James O'Keefe Strikes Again: Mail in ballots in Colorado.

[mdk]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

O'Keefe isn't being held to a higher standard, at least by me he isn't. I hold him and all the others in journalism to the exact same standard. Maybe others do not but I can't speak for them or anyone else. He doesn't get a pass anymore then NBC's editing of Zimmerman's tapes. This shouldn't be about politics, or the usual my side vs. your side type jazz, this should about journalistic integrity and honesty . O'Keefe has shown on numerous occasion that he is not interested in neither and therefore should not be trusted.

I do agree though, our media as consistently failed to do it's job over and over again because they are more interested in turning a profit.

 

[martybegan]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

O'Keefe isn't being held to a higher standard, at least by me he isn't. I hold him and all the others in journalism to the exact same standard. Maybe others do not but I can't speak for them or anyone else. He doesn't get a pass anymore then NBC's editing of Zimmerman's tapes. This shouldn't be about politics, or the usual my side vs. your side type jazz, this should about journalistic integrity and honesty . O'Keefe has shown on numerous occasion that he is not interested in neither and therefore should not be trusted.

I do agree though, our media as consistently failed to do it's job over and over again because they are more interested in turning a profit.

That IS holding him to a higher standard. Yes, he's biased, at least he admits it, and the people who agree with him admit it too. he's a political operative exposing the shenanigans of the other side.

A large majority of Journalists hold left wing sympathies and leanings. The biggest lie isn't from O'Keefe, its from all the others claiming impartiality when that is clearly not the case.

Investigative journalism is messy, and if there were actual, complete fabrications made by him, proving them would be easy peasy. What you have instead is nuanced responses to what he is presenting, along the lines of "well we really meant this" or "he edited out some mitigating conditions", which are matters of opinion, not matters of truth and untruth.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

Everyone does it so its okay that O'Keefe does it?

The question is, why do you believe him when you know that everything else he has said has been a lie? How many more times will you be taken in by his lies?

 

[martybegan]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

Everyone does it so its okay that O'Keefe does it?

The question is, why do you believe him when you know that everything else he has said has been a lie? How many more times will you be taken in by his lies?

His methods involve lying to those he is duping, its called investigative undercover journalism. You are attacking the "how" and not the "what"

 

[bravoactual]

Looks like some people think unused mail in ballots really need to be sent in, even if you are not the person it was sent to.

New James O 8217 Keefe video Lefty organizers in Colorado wouldn 8217 t support voter fraud on Mark Udall 8217 s behalf would they Hot Air

Watch for the part of the clip where one organizer advises O’Keefe and crew to visit “ghetto Aurora” if they’re looking for discarded mail-in ballots to collect and cast illegally on behalf of their owners. Lots of black and Latino voters there simply throw their ballots away, she assures him; you’ll find a nice haul of blank ones if you’re willing to pick through a little trash.

Did you know, incidentally, that some lefties there recognized him and realized they were being stung? Not all did, as you’ll soon see in gory detail, but a few. (O’Keefe himself mentions it later in the video.) Some progressive groups were sufficiently nervous about what might turn up in this clip that they went running to Mother Jones this past weekend to note that not all of them condone voter fraud, with MJ claiming at least two instances where organizers rejected Team O’Keefe’s proposals for some sort of illegal shenanigans. Here’s my favorite part, though:

O'Keefe is a known liar.

UPDATED The Lies Of James O Keefe Research Media Matters for America

You of course choose to believe the lies.

Figures.

You would rather believe the lies.

You use the term liar and mediamatters in the same sentence? LOL.

He is going undercover as an investigative reporter. the use of a cover implies a level of falsehood. The videos speak for themselves.

And your side bitching about video/audio or any editing is laughable on its face. Remember the Zimmerman 911 tape?

Face it, you cant attack the base of his results, so you go after the methods. Its sad and pathetic.

Media Matters is telling the truth about O'Keefe. You would rather believe the lies of O'Keefe than accept the truth about O'Keefe.

I can and I do attack his results. O'Keefe IS A LIAR.

There is no reason, based on his prior actions to believe that O'Keefe is in any way, shape and or form telling the truth.

O'Keefe traffics in edited tapes and fraudulent action. O'Keefe would rather lie (which is what YOU would rather believe) than tell the truth.

Media Matters is telling the truth, a truth YOU do not want to hear or read because for you believing the LIES Of O'KEEFE is so much easier.

You know O'Keefe is a liar and you do not care that O'Keefe is a LIAR.

You would RATHER BELIEVE A LIAR THAN ACCEPT THE TRUTH.

 

[bravoactual]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

Everyone does it so its okay that O'Keefe does it?

