Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

[JoeB131]

Coming from the miserable idiot who cant wait to see millions of dead Jews and Israel destroyed...You and the mullahs have the same goal, of course you like the deal

Your inability to argue the point is duly noted.

Point is, we reject the deal, we are the bad guys in the eyes of the world, not the Mullahs.

 

[Jroc]

Coming from the miserable idiot who cant wait to see millions of dead Jews and Israel destroyed...You and the mullahs have the same goal, of course you like the deal

Your inability to argue the point is duly noted.

Point is, we reject the deal, we are the bad guys in the eyes of the world, not the Mullahs.

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

 

[Jroc]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

"No. 1, Iran will cheat," he added. "Second, suppose they don't cheat ... within a decade — 12 years at most — they'll be free to build and enrich uranium at whatever scale they want."

The inspections, which are part of the deal, are "completely porous." Furthermore, after a decade, Iran will be able to enrich uranium at any level, Netanyahu said.

"So I think, if the idea is, well, at least we get them away from the bomb — no, you don't," he added. "You at most might delay it, but I don't think you will because they could cheat. And if you delay it, they'll fan out with the capacity to make the nuclear fissile core necessary for atomic bomb."

Netanyahu Iran now has two paths to a nuclear bomb Washington Examiner

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

There's not a reason in the world why they should lose. You don't have to ask the world's permission before you build a weapon. No one does, and certainly not the US or Israel...

 

[EriktheRed]

Coming from the miserable idiot who cant wait to see millions of dead Jews and Israel destroyed...You and the mullahs have the same goal, of course you like the deal

Your inability to argue the point is duly noted.

Point is, we reject the deal, we are the bad guys in the eyes of the world, not the Mullahs.

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Other parties' motivations is ultimately beside the point.

 

[Jroc]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

There's not a reason in the world why they should lose. You don't have to ask the world's permission before you build a weapon. No one does, and certainly not the US or Israel...

List of parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Jroc]

Iran Already Sanitizing Nuclear Site, Intel Warns

The U.S. intelligence community has informed Congress of evidence that Iran was sanitizing its suspected nuclear military site at Parchin, in broad daylight, days after agreeing to a nuclear deal with world powers.

For senior lawmakers in both parties, the evidence calls into question Iran’s intention to fully account for the possible military dimensions of its current and past nuclear development. The International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran have a side agreement meant to resolve past suspicions about the Parchin site, and lawmakers' concerns about it has already become a flashpoint because they do not have access to its text.

Iran Already Sanitizing Nuclear Site Intel Warns - Bloomberg View

 

[PaintMyHouse]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

There's not a reason in the world why they should lose. You don't have to ask the world's permission before you build a weapon. No one does, and certainly not the US or Israel...

List of parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Yeah, no one give a ****...

 

[EriktheRed]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

There's not a reason in the world why they should lose. You don't have to ask the world's permission before you build a weapon. No one does, and certainly not the US or Israel...

List of parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Point?

 

[JoeB131]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

 

[Jroc]

"Iran has in fact been given two paths to the bomb: One is if they cheat and the second is if they keep to the deal," Netanyahu said. "They win either way."

There's not a reason in the world why they should lose. You don't have to ask the world's permission before you build a weapon. No one does, and certainly not the US or Israel...

List of parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Point?

Are you dense? Maybe you should reread what I responded to. you're not too bright are you?

 

[Jroc]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

30 years ago? they are funding terrorist, killing Americans, and holding American's hostage today not 30 years ago.

 

[Jroc]

American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

After extensive deliberation, the AJC opposes the Iran deal because instead of a better deal - dismantling sanctions for dismantling nuclear infrastructure - the deal the negotiators made will allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state.

The American Jewish Committee is one of the oldest and most centrist of American Jewish communal organizations.

It is a slow-moving, deliberative organization and it took its time coming to a decision on what virtually everyone discussing the nuclear deal with Iran has described as critically important, or, in the AJC’s words: “one of the most consequential policy issues in a generation.”

The AJC’s long-time executive director David Harris issued a statement expressing the organizations opposition to the deal on Wednesday, Aug. 5.

Harris, who has been at the helm of the AJC for 25 years, articulated the many steps taken by the AJC to come to its decision, and listed numbers of the people with whom its leadership met during its deliberations.

But after weighing the pros and the cons – all of which are familiar to those who are following the matter – at the conclusion of its deliberation, “AJC’s leadership concluded overwhelmingly that we must oppose this deal.”

The Jewish Press Centrist American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

 

[PoliticalChic]

American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

After extensive deliberation, the AJC opposes the Iran deal because instead of a better deal - dismantling sanctions for dismantling nuclear infrastructure - the deal the negotiators made will allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state.

The American Jewish Committee is one of the oldest and most centrist of American Jewish communal organizations.

It is a slow-moving, deliberative organization and it took its time coming to a decision on what virtually everyone discussing the nuclear deal with Iran has described as critically important, or, in the AJC’s words: “one of the most consequential policy issues in a generation.”

The AJC’s long-time executive director David Harris issued a statement expressing the organizations opposition to the deal on Wednesday, Aug. 5.

Harris, who has been at the helm of the AJC for 25 years, articulated the many steps taken by the AJC to come to its decision, and listed numbers of the people with whom its leadership met during its deliberations.

But after weighing the pros and the cons – all of which are familiar to those who are following the matter – at the conclusion of its deliberation, “AJC’s leadership concluded overwhelmingly that we must oppose this deal.”

