Jewish Supremacy From the Jordan River to the Sea

Created and left behind.
The biggest mistake in US history?

The Iraq We Left Behind

"Nine years after U.S. troops toppled Saddam Hussein and just a few months after the last U.S. soldier left Iraq, the country has become something close to a failed state.

"Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki presides over a system rife with corruption and brutality, in which political leaders use security forces and militias to repress enemies and intimidate the general population.

"The law exists as a weapon to be wielded against rivals and to hide the misdeeds of allies.

"The dream of an Iraq governed by elected leaders answerable to the people is rapidly fading away."
1617406075723.jpeg

Capitalism strikes again.
 
Created and left behind.
The biggest mistake in US history?

The Iraq We Left Behind

"Nine years after U.S. troops toppled Saddam Hussein and just a few months after the last U.S. soldier left Iraq, the country has become something close to a failed state.

"Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki presides over a system rife with corruption and brutality, in which political leaders use security forces and militias to repress enemies and intimidate the general population.

"The law exists as a weapon to be wielded against rivals and to hide the misdeeds of allies.

"The dream of an Iraq governed by elected leaders answerable to the people is rapidly fading away."
View attachment 475544
Capitalism strikes again.
The whole thing was bull shit from the beginning. It's never been about anything other than the oil, its manipulation, its ownership, and the way it is bartered. All that about tyranny, democracy, weapons, domestic atrocities, and what-have-you is all black flag stuff. So, "US mistake" with regards Irak's leadership and Democracy? Bull crappy. The US doesn't give a shit about any of that stuff unless it gives them the appearance of an excuse to keep their thumbs in the pie.
 
Carter undermined and undercut that Shaw at every turn. Same shit he did to Pinochet. Same shit he did to Somoza.
Why do you think "undermining" dictators is a bad thing?

How did Carter "undermine" Somoza?


Teaching Nicaragua a Lesson, by Noam Chomsky (Excerpted from What Uncle Sam Really Wants)

"The Carter administration flew Guard commanders out of the country in planes with Red Cross markings (a war crime), and began to reconstitute the Guard on Nicaragua’s borders.

"They also used Argentina as a proxy.

"(At that time, Argentina was under the rule of neo-Nazi generals, but they took a little time off from torturing and murdering their own population to help reestablish the Guard-soon to be re named the contras, or 'freedom fighters.')"
 
The Jewish military is certainly “worthy of Mordor “
Mordor means murder.
By that standard the IDF is certainly worthy.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordor#First_World_War's_Western_Front

"First World War's Western Front[edit]

"Tolkien stated that his trench warfare experience with his regiment, the Lancashire Fusiliers, on the Western Front influenced his account of the landscape around Mordor.[8]..."

"Jane Ciabattari, writing on the BBC culture website, calls the hobbits' struggle to take the ring to Mordor 'a cracked mirror reflection of the young soldiers caught in the blasted landscape and slaughter of trench warfare on the Western Front.'[8]

"In one of his letters in 1960, Tolkien himself wrote that 'The Dead Marshes [just north of Mordor] and the approaches to the Morannon [an entrance to Mordor] owe something to northern France after the Battle of the Somme'.[8]"
 
Carter undermined and undercut that Shaw at every turn. Same shit he did to Pinochet. Same shit he did to Somoza.
Why do you think "undermining" dictators is a bad thing?

How did Carter "undermine" Somoza?


Teaching Nicaragua a Lesson, by Noam Chomsky (Excerpted from What Uncle Sam Really Wants)

"The Carter administration flew Guard commanders out of the country in planes with Red Cross markings (a war crime), and began to reconstitute the Guard on Nicaragua’s borders.

"They also used Argentina as a proxy.

"(At that time, Argentina was under the rule of neo-Nazi generals, but they took a little time off from torturing and murdering their own population to help reestablish the Guard-soon to be re named the contras, or 'freedom fighters.')"

You still cry yourself to sleep because Reagan won the Cold War, don't you?
 
...
And Arabs occupy 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999% of the land in the region and are still murdering each other, yet that fact never seems to bother the Jew haters.

Liar, you know full well that 100% of the land should be occupied by natives, so then is 100% Arab Muslims.
Arabs never invaded anyone, and are some of the most ancient, civilized, and peaceful people.
When people read about the Muslim threat to Europe around 1200 AD, that was sequential waves of the Mongols, Moghuls, and Turks from Asia, not the Mideast.
It was not Arab Muslims.

And I am Jewish, so watch your tongue.
I’m Jewish. I say Let him speak. Why? You’re insane. That is why Rigby.

Calling people who tell the truth, "Jew haters" is against board rules, is lying, illegal slander, and just plain rude.
He was essentially saying the Palestinians should give up their ancestral homes of thousands of years because they could do live in Egypt or Lebanon.
Well that makes no sense, and like telling the Jews to go back to Poland, which would make more sense.
The claim Jews are not safe in Europe is the obvious lie now.
It is just that if they go to Palestine, they get free land that actually belongs to Arabs and was stolen from them.
I know because as a Jew they offered me a free home as well.
they get free land that actually belongs to Arabs

The land was paid for with money and blood.