The question is, why do you believe him when you know that everything else he has said has been a lie? How many more times will you be taken in by his lies?

His methods involve lying to those he is duping, its called investigative undercover journalism. You are attacking the "how" and not the "what"

His methods involve LYING, CHEATING and EDITING THE TRUTH TO FIT HIS NARRATIVE.

 

[bravoactual]

Conservative Provocateur Creates Fake LGBT Group To ‘Expose’ Voter Fraud

by Zack Ford Posted on October 21, 2014 at 9:13 am



James O’Keefe, perhaps best known as the undercover pimp who targeted the community organizing group ACORN, has once again been trying to target Democratic candidates with undercover schemes, this time in Colorado. Last week, he and two collaborators tried to bait field staffers working on the reelection campaign for Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) into approving voter fraud using Colorado’s new vote-by-mail system.


This year will be the first time Colorado voters have the opportunity to vote in a general election by mail. All registered voters will receive a ballot in the mail that they simply fill out and return. On several occasions, O’Keefe and his collaborators approached Udall campaign staffers to suggest that they fill out these ballots for other people.


In one case, a man visited a Democratic field office in Boulder hoping to volunteer for the campaign. Identifying himself with an LGBT activist student group called Rocky Mountain Vote Pride, the individual suggested that he could fill out mail-in ballots for other college students who had moved away but still received mail on campus. Though he was turned away, he came back another time, bringing along a friend he introduced as a “civics professor” from the University of Colorado-Boulder who also served as the faculty adviser for Rocky Mountain Vote Pride. Staffers later confirmed that the “professor” was, in fact, O’Keefe himself, matching his appearance to a photo O’Keefe tweeted of himself in disguise as a “45 yo” with a mustache.


Rocky Mountain Vote Pride does not seem to be a real group. It has a basic website and Facebook page, neither of which contains any contact information. The website suggests it’s a student group dedicated to advancing “voter participation and equality in America,” listing some basic polling on marriage equality, without citation.


O’Keefe’s Project Veritas would not confirm to Mother Jones any “operations in Colorado,” but spokesman Stephen Gordon said to “watch for our upcoming videos.”


Recently, O’Keefe tried to expose Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) as secretly supporting same-sex marriage — he’s one of the only Democrats in the Senate who doesn’t. In 2010, O’Keefe and his mentor applied for same-sex marriage licenses in Massachusetts, telling clerks they were straight and just wanted insurance coverage, seemingly just to prove that they could.

Its called investigative reporting, and kudos to the people that turned him away (or at least recognized him). However that doesn't answer the question about the people that DID say it was OK to go out, collect unused ballots and cast them.

It is NOT investigative reporting to engage in outright lies...ala Acorn.

 

[martybegan]

Looks like some people think unused mail in ballots really need to be sent in, even if you are not the person it was sent to.

New James O 8217 Keefe video Lefty organizers in Colorado wouldn 8217 t support voter fraud on Mark Udall 8217 s behalf would they Hot Air

Watch for the part of the clip where one organizer advises O’Keefe and crew to visit “ghetto Aurora” if they’re looking for discarded mail-in ballots to collect and cast illegally on behalf of their owners. Lots of black and Latino voters there simply throw their ballots away, she assures him; you’ll find a nice haul of blank ones if you’re willing to pick through a little trash.

Did you know, incidentally, that some lefties there recognized him and realized they were being stung? Not all did, as you’ll soon see in gory detail, but a few. (O’Keefe himself mentions it later in the video.) Some progressive groups were sufficiently nervous about what might turn up in this clip that they went running to Mother Jones this past weekend to note that not all of them condone voter fraud, with MJ claiming at least two instances where organizers rejected Team O’Keefe’s proposals for some sort of illegal shenanigans. Here’s my favorite part, though:

O'Keefe is a known liar.

UPDATED The Lies Of James O Keefe Research Media Matters for America

You of course choose to believe the lies.

Figures.

You would rather believe the lies.

You use the term liar and mediamatters in the same sentence? LOL.

He is going undercover as an investigative reporter. the use of a cover implies a level of falsehood. The videos speak for themselves.

And your side bitching about video/audio or any editing is laughable on its face. Remember the Zimmerman 911 tape?

Face it, you cant attack the base of his results, so you go after the methods. Its sad and pathetic.

Media Matters is telling the truth about O'Keefe. You would rather believe the lies of O'Keefe than accept the truth about O'Keefe.

I can and I do attack his results. O'Keefe IS A LIAR.

There is no reason, based on his prior actions to believe that O'Keefe is in any way, shape and or form telling the truth.

