January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Text Message Between Meadows And

[Clipper]

clean about what? the text was doctored he correct the lying demafascist

Sure it was. Feel better now, fool?

 

[daveman]

Nope.

Jordan, Meadows, and Trump were trying to overthrow the duly elected government. That is a fact and that is what matters far more than an erroneous attribution.

You tards are being led around by the nose.

What you call facts are Democrat fantasies you're been told to believe...so you do. Without question.

 

[struth]

Sure it was. Feel better now, fool?

no it makes me sad that we have demafascist doing this…it’s a threat to our republic because it makes a mockery out of congress

 

[WEATHER53]

Kinda hard to assassinate people without any weapons. Were you afraid the Shaman was going to gore people with his horn hat?

Government would be ground to a halt due to horn hat
Lib 101

 

[daveman]

Falsifying evidence is a good reason. Schiff should be in prison. Why do you people have to fake your "evidence" if it's so clear there was an "insurrection"?

Fake evidence, fake racist hate crimes...

Reality simply doesn't support leftist claims.

 

[MisterBeale]

Prosecute Schiff over a period?

Then you woke up.

He did more than just add a period. He took out an "em slash" and also a text portion.

This was the full text, vs. what Schiff displayed;

“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,”

 

[daveman]

My side is resisting or opposing what America is becoming. It make no difference to me whether you think that supporting the D's or the R's.

Your side is encouraging the fascism you hysterically claimed Trump was bring to America.

You're okay with the boot on the neck as long as it's the left boot.

 

[Nostra]

Prosecute Schiff over a period?

Then you woke up.

It’s not just a period, and it is tampering with evidence.

 

[Nostra]

Schiff did nothing wrong. But he did manage you trigger you Trump asseaters into a feeding frenzy over a period.

You have nothing, never had anything & never will. Your puppy love for Trump has ruined you nutjobs for life.

Get therapy before it's too late.

Clipper approves of tampering with evidence.

 

[daveman]

The committee released a statement admitting that Schiff was in error, Clown.

So now you're unhinged, crying in your beer because the committe will continue it's work.

Schiff's lies served their purpose.

You believed them.

 

[Nostra]

What was "doctored"?

Read the thread, Moron.

 

[daveman]

Schiff is a proven liar.

The Useful Idiots will believe him without question.

Man, I sure was right, huh?

 

[daveman]

Government would be ground to a halt due to horn hat
Lib 101

AOC was afraid for her life even though she was in a different building.

FEAR THE HORN HAT

 

[Doc7505]

The House January 6 committee admitted on Wednesday that it doctored a text message from Jim Jordan to Mark Meadows, as was first reported by The Federalist.
DECEMBER 15, 2021 By Sean Davis
Following reporting by The Federalist that Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his staff doctored a text message between Rep. Jim Jordan and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, the House Jan. 6 committee admitted over email that it did, in fact, doctor the text message.
As The Federalist reported on Wednesday morning, on Jan. 5, 2021, Jordan forwarded to Meadows a three-paragraph legal summary from attorney Joseph Schmitz, summarizing a four-page legal memorandum Schmitz had written regarding congressional certification of the 2020 presidential electoral vote count.

