest of us because he's black? Please make some sense about spending more money on some more projects of any kind when we're already open to a grave fiscal hazard imminently, won't you, rdean?

You need to get your mind around this item: someone who has eschewed doing his job of coordinating congress to pass a manageable budget and overdoes spending in terms of unsustainable amounts, now wants to compound all previous errors to squelch another horrendous burden on the backs of taxpayers he obviously cares nothing about. He's already spent rich people into the poor house. Aren't you just thrilled? People who used to be rich but are now in the poor house can no longer sustain hiring employees who make money that pays taxes, so some of them have to be let go. Everybody's in the same boat here, rdean. No money, no jobs, money taken from job-givers who become disabled from any new hiring and a million a year or more graduating from universities going 4 or 5 years with not a single viable job prospect because Obama is creating government jobs, but not enough to sustain, because his credit rating has been downgraded twice by the fiscal sector.

If you didn't have your mind nailed shut, you would be concerned about the current debt: $16,525,677,000,000.00. US National Debt Clock

The only thing Republicans aren't qualified for is living in fear of an out-of-control federal government that has dishonorably tried to convert a free republic into a parasitic communist nation in which the lord-over government "gives" to serfs who must grovel in long lines for it.
 
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

Anyone notice when a bolshie critiques Republicans for "screaming," he or she uses all capital letters (the equivalent of online screaming) in doing so?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

Do I interpret that to mean that of the $7.8 trillion Obama has spent , Republicans should just shut up if he wishes to add another trillion to the debt for which 3 generations down the line must complete payment for their grandparents' educations?

Why didn't he prioritize education over medical care? Please do tell. Oh wait. A guy who doesn't budget funding doesn't know what he's doing anyway. We must lower our expectations, and let the big spender decimate the rest of us because he's black? Please make some sense about spending more money on some more projects of any kind when we're already open to a grave fiscal hazard imminently, won't you, rdean?

You need to get your mind around this item: someone who has eschewed doing his job of coordinating congress to pass a manageable budget and overdoes spending in terms of unsustainable amounts, now wants to compound all previous errors to squelch another horrendous burden on the backs of taxpayers he obviously cares nothing about. He's already spent rich people into the poor house. Aren't you just thrilled? People who used to be rich but are now in the poor house can no longer sustain hiring employees who make money that pays taxes, so some of them have to be let go. Everybody's in the same boat here, rdean. No money, no jobs, money taken from job-givers who become disabled from any new hiring and a million a year or more graduating from universities going 4 or 5 years with not a single viable job prospect because Obama is creating government jobs, but not enough to sustain, because his credit rating has been downgraded twice by the fiscal sector.

If you didn't have your mind nailed shut, you would be concerned about the current debt: $16,525,677,000,000.00. US National Debt Clock

The only thing Republicans aren't qualified for is living in fear of an out-of-control federal government that has dishonorably tried to convert a free republic into a parasitic communist nation in which the lord-over government "gives" to serfs who must grovel in long lines for it.

Take away the redistribution of wealth that came from the Bush Tax cuts and the two unpaid for wars and the cost of rebuilding Iraq and the cost of taking care of tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq and the cost of losing millions of jobs which moved to China from 2001 to 2008 and the cost of deregulating Wall Street, how much of that debt is "Obama's fault"?

According to Republicans, "All of it".

2000_-_OopsI_Did_It_Again.jpg
 
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

Anyone notice when a bolshie critiques Republicans for "screaming," he or she uses all capital letters (the equivalent of online screaming) in doing so?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

Do I interpret that to mean that of the $7.8 trillion Obama has spent , Republicans should just shut up if he wishes to add another trillion to the debt for which 3 generations down the line must complete payment for their grandparents' educations?

Why didn't he prioritize education over medical care? Please do tell. Oh wait. A guy who doesn't budget funding doesn't know what he's doing anyway. We must lower our expectations, and let the big spender decimate the rest of us because he's black? Please make some sense about spending more money on some more projects of any kind when we're already open to a grave fiscal hazard imminently, won't you, rdean?

You need to get your mind around this item: someone who has eschewed doing his job of coordinating congress to pass a manageable budget and overdoes spending in terms of unsustainable amounts, now wants to compound all previous errors to squelch another horrendous burden on the backs of taxpayers he obviously cares nothing about. He's already spent rich people into the poor house. Aren't you just thrilled? People who used to be rich but are now in the poor house can no longer sustain hiring employees who make money that pays taxes, so some of them have to be let go. Everybody's in the same boat here, rdean. No money, no jobs, money taken from job-givers who become disabled from any new hiring and a million a year or more graduating from universities going 4 or 5 years with not a single viable job prospect because Obama is creating government jobs, but not enough to sustain, because his credit rating has been downgraded twice by the fiscal sector.