O'Keefe traffics in edited tapes and fraudulent action. O'Keefe would rather lie (which is what YOU would rather believe) than tell the truth.

Media Matters is telling the truth, a truth YOU do not want to hear or read because for you believing the LIES Of O'KEEFE is so much easier.

You know O'Keefe is a liar and you do not care that O'Keefe is a LIAR.

You would RATHER BELIEVE A LIAR THAN ACCEPT THE TRUTH.

All that typing, a not a single thing to back any of your shit up.

Yes, he lies to the people he is secretly interviewing to get them to admit to stuff. Yes, he edits his tapes, but considering people talk about what isn't edited, I guess the unedited ones are available, aren't they?

From the NPR interview:

In a March 2011 interview with O'Keefe, NPR journalist Bob Garfield described the ACORN scam:

"So let's just recap for a moment the ACORN scenario. You lie to get into – the offices. You lie, subsequently, about the lie you told to get into the offices. You edit the pimp shot into the trailer to create the illusion that you were somehow wearing it during your sting. You go on television wearing the same pimp outfit and let interviewers observe, uncorrected, that that’s what you were wearing when you confronted the ACORN employees. If your journalistic technique is the lie, why should we believe anything you have to say?"[105]

O'Keefe responded:

"Investigative reporters have used, you know, quote, unquote, "false pretenses" like To Catch a Predator, ABC’s Primetime Live. Even Mike Wallace at 60 Minutes went undercover. You go undercover in order to get to the truth. Now, is it lying? It’s a form of guerrilla theater. You’re posing as something you’re not, in order to capture candid conversations from your subject. But I wouldn't characterize it as, as lying."[105]​

Again, you can prove lying under the "how" category, but not under the "what" Your real issue is with the" why".​

 

[martybegan]

Conservative Provocateur Creates Fake LGBT Group To ‘Expose’ Voter Fraud

by Zack Ford Posted on October 21, 2014 at 9:13 am



James O’Keefe, perhaps best known as the undercover pimp who targeted the community organizing group ACORN, has once again been trying to target Democratic candidates with undercover schemes, this time in Colorado. Last week, he and two collaborators tried to bait field staffers working on the reelection campaign for Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) into approving voter fraud using Colorado’s new vote-by-mail system.


This year will be the first time Colorado voters have the opportunity to vote in a general election by mail. All registered voters will receive a ballot in the mail that they simply fill out and return. On several occasions, O’Keefe and his collaborators approached Udall campaign staffers to suggest that they fill out these ballots for other people.


In one case, a man visited a Democratic field office in Boulder hoping to volunteer for the campaign. Identifying himself with an LGBT activist student group called Rocky Mountain Vote Pride, the individual suggested that he could fill out mail-in ballots for other college students who had moved away but still received mail on campus. Though he was turned away, he came back another time, bringing along a friend he introduced as a “civics professor” from the University of Colorado-Boulder who also served as the faculty adviser for Rocky Mountain Vote Pride. Staffers later confirmed that the “professor” was, in fact, O’Keefe himself, matching his appearance to a photo O’Keefe tweeted of himself in disguise as a “45 yo” with a mustache.


Rocky Mountain Vote Pride does not seem to be a real group. It has a basic website and Facebook page, neither of which contains any contact information. The website suggests it’s a student group dedicated to advancing “voter participation and equality in America,” listing some basic polling on marriage equality, without citation.


O’Keefe’s Project Veritas would not confirm to Mother Jones any “operations in Colorado,” but spokesman Stephen Gordon said to “watch for our upcoming videos.”


Recently, O’Keefe tried to expose Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) as secretly supporting same-sex marriage — he’s one of the only Democrats in the Senate who doesn’t. In 2010, O’Keefe and his mentor applied for same-sex marriage licenses in Massachusetts, telling clerks they were straight and just wanted insurance coverage, seemingly just to prove that they could.

Its called investigative reporting, and kudos to the people that turned him away (or at least recognized him). However that doesn't answer the question about the people that DID say it was OK to go out, collect unused ballots and cast them.

It is NOT investigative reporting to engage in outright lies...ala Acorn.

So ACORN was doing NONE of the things shown in the Video?

 

[plant]

Voter fraud !! The great myth that lets republicans feel better , instead of the truth ..no one buys your guys Neanderthal point of views !! James O'keefe wow!!

 

[martybegan]

I am not sure how anyone can believe O'Keefe at this point. I don't a crap what side of the aisle you reside on but his videos are edited and doctored in a way to fit his narrative and the narrative of his supporters. I would take everything he reports on with a very small grain of salt.

