January 6 Committee Downgrades Secret Service Story from Seizing the Wheel to ‘Heated Discussion’

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
22,753
44,327
2,290
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.



The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.

The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.

Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.

Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”

Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.


 
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.


The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.
The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.
Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.
Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”
Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.



Brietbart is not a good source. But, let's say that it's accurate It's a sad thing when a Sitting President is so much out of control that we would believe almost anything negative about him.
 
Brietbart is not a good source. But, let's say that it's accurate It's a sad thing when a Sitting President is so much out of control that we would believe almost anything negative about him.

Worked so well with the Steele dossier, right?
 
Brietbart is not a good source. But, let's say that it's accurate It's a sad thing when a Sitting President is so much out of control that we would believe almost anything negative about him.
Sold to you, nightly by anti-Trump media.
 
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.



The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.

The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.

Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.

Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”

Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.



You must know by now that Trump overacts and exaggerates.
 
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.


The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.
The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.
Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.
Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”
Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.


Lol, Democrats just make ya laugh.

The problem is, Lefties live on dreams, forget reality, dreams it is. So when they hear things, that's that magnify their dream, then it's all systems go, and after the investigation progresses, nothingburgers result.
 
Lol, Democrats just make ya laugh.

The problem is, Lefties live on dreams, forget reality, dreams it is. So when they hear things, that's that magnify their dream, then it's all systems go, and after the investigation progresses, nothingburgers result.

Hutchinson repeated what she was told. Trump overacts and exaggerates. He had some sort of tantrum.
 
Brietbart is not a good source. But, let's say that it's accurate It's a sad thing when a Sitting President is so much out of control that we would believe almost anything negative about him.
Who was feeding you falsehoods about him on a daily basis that you are unable to separate fact from fiction?
 
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.


The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.
The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.
Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.
Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”
Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.



What a bunch of liar drama queens.
 
Third party information, only 'legally' acceptable for use in a dem J6 committee.
Since it's not a trial then it's perfectly legal. If rump doesn't want it out in the open he has a constitutional right to get a restraining order against it. She had a constitutional right to express it unless there is a court order saying she can't say it. Now under the Federal AG, in order to say anything, she must put her little hand on the bible and say the magic words. Then if what she says in incorrect then she can be held liable for it by the court. The Jan6 thing is just a rodeo. The real thing is under the AG.
 
Oops!

The show trial isn't going so well, particularly for those of you who will believe anything about Trump they feed you that is negative or casts him in a bad light.


The January 6 Committee’s eighth public hearing Thursday produced testimony that there was a “heated discussion” between then-President Donald Trump and the Secret Service during the Capitol riot — not that Trump tried to seize the wheel of the presidential vehicle.
The testimony was a significant step back from claims last month by former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson — based on hearsay — that Trump had tried to wrest control of the vehicle from the Secret Service.
Hutchinson’s claimed were immediately disputed by the Secret Service agents she named, Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-VA) cited Ornato claiming in an earlier interview that Trump had been “irate.” She did not mention Hutchinson’s claims.
Rep. Luria then cited another witness, retired D.C. Metro Police Sergeant Mark Robinson, who was not in the vehicle with Trump but was in the motorcade. Sgt. Robinson — who could only offer hearsay evidence — said on video that he heard that the president was “upset” and that there had been a “heated argument or discussion about going to the Capitol.”
Though Robinson, like all witnesses brought forth by the committee after months of closed-door depositions, was cited as a witness against Trump, his testimony actually contradicted Hutchinson’s testimony and undermined the hearing’s credibility.


Are you joking with this?! Is this really news to you??
 
Since it's not a trial then it's perfectly legal. If rump doesn't want it out in the open he has a constitutional right to get a restraining order against it. She had a constitutional right to express it unless there is a court order saying she can't say it. Now under the Federal AG, in order to say anything, she must put her little hand on the bible and say the magic words. Then if what she says in incorrect then she can be held liable for it by the court. The Jan6 thing is just a rodeo. The real thing is under the AG.
It is an 'investigation' which has to adhere to evidentiary standards and protocols, or it is a partisan (which it is) fishing expedition.

No matter how you attempt to justify it, it is 'hearsay' evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top