If you didn't have your mind nailed shut, you would be concerned about the current debt: $16,525,677,000,000.00. US National Debt Clock

The only thing Republicans aren't qualified for is living in fear of an out-of-control federal government that has dishonorably tried to convert a free republic into a parasitic communist nation in which the lord-over government "gives" to serfs who must grovel in long lines for it.

So taking $5.2 trillion out of the revenue for the rich by reducing the top tax bracket from 35% to 25% for the Representative Ryan budget or somewhat less than that with the Senator Toomey budget, reducing top tax bracket from 35% to 28%, is responsible.

The fundamental flaw in your argument is that what you are arguing for and what the Republicans are doing to this country are almost exactly opposite. But that is what you are supposed to believe. Welcome to the party of the stupid.

See the bitch of the matter is that the Republicans know it is against their best interest to cut education too much, bad for their work force. So the Republicans keep education, take the tax cuts, and then blame the Democrats for wanting to fund their liberal agenda. Hence the deficit 'cause by the liberals'. Keep supporting the Republicans and everything will be better for you soon or later. "God Bless America!!!"
 
Take away the redistribution of wealth that came from the Bush Tax cuts and the two unpaid for wars and the cost of rebuilding Iraq and the cost of taking care of tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq and the cost of losing millions of jobs which moved to China from 2001 to 2008 and the cost of deregulating Wall Street, how much of that debt is "Obama's fault"?

According to Republicans, "All of it".

2000_-_OopsI_Did_It_Again.jpg

But is so much money went to pay for the war someone must have gotten really rich off that. :confused: Who, I say who, could it possibly be?
 
Take away the redistribution of wealth that came from the Bush Tax cuts and the two unpaid for wars and the cost of rebuilding Iraq and the cost of taking care of tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq and the cost of losing millions of jobs which moved to China from 2001 to 2008 and the cost of deregulating Wall Street, how much of that debt is "Obama's fault"?

According to Republicans, "All of it".

2000_-_OopsI_Did_It_Again.jpg

But is so much money went to pay for the war someone must have gotten really rich off that. :confused: Who, I say who, could it possibly be?

It was probably just the American people who got all that money and now we are just having to pay it back.

(Anyone notice we are getting screwed yet?)
 
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?

It may not be his fault but he can stop making appearances on the Tonight show when so many people are struggling and out of work.
 
Hence the deficit 'cause by the liberals'. Keep supporting the Republicans and everything will be better for you soon or later. "God Bless America!!!"

too stupid and liberal of course, Republicans since Jefferson have introduced 30 Balanced Budget Amendments all of which were killed by libturds. Newt's passed the House and fell one vote short in the Senate. A balanced budget means a deficit is illegal, by the way.

If as a liberal you have 25% of a brain, normal for a liberal, that should tell even you who is responsible for deficits.
 
Hence the deficit 'cause by the liberals'. Keep supporting the Republicans and everything will be better for you soon or later. "God Bless America!!!"

too stupid and liberal of course, Republicans since Jefferson have introduced 30 Balanced Budget Amendments all of which were killed by libturds. Newt's passed the House and fell one vote short in the Senate. A balanced budget means a deficit is illegal, by the way.

If as a liberal you have 25% of a brain, normal for a liberal, that should tell even you who is responsible for deficits.

Take away the redistribution of wealth that came from the Bush Tax cuts and the two unpaid for wars and the cost of rebuilding Iraq and the cost of taking care of tens of thousands of Americans maimed in Iraq and the cost of losing millions of jobs which moved to China from 2001 to 2008 and the cost of deregulating Wall Street, how much of that debt is "Obama's fault"?

According to Republicans, "All of it". Thanks for proving my point.
 
Anyone notice how the right wingers on this site scream about how much they hate Obama and one of the reasons is they say he never provided the jobs he "PROMISED"?

When he wants to invest in education, they scream it's too liberal or the money is better invested by giving to the "job creators" in tax cuts.

And they can't even answer a simple question. What is it they think they are qualified for? Three million jobs and they aren't qualified for any of them? Is that really Obama's fault?

It may not be his fault but he can stop making appearances on the Tonight show when so many people are struggling and out of work.

Huh?
 
Obama used the word "jobs" more often in his state of the union speech than ever before. He didnt define it either. ANd since he has been screaming about jobs for 4 years and hasn't delivered any, why is this thread about Republicans? Oh yeah, RDean is a hack.
 
Obama set a record for most people unemployed in American history

Obama is the biggest economic disaster since FDR

So, of course, our insane Batman Villain Republican Boy Deany blames....Republicans
 
You don't know why 3Mill jobs go unfilled?

Do you or do you not recall that it was the obama crew that extended UE pay to 99 weeks or more?

Why work when you can get some obama money
 
The UE had to be extended because when someone is unemployed it's hard to find a job since

1. There are not many jobs to apply to on a weekly basis

2. When there is a job to apply to there is a lot of competition.

3. When you are called for a interview the hiring process can be very long



So the UE had to be extended because it's takes about 8 to 10 months to find a job
 

Forum List

Back
Top