Everyone does that, why do you hold O'Keefe to a higher set of standards? Again, when people complain about his "lying" they refer to his methods, not the content. When they refer to his editing, they don't show complete disproving of what he is recording, they try to to "explain" what is actually happening.

Investigative reporting such as this is messy, ugly, and is needed. If only our mainstream media would do its job.

Everyone does it so its okay that O'Keefe does it?

The question is, why do you believe him when you know that everything else he has said has been a lie? How many more times will you be taken in by his lies?

His methods involve lying to those he is duping, its called investigative undercover journalism. You are attacking the "how" and not the "what"

His methods involve LYING, CHEATING and EDITING THE TRUTH TO FIT HIS NARRATIVE.

it's called getting a story. If it were used to get dirt on corporations you would be ALL FOR IT.

Your hypocrisy, like your tears, are delicious.

 

[bravoactual]

Anatomy of a James O'Keefe video

Okeefe: Do you love America?
Response: It is the greatest country in the world

After editing the off camera question

Okeefe: Do you love North Korea?
Response: It is the greatest country in the world

Why conservatives continue trying to sell the garbage put out by this propagandist is beyond me

So the woman in the Video IS NOT saying to go out, collect thrown out ballots, and cast them?

We do not know if the tape as provided by O'Keefe is not in fact edited to create a fiction, which is what O'Keefe is known to do.

We do not know if the tape as provided by O'Keefe is in fact the original. What we do not is O'Keefe is known to heavily edited tape (as stated by a court in California).

We do not know if O'Keefe is telling the truth because O'KEEFE IS A KNOWN LIAR.!!!!!

Unless or until such a time as O'Keefe can prove that in fact he has not once again edited his tape in order to tell a lie, it is incumbent you as the poster and I as a reader to take what a KNOWN LIAR like O'Keefe with more than one grain of salt.

 

[bravoactual]

Conservative Provocateur Creates Fake LGBT Group To ‘Expose’ Voter Fraud

by Zack Ford Posted on October 21, 2014 at 9:13 am



James O’Keefe, perhaps best known as the undercover pimp who targeted the community organizing group ACORN, has once again been trying to target Democratic candidates with undercover schemes, this time in Colorado. Last week, he and two collaborators tried to bait field staffers working on the reelection campaign for Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) into approving voter fraud using Colorado’s new vote-by-mail system.


This year will be the first time Colorado voters have the opportunity to vote in a general election by mail. All registered voters will receive a ballot in the mail that they simply fill out and return. On several occasions, O’Keefe and his collaborators approached Udall campaign staffers to suggest that they fill out these ballots for other people.


In one case, a man visited a Democratic field office in Boulder hoping to volunteer for the campaign. Identifying himself with an LGBT activist student group called Rocky Mountain Vote Pride, the individual suggested that he could fill out mail-in ballots for other college students who had moved away but still received mail on campus. Though he was turned away, he came back another time, bringing along a friend he introduced as a “civics professor” from the University of Colorado-Boulder who also served as the faculty adviser for Rocky Mountain Vote Pride. Staffers later confirmed that the “professor” was, in fact, O’Keefe himself, matching his appearance to a photo O’Keefe tweeted of himself in disguise as a “45 yo” with a mustache.


Rocky Mountain Vote Pride does not seem to be a real group. It has a basic website and Facebook page, neither of which contains any contact information. The website suggests it’s a student group dedicated to advancing “voter participation and equality in America,” listing some basic polling on marriage equality, without citation.


O’Keefe’s Project Veritas would not confirm to Mother Jones any “operations in Colorado,” but spokesman Stephen Gordon said to “watch for our upcoming videos.”


Recently, O’Keefe tried to expose Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) as secretly supporting same-sex marriage — he’s one of the only Democrats in the Senate who doesn’t. In 2010, O’Keefe and his mentor applied for same-sex marriage licenses in Massachusetts, telling clerks they were straight and just wanted insurance coverage, seemingly just to prove that they could.

Its called investigative reporting, and kudos to the people that turned him away (or at least recognized him). However that doesn't answer the question about the people that DID say it was OK to go out, collect unused ballots and cast them.

It is NOT investigative reporting to engage in outright lies...ala Acorn.

So ACORN was doing NONE of the things shown in the Video?

We do not know because O'Keefe "Heavily Edited" the tape. A court in California ruled against O'Keefe based on the edits made to the tape. IF O'Keefe can and is willing to provide the original, unedited tape then we will know what did and did not happen.

 

[Ravi]

Another creatively edited video. If the asshole wants to be credible he should release the entire video. But he never does.

 

[martybegan]

Another creatively edited video. If the asshole wants to be credible he should release the entire video. But he never does.

