Jaws Drop As Jeff Sessions All But Admits That Trump Obstructed Justice

[2aguy]

Why would Sessions refuse to answer when asked if he knows if trump obstructed justice?

Your answer: Hillary
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Well, what could the moron do BUT go back to what Hannity tells him to say?.....
"When cornered, ALWAYS mention Hillary".............LOL

The only ones cornered are left wing women alone with democrat males.....

You skeered to answer my question????
Which was the same question Adam Schiff asked Sessions.

The executive branch doesn't answer to the legislative branch nimrod........any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

 

[Reasonable]

It is so easy to say NO,

He doesn't answer the question because he knows he is as guilty as his russian lie and he doesn't want to keep digging.

Actually you're trying to put words in his mouth...you only assume the worst.
That's the problem with this issue, it takes evidence to build a case....not a lousy attitude toward the target.

why did Sessions REFUSE to answer a simple question about Trump obstructing Justice?
I know..you need to first hear what Hannity says.

 

[Reasonable]

Why would Sessions refuse to answer when asked if he knows if trump obstructed justice?

Your answer: Hillary
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Well, what could the moron do BUT go back to what Hannity tells him to say?.....
"When cornered, ALWAYS mention Hillary".............LOL

The only ones cornered are left wing women alone with democrat males.....

You skeered to answer my question????
Which was the same question Adam Schiff asked Sessions.

The executive branch doesn't answer to the legislative branch nimrod........any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

So Sessions can invoke executive privilege?
In what country?
I see you’re starting to sweat.

 

[ScienceRocks]

If he is going to use executive privilege in a simple yes or no question then he is acting guilty.

 

[Reasonable]

Why would Sessions refuse to answer when asked if he knows if trump obstructed justice?

Your answer: Hillary
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Well, what could the moron do BUT go back to what Hannity tells him to say?.....
"When cornered, ALWAYS mention Hillary".............LOL

The only ones cornered are left wing women alone with democrat males.....

You skeered to answer my question????
Which was the same question Adam Schiff asked Sessions.

The executive branch doesn't answer to the legislative branch nimrod........any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

Worst answer ever!

 

[nat4900]

it....tom foley is a democrat....larry craig didn't lock women in their office or force them to remain still, and quiet while they jerked off into a plant.....that is what you left wingers think as consensual sex....

Well, you know I meant MARK Foley........Tom Foley has long been dead.....But, nice try at diversion, you know full well who I meant.....any relation to mark?

WOW....very descriptive on the rest of your post.....did you get a "tingle" when you typed it?

 

[2aguy]

Why would Sessions refuse to answer when asked if he knows if trump obstructed justice?

Your answer: Hillary
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Well, what could the moron do BUT go back to what Hannity tells him to say?.....
"When cornered, ALWAYS mention Hillary".............LOL

The only ones cornered are left wing women alone with democrat males.....

You skeered to answer my question????
Which was the same question Adam Schiff asked Sessions.

The executive branch doesn't answer to the legislative branch nimrod........any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

Worst answer ever!

Yes....the truth is the worst answer to you guys. Like a cross to a vampire, you shield your eyes......the House can't ask the executive branch about Presidential business........that is how the system was set up...

 

[nat4900]

.any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

Oh, is that what happened with Nixon's tapes????

 

[2aguy]

.any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

Oh, is that what happened with Nixon's tapes????

He gave them up, he didn't have to......hilary learned that lesson and used Bleach Bit to destroy her evidence.....

 

[nat4900]

He gave them up, he didn't have to......hilary learned that lesson and used Bleach Bit to destroy her evidence....

Fantastic.....you brought out Hillary again.......When things get REALLY bad when cornered, however, please also mention Obama......

 

[MACAULAY]

Sessions said the same thing in an open hearing in the House about two weeks ago.

The whole nation was watching.

What he said was....just as Holder said about conversions with Obama....that he was not going to discuss any of his conversations with the President....they were confidential.

Thomas Jefferson's Attorney General would have said the same thing.

This headline is nothing more than an example of how Democrat/Bolsheviks lie. They take the smallest grain of truth, and build such a superstructure of Bull Shit over it---that Lie and Liars are the only proper descriptions.

