JD Vance on free speech

[Marener]

I've made my positions clear, your retorts are the usual "nuh uh" blather.

Your position is nonsensical, as I've pointed out.

 

[FA_Q2]

You're speaking in contradictory nonsense. You're saying a campaign contribution is now their decision to NOT do something. You're also saying CBS is making a campaign contribution with speech that isn't even theirs.

None of this makes any fucking sense.

Silly Marener, you think the actions matter

The logic is really easy to follow:
Blue - illegal
Red - legal

It is sad that this is what has become of our electoral system.

 

[martybegan]

Your position is nonsensical, as I've pointed out.

You just don't like it.

 

[FA_Q2]

I don't have to defend anything, most normal people on this board know you are a fucking mouthbreathing idiot.

Your only allies are your equally lame socks.

ROFLMAO.

He called it and you did it anyway. FUCKING HILARIOUS.

 

[martybegan]

ROFLMAO.

He called it and you did it anyway. FUCKING HILARIOUS.

Ok there SJW white knight cuck.

 

[FA_Q2]

False claim from a retars.

Then again, we weren’t expecting honesty from a rancid twat.

It is true.

And the sad part is that you are all to ignorant to even understand why.

You truly are pathetic.

 

[Marener]

You just don't like it.

Because it’s an attack on freedom of speech and journalism. True. I don’t like people who attempt to attack our constitutional rights.

 

[martybegan]

Because it’s an attack on freedom of speech and journalism. True. I don’t like people who attempt to attack our constitutional rights.

But Germans arresting people for having naughty opinions, A-OK.
Suing or firing people due to misappropriating harassment laws for using the wrong pronoun, A-OK
Cancelling speakers at public universities, A-OK

 

[Marener]

But Germans arresting people for having naughty opinions, A-OK.
Suing or firing people due to misappropriating harassment laws for using the wrong pronoun, A-OK
Cancelling speakers at public universities, A-OK

What does this have to do with your accepting the president attacking our constitutional rights? I think he swore an oath to defend them.

 

[martybegan]

What does this have to do with your accepting the president attacking our constitutional rights? I think he swore an oath to defend them.

It's all the same fight.

 

[BackAgain]

It is true.

And the sad part is that you are all to ignorant to even understand why.

You truly are pathetic.

Sure peewee. Sure.

 

[Marener]

It's all the same fight.

You're defending speech you like and attacking speech you don't like.

You're not doing what you claim.

 

[Donald H]

It's no big deal, the people of Germany are not allowed to be holocaust deniers and Vance has a problem with that.

 

[22lcidw]

It's no big deal, the people of Germany are not allowed to be holocaust deniers and Vance has a problem with that.

It's the left-wing Jewish men and women of power who are anti-Israel today that makes that statement you made a possibility. Explain it to me. There is no one doing it. There is violence going on in our nation and the left-wing Jews do not care. To die for this.

 

[martybegan]

You're defending speech you like and attacking speech you don't like.

You're not doing what you claim.

Not so. I am critiquing a partisan deliberate action by supposed independent media to help a presidential candidate.

 

[Marener]

Not so. I am critiquing a partisan deliberate action by supposed independent media to help a presidential candidate.

Ha! You were just arguing it was criminal. Now it’s just a critique.

Fuck, Marty. You’re getting so much worse at this.

 

[martybegan]

Ha! You were just arguing it was criminal. Now it’s just a critique.

Fuck, Marty. You’re getting so much worse at this.

I have never said it was Criminal, I have referred to it as a campaign donation violation.

Vance implied it could be criminal.

 

[Marener]

I have never said it was Criminal, I have referred to it as a campaign donation violation.

Vance implied it could be criminal.

Campaign finance law is criminal, dope. Musk said it is criminal. Trump’s lawsuit is 100% bankers.

You are all over the map.

 

[martybegan]

Campaign finance law is criminal, dope. Musk said it is criminal. Trump’s lawsuit is 100% bankers.

You are all over the map.

It's civil as well.

Pro-Stacey Abrams groups fined $300,000 after admitting they broke Georgia campaign finance law

The Georgia Ethics Commission voted unanimously on Wednesday to fine two advocacy groups that were founded by Democrat Stacey Abrams and led by Raphael Warnock before voters elected him to the U.S. Senate.

A commission can't adjudicate criminal charges.

 

[Marener]

It's civil as well.

Pro-Stacey Abrams groups fined $300,000 after admitting they broke Georgia campaign finance law



A commission can't adjudicate criminal charges.

Civil, criminal. All able to be adjudicated with legal penalties.

That’s a far cry from a “critique”, which is what your argument is reduced to. That’s how far you’ve retreated.