Just like Maher and Stewart do on their shows?

I forget editing is only bad when your opponents do it.

Fucking hypocrite.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You started another thread based on James O'Keefe?

^ Exposes Liberal Crimes on a daily basis

 

[martybegan]

Conservative Provocateur Creates Fake LGBT Group To ‘Expose’ Voter Fraud

by Zack Ford Posted on October 21, 2014 at 9:13 am



James O’Keefe, perhaps best known as the undercover pimp who targeted the community organizing group ACORN, has once again been trying to target Democratic candidates with undercover schemes, this time in Colorado. Last week, he and two collaborators tried to bait field staffers working on the reelection campaign for Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) into approving voter fraud using Colorado’s new vote-by-mail system.


This year will be the first time Colorado voters have the opportunity to vote in a general election by mail. All registered voters will receive a ballot in the mail that they simply fill out and return. On several occasions, O’Keefe and his collaborators approached Udall campaign staffers to suggest that they fill out these ballots for other people.


In one case, a man visited a Democratic field office in Boulder hoping to volunteer for the campaign. Identifying himself with an LGBT activist student group called Rocky Mountain Vote Pride, the individual suggested that he could fill out mail-in ballots for other college students who had moved away but still received mail on campus. Though he was turned away, he came back another time, bringing along a friend he introduced as a “civics professor” from the University of Colorado-Boulder who also served as the faculty adviser for Rocky Mountain Vote Pride. Staffers later confirmed that the “professor” was, in fact, O’Keefe himself, matching his appearance to a photo O’Keefe tweeted of himself in disguise as a “45 yo” with a mustache.


Rocky Mountain Vote Pride does not seem to be a real group. It has a basic website and Facebook page, neither of which contains any contact information. The website suggests it’s a student group dedicated to advancing “voter participation and equality in America,” listing some basic polling on marriage equality, without citation.


O’Keefe’s Project Veritas would not confirm to Mother Jones any “operations in Colorado,” but spokesman Stephen Gordon said to “watch for our upcoming videos.”


Recently, O’Keefe tried to expose Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) as secretly supporting same-sex marriage — he’s one of the only Democrats in the Senate who doesn’t. In 2010, O’Keefe and his mentor applied for same-sex marriage licenses in Massachusetts, telling clerks they were straight and just wanted insurance coverage, seemingly just to prove that they could.

Its called investigative reporting, and kudos to the people that turned him away (or at least recognized him). However that doesn't answer the question about the people that DID say it was OK to go out, collect unused ballots and cast them.

It is NOT investigative reporting to engage in outright lies...ala Acorn.

So ACORN was doing NONE of the things shown in the Video?

We do not know because O'Keefe "Heavily Edited" the tape. A court in California ruled against O'Keefe based on the edits made to the tape. IF O'Keefe can and is willing to provide the original, unedited tape then we will know what did and did not happen.

Link it, bitch.

 

[Ravi]

Another creatively edited video. If the asshole wants to be credible he should release the entire video. But he never does.

Just like Maher and Stewart do on their shows?

I forget editing is only bad when your opponents do it.

Fucking hypocrite.

Okeefe is a comedy show. That changes everything.

What a little baby you are.

 

[martybegan]

Anatomy of a James O'Keefe video

Okeefe: Do you love America?
Response: It is the greatest country in the world

After editing the off camera question

Okeefe: Do you love North Korea?
Response: It is the greatest country in the world

Why conservatives continue trying to sell the garbage put out by this propagandist is beyond me

So the woman in the Video IS NOT saying to go out, collect thrown out ballots, and cast them?

We do not know if the tape as provided by O'Keefe is not in fact edited to create a fiction, which is what O'Keefe is known to do.

We do not know if the tape as provided by O'Keefe is in fact the original. What we do not is O'Keefe is known to heavily edited tape (as stated by a court in California).

We do not know if O'Keefe is telling the truth because O'KEEFE IS A KNOWN LIAR.!!!!!

Unless or until such a time as O'Keefe can prove that in fact he has not once again edited his tape in order to tell a lie, it is incumbent you as the poster and I as a reader to take what a KNOWN LIAR like O'Keefe with more than one grain of salt.

Again, the only lies brought up were how he got access. You keep arguing the how and not the what.

 

[martybegan]

Another creatively edited video. If the asshole wants to be credible he should release the entire video. But he never does.

Just like Maher and Stewart do on their shows?

I forget editing is only bad when your opponents do it.

Fucking hypocrite.

Okeefe is a comedy show. That changes everything.

What a little baby you are.

A.k.a "Ravi has no response and crawls away with his tail between his legs like the twat he is"