James ‘God Is Non-Binary’ Talarico Admits He’s a ‘Christian Who Hates Christianity’

[g5000]

How many times has Trump committed adultery? How many MAGA politicians have been caught committing adultery?

That used to matter to conservatives. Just the mere accusation of adultery was enough for a candidate to drop out of the race. Just the mere accusation of adultery was enough for a sitting Republican to be forced to resign immediately.

Every single moral issue has been surrendered by MAGAs.

Every. Last. One.

They even allowed a cross-dressing Republican who committed wire fraud, money laundering, and theft of public funds to continue to sit in the House while he was useful to them! Even after he was CONVICTED, they invited him back for the State of the Union!

So to see MAGAs whining about the moral fiber of a Democrat who is disgusted with their two-faced fake Christianity is about as hypocritical and vomit-inducing as it gets.

Unbelievable.

 

[g5000]

It's not a sin to eat shellfish or pork. if you really understood the Bible you'd know that. But you don't

I do know that, moron. Comprehension fail.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I do know that, moron. Comprehension fail.

No you didn't or you wouldn't have posted the nonsense, moron. Get over yourself already, lunatic

You lie like a rug

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It's not a sin to eat shellfish or pork. if you really understood the Bible you'd know that. But you don't

Sadly, yeah he doesn't.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

How many times has Trump committed adultery? How many MAGA politicians have been caught committing adultery?

That used to matter to conservatives. Just the mere accusation of adultery was enough for a candidate to drop out of the race. Just the mere accusation of adultery was enough for a sitting Republican to be forced to resign immediately.

Every single moral issue has been surrendered by MAGAs.

Every. Last. One.

They even allowed a cross-dressing Republican who committed wire fraud, money laundering, and theft of public funds to continue to sit in the House while he was useful to them! Even after he was CONVICTED, they invited him back for the State of the Union!

So to see MAGAs whining about the moral fiber of a Democrat who is disgusted with their two-faced fake Christianity is about as hypocritical and vomit-inducing as it gets.

Unbelievable.

Both sides are hypocrites, adulterers, murderers etc. When are you ever going to comprehend that. You're too busy condemning people. I thought Jesus came to save sinners....not the righteous.

 

[g5000]

No you didn't or you wouldn't have posted the nonsense, moron. Get over yourself already, lunatic

You lie like a rug

You are seriously stupid. I plainly stated the Bible calls eating pork and shellfish an abomination, just like homosexuality is.

IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

See for yourself, moron:

In fact, eating pork is called an "abomination" in the Old Testament just as homosexuality is.

I also explained that Jesus never mentions homosexuality.

Jesus barely touches on the subject of food. He makes an indirect reference to things taken into the body can't make you unclean.

Paul goes into much more detail about foods no longer being forbidden than Jesus does.


.

 

[Moonglow]

Jesus was not very fond of the Jews.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

You are seriously stupid. I plainly stated the Bible calls eating pork and shellfish an abomination, just like homosexuality is.

IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

See for yourself, moron:



I also explained that Jesus never mentions homosexuality.

Jesus barely touches on the subject of food. He makes an indirect reference to things taken into the body can't make you unclean.

Paul goes into much more detail about foods no longer being forbidden than Jesus does.


.

Idiot, it was Jesus who said it about clean and unclean food.

Mark 7:18-19

You're waaaaay out of your realm

 

[g5000]

Jesus was not very fond of the Jews.

Jesus loved the Jews. All 12 of his apostles were Jews.

Jesus was not fond of the hypocritical Pharisees.

 

[g5000]

Idiot, it was Jesus who said it about clean and unclean food.

Mark 7:18-19

You're waaaaay out of your realm

Again, comprehension fail.

I plainly said Jesus barely touched on the subject of food. Mark 7:18-19 is not where he starts.

Start with verse 14.

But that's it. That is the only place in the New Testament where Jesus overrode the Law's restrictions on food.

I also said Paul went into far more detail about food. The book of Romans. He leaves it to the consumer whether or not to eat meat, but asks if it offends someone then they should avoid eating it.

That's where the expression, "One man's meat is another man's poison" comes from.

Some of the early Christians were Jewish and still observed The Law, while some were Gentiles who did not follow The Law.

The Book of Romans is Paul's attempt to reconcile the two factions who were constantly bickering over these matters.

Trust me. You don't want to debate the Bible with me.

 

[Hollie]

With their fanatical support of Donald Trump, MAGAs surrendered the moral high ground a decade ago.

They willingly hacked off their moral legs. Gleefully. Joyfully.

No one is buying what they are selling in the spiritual realm any more.

Speaking of selling:

This is not the place for your Koran thumping attempts at conversion to islamism.

 

[Hollie]

So anyway...

If you listen to the full context of Talarico's "Christian who hates Christianity", what I have posted here is what he is talking about.

^^^^ Talarico groupie

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Again, comprehension fail.

I plainly said Jesus barely touched on the subject of food. Mark 7:18-19 is not where he starts.

Start with verse 14.

But that's it. That is the only place in the New Testament where Jesus overrode the Law's restrictions on food.

I also said Paul went into far more detail about food. The book of Romans. He leaves it to the consumer whether or not to eat meat, but asks if it offends someone then they should avoid eating it.

That's where the expression, "One man's meat is another man's poison" comes from.

Some of the early Christians were Jewish and still observed The Law, while some were Gentiles who did not follow The Law.

The Book of Romans is Paul's attempt to reconcile the two factions who were constantly bickering over these matters.

Trust me. You don't want to debate the Bible with me.

You're a novice frantically using Google and AI

 

[TemplarKormac]

It's not a sin to eat shellfish or pork. if you really understood the Bible you'd know that. But you don't

He doesn't understand that those restrictions were part of the Jewish Mosaic Law. And when Jesus died on the cross he paid the death penalty for everyone.

"I came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it."

Matthew 5:17

Furthermore, in Mark 7:18-19, Jesus does away with the food requirements:

“Are you so dull?” he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.”

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He doesn't understand that those restrictions were part of the Jewish Mosaic Law. And when Jesus died on the cross he paid the death penalty for everyone.

"I came not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it."

Matthew 5:17

Furthermore, in Mark 7:18-19, Jesus does away with the food requirements:

“Are you so dull?” he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.”

Part of the New Covenant.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You are seriously stupid. I plainly stated the Bible calls eating pork and shellfish an abomination, just like homosexuality is.

IN THE OLD TESTAMENT.

See for yourself, moron:

But where in the Bible does Jesus change his mind about Homosexuality? He doesn't. God's feelings about it remain unchanged. Since he and God are one, that means the view remains unchanged.

But in the book of Mark, Jesus plainly does away with the clean and unclean food thing.

You have to connect the dots.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Part of the New Covenant.

Yes ma'am.

 

[TemplarKormac]

This whole contradiction thing comes from people failing to connect the testaments properly.

The old law was the foundation for the new law and the new covenant.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Trust me. You don't want to debate the Bible with me.

“The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.”

-1 Corinthians 2:14

“The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ.”

-2 Corinthians 4:4

 

[g5000]

“The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.”

-1 Corinthians 2:14

That defines MAGAs to a T.