Yet by only reading Madison do you know if the point is false, sounds like someone prefers to be ignorant.
The point is false on two grounds: one, Madison never said it. To use it as if he he said it is to imply a false authority and hints and clutching at straws and willing to accept a false statement in order to try to prove a point.
The second way in which it is false is that there is ample evidence that the constitution and our system of law were most certainly not based on Ten Commandment law or Biblical principles but rather on English Common Law.
I don't think so.
The oldest material in the Hebrew Bible, which would be the Old Testament is thought to date from the 13th century BC and the final form is thought to have been set between somewhere between the 1st century BC and the 4th century AD.
Prior to that, you have the Code of Hamurabi, which includes similar injunctions (along with their punishments) (1790BC); Code of Ur-Nammu, king of Ur (ca. 2050 BC) and some others.
No. You haven't but there have been plenty from the right on "Liberal/Marxists".
You need some sort of commandment in order to be polite though, incidently where did I state that you needed the ten commandments??? Than again how do you know you did not need the Ten Commandments,
You were born in a culture that obeyed, lived, prayed, memorized, and taught the Ten Commandments. You cannot say how you would behave if you grew up in a culture where the Ten Commandments did not exsist.
I did not say that quote.
On the last paragraph - some version of the "Ten Commandments" (or the Golden Rule) exists in almost every human society, independent of Judeo-Christian philosophy.