In a statement provided to The Federalist via email, a Democrat spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee confessed that the committee doctored the text message.
“The Select Committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from ‘a lawmaker’ to Mr. Meadows,” the spokesman wrote. “The graphic read, ‘On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.’”
“In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,” the spokesman admitted. “The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.”
The Jan. 6 committee spokesman did not explain how one could “inadvertently” cut a sentence in half and eliminate the final two paragraphs of a detailed legal summary, nor did he explain why Schiff attributed the content of the text to Jordan, “a lawmaker,” rather than to Schmitz, the attorney who wrote it.
As The Federalist reported on Wednesday morning, the original Jan. 5 text to Jordan was written by Washington attorney and former Department of Defense Inspector General Joseph Schmitz and included an attachment of a four-page draft Word document drafted by Schmitz that detailed Schmitz’s legal reasoning for suggesting that Pence had the constitutional authority to object to the certification of electoral votes submitted by a handful of states. The piece that Schmitz had sent to Jordan was published at the website everylegal.vote the next morning and even included the same “DISCUSSION DRAFT” heading and timestamp as the document that Schmitz sent to Jordan.
In his statement, Schiff erased the final two paragraphs and the final clause of the first paragraph of the text message before inserting punctuation that was never there, all without disclosing what he was doing. The graphic displayed by Schiff, which was doctored to look like an exact screenshot, was similarly doctored, as it contained content that was never in the original message and eliminated content that was.
“Good luck tomorrow!” Schmitz texted Jordan on the evening of Jan. 5, including the Word document as an attachment. Schmitz then texted to Jordan a three-paragraph summary of his Word document, which Schiff sliced and diced and then attributed to Jordan.
The Jan. 6 committee has been roundly criticized for refusing to allow any Republicans appointed by House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., to sit on the committee. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., banned McCarthy from appointing any Republican members and instead hand-picked her own troops to run the chamber’s inquisition. According to a source familiar with the matter, Schiff never bothered to contact Jordan to ask about the text or confirm its contents, authorship, and veracity.
Multiple lawmakers contacted by The Federalist mocked Schiff for peddling an obviously doctored text, and said anyone even remotely familiar with Jordan would know that he was forwarding an analysis without comment given that he rarely, if ever, sends texts that span more than a word or two.
“That’s just not Jim’s style,” one lawmaker close to Jordan told The Federalist. “Long, nerdy paragraphs might be my style, but that’s not Jim’s style at all.”
“Plus, you have to remember what was going on at that time,” the lawmaker noted. “People were sending around these law review articles and debates left and right because we had an interest in learning the facts and getting them right. And if it’s somehow seditious in this country to debate or share a law review article on Alexander Hamilton’s view on things, that’s not really a country I want to be a part of anymore.”
Another lawmaker close to Jordan laughed out loud when asked if Jordan would ever write out his own lengthy legal analyses via text.
“If he texts at all, it’s usually something like ‘yes’ or ‘call me,’” that colleague said.
“The idea that Jordan would sit down and punch out a long-winded legal argument via text is absurd,” one individual who regularly talks to Jordan told The Federalist. “That’s just not how he works.”

BREAKING: J6 Committee Admits It Doctored Text Between Jordan And Meadows

The House Jan. 6 committee admitted on Wednesday that it doctored a text message from Jim Jordan to Mark Meadows, as was first reported by The Federalist.

thefederalist.com

~~~~~~
It looks like not only Schitf and Raskin have been caught doctoring evidence at the Select Committee for January 6th, Liz Cheney took a shot at it too.

Treason: Jan. 6 committee admits it doctored a text message in Democrat Rep. Schiff’s presentation

The January 6 "select" committee was forced to admit Schiff doctored a text message between former Trump WH chief of staff Mark Meadows and Ohio congressman Jim Jordan (R)

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

**********​

CONFIRMED: January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Republican Text Message in Adam Schiff's Presentation

The January 6 committee admitted it had doctored a text message cited by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to hold Mark Meadows in contempt.

www.breitbart.com

**********​

Jan. 6 Committee Cooks Up Another Misleading Text To Demonize GOP Colleagues – Real News Aggregator

realnewsaggregator.com

 

[daveman]

~~~~~~
It looks like not only Schitf and Raskin have been caught doctoring evidence at the Select Committee for January 6th, Liz Cheney took a shot at it too.