The Jewish Press Centrist American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

Does Chuck Schumer know he's Jewish?

 

[Jroc]

American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

After extensive deliberation, the AJC opposes the Iran deal because instead of a better deal - dismantling sanctions for dismantling nuclear infrastructure - the deal the negotiators made will allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state.

The American Jewish Committee is one of the oldest and most centrist of American Jewish communal organizations.

It is a slow-moving, deliberative organization and it took its time coming to a decision on what virtually everyone discussing the nuclear deal with Iran has described as critically important, or, in the AJC’s words: “one of the most consequential policy issues in a generation.”

The AJC’s long-time executive director David Harris issued a statement expressing the organizations opposition to the deal on Wednesday, Aug. 5.

Harris, who has been at the helm of the AJC for 25 years, articulated the many steps taken by the AJC to come to its decision, and listed numbers of the people with whom its leadership met during its deliberations.

But after weighing the pros and the cons – all of which are familiar to those who are following the matter – at the conclusion of its deliberation, “AJC’s leadership concluded overwhelmingly that we must oppose this deal.”

The Jewish Press Centrist American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

Does Chuck Schumer know he's Jewish?

He'd be Asian if he could gain more power by saying so, all else takes a back seat to scum bags like Smuckie Schumer. I heard he'd like a supreme court position when Ginsburg goes.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

30 years ago? they are funding terrorist, killing Americans, and holding American's hostage today not 30 years ago.

There are no hostages, so stop saying that. And they aren't killing Americans either.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

30 years ago? they are funding terrorist, killing Americans, and holding American's hostage today not 30 years ago.

There are no hostages, so stop saying that. And they aren't killing Americans either.

Iran Release 4 Americans Now Iran Release 4 Americans Now

 

[PaintMyHouse]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

30 years ago? they are funding terrorist, killing Americans, and holding American's hostage today not 30 years ago.

There are no hostages, so stop saying that. And they aren't killing Americans either.

Iran Release 4 Americans Now Iran Release 4 Americans Now

Prisoners, not hostages, and two obviously broke the law. The other two, harder to say but none of them are hostages. Iran, which you won't believe of course, is a nation and therefore has a right to enforce its laws...
Who Are the Four Americans Still Being Held in Iran - NBC News

 

[Jroc]

We are the bad guys?..LOL.. John Kerry taking point. The islamonazis are the scum. they played that Idiot Kerry, and his boss Obama for all they were worth, which isn't much. The Europeans, Russia, China, Just want the oil and to do business with the mullahs

Guy, it's common sense, you sit down in a room and negotiate an agreement and everyone else in that room carries out the agreement and then you renege on the agreement, you are the bad guy. Everyone else in that room is going to think you are the shithead.

Yes, everyone else wants to do business with the Mullahs. they really think it's silly to punish a country for something they did 30 years ago.

Sorry, man, the Zionists don't get their way on shit anymore.

30 years ago? they are funding terrorist, killing Americans, and holding American's hostage today not 30 years ago.

There are no hostages, so stop saying that. And they aren't killing Americans either.

Iran Release 4 Americans Now Iran Release 4 Americans Now

Prisoners, not hostages, and two obviously broke the law. The other two, harder to say but none of them are hostages. Iran, which you won't believe of course, is a nation and therefore has a right to enforce its laws...
Who Are the Four Americans Still Being Held in Iran - NBC News

NBC loves the mullah hates Americans

 

[Jroc]

American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

After extensive deliberation, the AJC opposes the Iran deal because instead of a better deal - dismantling sanctions for dismantling nuclear infrastructure - the deal the negotiators made will allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state.

The American Jewish Committee is one of the oldest and most centrist of American Jewish communal organizations.

It is a slow-moving, deliberative organization and it took its time coming to a decision on what virtually everyone discussing the nuclear deal with Iran has described as critically important, or, in the AJC’s words: “one of the most consequential policy issues in a generation.”

The AJC’s long-time executive director David Harris issued a statement expressing the organizations opposition to the deal on Wednesday, Aug. 5.

Harris, who has been at the helm of the AJC for 25 years, articulated the many steps taken by the AJC to come to its decision, and listed numbers of the people with whom its leadership met during its deliberations.

But after weighing the pros and the cons – all of which are familiar to those who are following the matter – at the conclusion of its deliberation, “AJC’s leadership concluded overwhelmingly that we must oppose this deal.”

The Jewish Press Centrist American Jewish Committee Rejects the Iran Deal

Does Chuck Schumer know he's Jewish?

Schumer to Oppose Iran Nuclear Accord in Setback for Obama

An attack of conscious for Chuckie Schumer sweetie or maybe he just figures Obama will be gone in 15 months no need to kiss ass anymore

Senator Chuck Schumer, an influential New York Democrat, said he will oppose the Iran nuclear agreement, a setback for President Barack Obama’s effort to ensure the deal survives a review by U.S. lawmakers.

Declaring his break with the president after weeks of silence, Schumer said he favored preserving U.S. sanctions on Iran and resuming negotiations to obtain a tougher accord that guarantees the Islamic Republic won’t obtain a nuclear weapon.

“I will vote to disapprove the agreement, not because I believe war is a viable or desirable option, nor to challenge the path of diplomacy,” Schumer said in a statement Thursday night. “Iran will not change, and under this agreement it will be able to achieve its dual goals of eliminating sanctions while ultimately retaining its nuclear and non-nuclear power.”
.”

Schumer to Oppose Iran Nuclear Accord in Setback for Obama - Bloomberg Politics