Jesse Ventura Confronts the 09/11 Commission

:rolleyes:


The hurd mentality is strong in here.

If you believe an alternative theory, you hold the same concerns as the "twoofers". The NIST report failed miserably and any other plausible scenario shold be investigated by a new open and independent investigation.

And who would conduct this new open and independent investigation?
 
:rolleyes:


The hurd mentality is strong in here.

If you believe an alternative theory, you hold the same concerns as the "twoofers". The NIST report failed miserably and any other plausible scenario shold be investigated by a new open and independent investigation.
I'd agree with you, if not for the fact that you twoofers do not have by any stretch of the imagination a "plausible":Definition of PLAUSIBLE
1: superficially fair, reasonable, or valuable but often specious <a plausible pretext>
2: superficially pleasing or persuasive <a swindler&#8230; , then a quack, then a smooth, plausible gentleman &#8212; R. W. Emerson>
3: appearing worthy of belief <the argument was both powerful and plausible>
&#8212; plau·si·ble·ness noun
&#8212; plau·si·bly \-bl&#275;\ adverb
See plausible defined for English-language learners »
See plausible defined for kids »
Examples of PLAUSIBLE
<it's a plausible explanation for the demise of that prehistoric species>
I watch the ospreys who nest on Perch Island high atop their white spruce. Our sense of a plausible summer depends much on their diligent success at nest-building and procreation, and on their chicks fledging in late August. &#8212;Richard Ford, Wall Street Journal, SCENARIO

YOU ALSO DON'T UNDERSTAND :Definition of INDEPENDENT
1: not dependent: as a (1) : not subject to control by others : self-governing (2) : not affiliated with a larger controlling unit <an independent bookstore> b (1) : not requiring or relying on something else : not contingent <an independent conclusion> (2) : not looking to others for one's opinions or for guidance in conduct (3) : not bound by or committed to a political party c OR GROUP (1) : not requiring or relying on others (as for care or livelihood) <independent of her parents> (2) : being enough to free one from the necessity of working for a living <a person of independent means> d : showing a desire for freedom <an independent manner> e (1) : not determined by or capable of being deduced or derived from or expressed in terms of members (as axioms or equations) of the set under consideration; especially : having linear independence <an independent set of vectors> (2) : having the property that the joint probability (as of events or samples) or the joint probability density function (as of random variables) equals the product of the probabilities or probability density functions of separate occurrence.INVESTIGATION.
 
Conservative said:
Jesse Ventura is a liar and a moron. NAVY SEAL my left gonad.
Im sorry to have to step on your toes but Jesse Ventura IS TRYING TO BE A TRUTH ADVOCATE like we all are! (Well some of us)
bullshit! Jesse Ventura is washed up performer trying to jump start a dead career like most performers he'll do and say anything to stay in the biz.

So if he will say "anything" it will be easy for you to contradict his assertions. But you have not and can not do so.

.
 
Im sorry to have to step on your toes but Jesse Ventura IS TRYING TO BE A TRUTH ADVOCATE like we all are! (Well some of us)
bullshit! Jesse Ventura is washed up performer trying to jump start a dead career like most performers he'll do and say anything to stay in the biz.

So if he will say "anything" it will be easy for you to contradict his assertions. But you have not and can not do so.

.

Several of us can and have.

It's not our fault you refuse to read or comprehend the valid responses put forth by numerous USMB members in this silly thread.
 
Im sorry to have to step on your toes but Jesse Ventura IS TRYING TO BE A TRUTH ADVOCATE like we all are! (Well some of us)
bullshit! Jesse Ventura is washed up performer trying to jump start a dead career like most performers he'll do and say anything to stay in the biz.

So if he will say "anything" it will be easy for you to contradict his assertions. But you have not and can not do so.

.
(cue buzzer)THANKS FOR PLAYING!
I have on many occasions refuted the "body's" allegations.
it is not necessary to refute them one at a time, As all of the 911 truth based speculation is specious and erroneous...
AKA based-on a false premise.
not fact based.
clear enough?
"belief, the currency of the delusional "!
 
I like how people claim they made a valid response.. as their response
have on many occasions refuted the "body's" allegations.
it is not necessary to refute them one at a time, As all of the 911 truth based speculation is specious and erroneous...
AKA based-on a false premise.
not fact based.
clear enough?
"belief, the currency of the delusional "!
__________________
 
:rolleyes:

You've been shown empirical evidence over and over enough to respond to situations as 'anomaly'. Then continue to dispute it as if the official account accurately depicts the events.
All the while insulting those who have surpassed your obvious level of understanding, flailing around with "jargon" to try and deter. Not the newest train wreck I've seen, but certainly one most avoid.

:clap2:
 
:rolleyes:

You've been shown empirical evidence over and over enough to respond to situations as 'anomaly'. Then continue to dispute it as if the official account accurately depicts the events.
All the while insulting those who have surpassed your obvious level of understanding, flailing around with "jargon" to try and deter. Not the newest train wreck I've seen, but certainly one most avoid.

:clap2:
I love the phrase "empirical evidence". Usually used by those that have NOT provided said evidence.
 
:rolleyes:

You've been shown empirical evidence over and over enough to respond to situations as 'anomaly'. Then continue to dispute it as if the official account accurately depicts the events.
All the while insulting those who have surpassed your obvious level of understanding, flailing around with "jargon" to try and deter. Not the newest train wreck I've seen, but certainly one most avoid.

:clap2:

so very true.:clap2:
 
:rolleyes:

You've been shown empirical evidence over and over enough to respond to situations as 'anomaly'. Then continue to dispute it as if the official account accurately depicts the events.
All the while insulting those who have surpassed your obvious level of understanding, flailing around with "jargon" to try and deter. Not the newest train wreck I've seen, but certainly one most avoid.

:clap2:
the failing of jargon is yours!
as to"empirical evidence" you have none:Empirical research is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience. Empirical evidence (the record of one's direct observations or experiences) can be analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively. Through quantifying the evidence or making sense of it in qualitative form, a researcher can answer empirical questions, which should be clearly defined and answerable with the evidence collected (usually called data). Research design varies by field and by the question being investigated. Many researchers combine qualitative and quantitative forms of analysis to better answer questions which cannot be studied in laboratory settings, particularly in the social sciences and in education.

In some fields, quantitative research may begin with a research question (e.g., "Does listening to vocal music during learning a word list have an effect on later memory for these words?") which is tested through experimentation in a lab. Usually, a researcher has a certain theory regarding the topic under investigation. Based on this theory some statements, or hypotheses, will be proposed (e.g., "Listening to vocal music has a negative effect on learning a word list."). From these hypotheses predictions about specific events are derived (e.g., "People who study a word list while listening to vocal music will remember fewer words on a later memory test than people who study a word list in silence."). These predictions can then be tested with a suitable experiment. Depending on the outcomes of the experiment, the theory on which the hypotheses and predictions were based will be supported or not.[1]
 
Last edited:
Osama's CIA Handler called on OBL to attack Americans

319204_179381755469208_126894987384552_388174_366815345_n.jpg
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrGxzsxSqMk]Unsecured Coins Quickie - Jesse Ventura - YouTube[/ame]
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top