Treason: Jan. 6 committee admits it doctored a text message in Democrat Rep. Schiff’s presentation

The January 6 "select" committee was forced to admit Schiff doctored a text message between former Trump WH chief of staff Mark Meadows and Ohio congressman Jim Jordan (R)

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

**********​

CONFIRMED: January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Republican Text Message in Adam Schiff's Presentation

The January 6 committee admitted it had doctored a text message cited by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to hold Mark Meadows in contempt.

www.breitbart.com

**********​

Jan. 6 Committee Cooks Up Another Misleading Text To Demonize GOP Colleagues – Real News Aggregator

realnewsaggregator.com

Hey, Democrats:

If you have to lie to make your point, your point isn't worth making.

 

[struth]

~~~~~~
It looks like not only Schitf and Raskin have been caught doctoring evidence at the Select Committee for January 6th, Liz Cheney took a shot at it too.

Treason: Jan. 6 committee admits it doctored a text message in Democrat Rep. Schiff’s presentation

The January 6 "select" committee was forced to admit Schiff doctored a text message between former Trump WH chief of staff Mark Meadows and Ohio congressman Jim Jordan (R)

www.lawenforcementtoday.com

**********​

CONFIRMED: January 6 Committee Admits It Doctored Republican Text Message in Adam Schiff's Presentation

The January 6 committee admitted it had doctored a text message cited by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to hold Mark Meadows in contempt.

www.breitbart.com

**********​

Jan. 6 Committee Cooks Up Another Misleading Text To Demonize GOP Colleagues – Real News Aggregator

realnewsaggregator.com

the 1/6 Committee isn’t even pretending to be legit at this point

 

[Turtlesoup]

Well it is the federalist but it's also the OP. Yesterday, as Cheney dismantled Jordan's claim that executive privilege was being "shredded," Jordan didn't disclaim sending his email. But now he apparently says the email was "doctored" to make it look like Jordan was telling Meadows to have Pence overturn the election, when Jordan was actually only forwarding an email from some lawyer saying Pence could do it. LOL

But that isn't the point. The point was Jordan was saying "tell Trump to stop the RIOT in the capitol"

Pelosi could have stopped the riot by locking the door---but instead she encouraged it. Why blame trump when the FBI/CIA alphabets had their members implanted to instigate it.

 

[AntonToo]

Using doctored quotes to make their case isn't credible.

How were they doctored? Did you even read?

 

[hadit]

How were they doctored? Did you even read?

I read the OP, did you?

In a statement provided to The Federalist via email, a Democrat spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee confessed that the committee doctored the text message.
“The Select Committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from ‘a lawmaker’ to Mr. Meadows,” the spokesman wrote. “The graphic read, ‘On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.’”
“In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,” the spokesman admitted. “The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.”
The Jan. 6 committee spokesman did not explain how one could “inadvertently” cut a sentence in half and eliminate the final two paragraphs of a detailed legal summary, nor did he explain why Schiff attributed the content of the text to Jordan, “a lawmaker,” rather than to Schmitz, the attorney who wrote it.

Cutting off a statement, making it look like it was complete and falsely attributing it is doctoring.

 

[AntonToo]

I read the OP, did you?

In a statement provided to The Federalist via email, a Democrat spokesman for the Jan. 6 committee confessed that the committee doctored the text message.
“The Select Committee on Monday created and provided Representative Schiff a graphic to use during the business meeting quoting from a text message from ‘a lawmaker’ to Mr. Meadows,” the spokesman wrote. “The graphic read, ‘On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.’”
“In the graphic, the period at the end of that sentence was added inadvertently,” the spokesman admitted. “The Select Committee is responsible for and regrets the error.”
The Jan. 6 committee spokesman did not explain how one could “inadvertently” cut a sentence in half and eliminate the final two paragraphs of a detailed legal summary, nor did he explain why Schiff attributed the content of the text to Jordan, “a lawmaker,” rather than to Schmitz, the attorney who wrote it.

Cutting off a statement, making it look like it was complete and falsely attributing it is doctoring.

Oh ok, so

"On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all" - is the CORRECT partial statement about getting Mike Pence to unilaterally reject the result of the election. Right?

How does the rest of it change the meaning of the first half of the quote? Did something get taken out of context?