Wrong.
Jews do not legally own any land in Israel.
Look at the 1947 map and you see all Arab village names.
Look at a 1957 map and you see all the massacre sites renamed with Jewish names.
Like Dier Yassin.
Rigby, enough of this. Americans don’t own any land either I guess since Native Americans were here first. Same for South Americans as they eradicated the Aztecs, Mayans and Incas. Same for Islamists in Turkey who took Constantinople. Conquest is part of our history. Will you please get off your soap box and stop acting like such a tool?
 
RE: Jewish Supremacy From the Jordan River to the Sea
SUBTOPIC: Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War
⁜→ georgephillip, daveman, GLASNOST, et al,

BLUF: These issues are very often entangled in a mix of propaganda, accusatory inferences, and criminal claims.
(Even today, the battle cry of many activists of all types is "war crimes.") This is just one of many issues buried in Customary and International Humanitarian Laws and the associated Rules.

I'd really like to see that photo uncropped. Because the soldier is NOT pointing his weapon at the woman.
How many civilians have US weapons KILLED in Iraq?
Who's counting?
(COMMENT)

In the news today, the country most accused of "War Crimes" is the State of Israel, then a distant second place is → America. The manipulation of the media, and the conjuring of the media itself, is one aspect of broad brush strokes that are difficult to answer because the accusations are so lacking in content and specifics that make a defense is near impossible.

And a good example of the crime by innuendo is the one presented right here by our friend "georgephillip:"
How many civilians have US weapons KILLED in Iraq? ••• It is like asking how many B-40 Style RPGs have been (and still are being) used around the world?

Even though there are many accusations that your instinct is to immediately jump up on the soapbox at the ready and in the defense • you simply cannot do it without the various hostile advocates inflicting more damage on you than you can on them. You have to wait for them to make a critical mistake.


I admire "GLASNOST's" comment (Who's counting?)... Of course, no one is actually counting at all. They are all estimates.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
But what is important here is to understand that its application (from the River to the Sea) in the context of "apartheid" is pure propaganda. The application is targeting those readers who do not known any better and think, just because Israel has a border that separates the Israelis from the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it must be "apartheid." Intellectually it is a stupid contention. Every country in the world has its borders. And each of those countries has its rules on how to legally enter the country.
"From the River to the sea" is an accurate description of all the land under the legal (and illegal) control of the Jewish state.

For more than a century and particularly since 1948 the Jews of Israel have been stealing the homes, businesses, farms, factories, and bank accounts of non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

If that isn't apartheid, what is it?

800.jpeg

Leading human rights group calls Israel an 'apartheid' state

"JERUSALEM (AP) — A leading Israeli human rights group has begun describing both Israel and its control of the Palestinian territories as a single “apartheid” regime, using an explosive term that the country’s leaders and their supporters vehemently reject.

"In a report released Tuesday, B’Tselem says that while Palestinians live under different forms of Israeli control in the occupied West Bank, blockaded Gaza, annexed east Jerusalem and within Israel itself, they have fewer rights than Jews in the entire area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River."

"'One of the key points in our analysis is that this is a single geopolitical area ruled by one government,' said B’Tselem director Hagai El-Ad. 'This is not democracy plus occupation. This is apartheid between the river and the sea.”'"
 
But what is important here is to understand that its application (from the River to the Sea) in the context of "apartheid" is pure propaganda. The application is targeting those readers who do not known any better and think, just because Israel has a border that separates the Israelis from the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, it must be "apartheid." Intellectually it is a stupid contention. Every country in the world has its borders. And each of those countries has its rules on how to legally enter the country.
"From the River to the sea" is an accurate description of all the land under the legal (and illegal) control of the Jewish state.

For more than a century and particularly since 1948 the Jews of Israel have been stealing the homes, businesses, farms, factories, and bank accounts of non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

If that isn't apartheid, what is it?

800.jpeg

Leading human rights group calls Israel an 'apartheid' state

"JERUSALEM (AP) — A leading Israeli human rights group has begun describing both Israel and its control of the Palestinian territories as a single “apartheid” regime, using an explosive term that the country’s leaders and their supporters vehemently reject.

"In a report released Tuesday, B’Tselem says that while Palestinians live under different forms of Israeli control in the occupied West Bank, blockaded Gaza, annexed east Jerusalem and within Israel itself, they have fewer rights than Jews in the entire area between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River."

"'One of the key points in our analysis is that this is a single geopolitical area ruled by one government,' said B’Tselem director Hagai El-Ad. 'This is not democracy plus occupation. This is apartheid between the river and the sea.”'"

For more than a century and particularly since 1948 the Jews of Israel have been stealing the homes, businesses, farms, factories, and bank accounts of non-Jews living between the River and the sea.

When did Ottoman land belong to palestinians?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top