 

[nat4900]

What he said was....just as Holder said about conversions with Obama....that he was not going to discuss any of his conversations with the President....they were confidential.

Thomas Jefferson's Attorney General would have said the same thing.

The difference, however, my incensed friend, is that the Trump-Sessions conversation was about COLLUSION with a hostile, foreign power.....and although collusion may not be a culpable crime, it is HIGHLY unethical.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Jaws Drop As Jeff Sessions All But Admits That Trump Obstructed Justice
By Jason Easley at Politicus USA

Jaws Drop As Jeff Sessions All But Admits That Trump Obstructed Justice

"SNIP..........

When asked by the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) if Trump ever directed him to hinder the Russia investigation, Attorney General Jeff Sessions refused to answer the question.

Manu Raju of CNN reported:


Manu Raju
✔
@mkraju
Schiff says he asked Sessions directly if Trump ever directed him to "hinder" the Russia investigation. He declined to answer, citing private conversations with Trump
1:07 PM - Nov 30, 2017
401 401 Replies 2,296 2,296 Retweets 3,708 3,708 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

Schiff’s question is easy to answer if the answer is no. The only reason for Attorney General Session to decline to answer is that any answer that he could provide would damage Trump. Anyone who has watched Jeff Sessions testify since he became Attorney General knows that the refusal to answer due to the privacy of the conversation is one of his favorite go-to moves when he is trying to avoid providing damaging information to the Russia investigation.

If the answer was no, all Sessions had to do was say no, and it would help boost the President’s claims that he did not obstruct justice. The Attorney General’s refusal to answer was an answer itself. There have been media reports for months that Trump wanted to fire Sessions because he wouldn’t interfere and make the Russia investigation go away.

.........SNIP"

Traitors all.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We know that Sessions is out to usurp the US citizens and local to state govt. by trying to find a way to destroy medical marijuana and legal marijuana with a law to increase the prosecuting power of the DEA and the Justice dept...

Regardless of what Sessions is out to do, he has now made it clear that he doesnt think he needs Donald Trump to do it. This represents a very clear case of Sessions not willing to put it on the line for Trump.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

We know that Sessions is out to usurp the US citizens and local to state govt. by trying to find a way to destroy medical marijuana and legal marijuana with a law to increase the prosecuting power of the DEA and the Justice dept...

Nice deflection! Now, how about back to the topic?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why would Sessions refuse to answer when asked if he knows if trump obstructed justice?

Your answer: Hillary
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Well, what could the moron do BUT go back to what Hannity tells him to say?.....
"When cornered, ALWAYS mention Hillary".............LOL

The only ones cornered are left wing women alone with democrat males.....

You skeered to answer my question????
Which was the same question Adam Schiff asked Sessions.

The executive branch doesn't answer to the legislative branch nimrod........any conversation with the President is covered by executive priviledge....twit....

Which is only true if the Presidemt specifically asserted executive priveilege for the conversation in question, which he did not. So maybe slow your roll, there, punchy

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If he is going to use executive privilege in a simple yes or no question then he is acting guilty.

You do not and never have grasped the concept that no one can know what is said between POTUS and his advisors. SCOTUS has ruled on that all the way back to Nixon.

 

[nat4900]

Regardless of what Sessions is out to do, he has now made it clear that he doesnt think he needs Donald Trump to do it. This represents a very clear case of Sessions not willing to put it on the line for Trump.

Ironically, Trump NEEDS Sessions to stick around.......It is expected that a hlaf dozen cabinet member will soon quit this administration......you know, to spend more time with their families.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

that no one can know what is said between POTUS and his advisors

Only if the president has asserted executive privilege over the specific material, from what I understand. And then Congress could still get this information via subpoena, if they meet certain criteria through their arguments to a judge.

 

[nat4900]

You do not and never have grasped the concept that no one can know what is said between POTUS and his advisors. SCOTUS has ruled on that all the way back to Nixon.

Wrong........Check the Nixon tapes judgment..... In July 1974, the Supreme Court rejected Nixon's claim of executive privilege and ordered him to turn over the remaining tapes.....