JAIL the Chicago Trump Rally Disruptors

[1stRambo]

Yo, you`re going to need to call Mayor Rahm Emanuel? Good luck with that, he works for the Socialist Party!!!

The cops can go ahead and make their arrests (hundreds). Then let Rahm come down and set them all free, if he thinks that little of Illinois law

Shall we impose the death penalty too?

Yo, looking Good?

"GTP"

 

[protectionist]

You can't jail them. They're not doing anything illegal or unconstitutional.

Unfortunately, they've learned how to use your freedoms against you. They'll find a legal way to shut down opposing speech because that's who they are.

Seems to me the best way to oppose a Trump rally is to record it replay it over and over. But these people would rather shut it down.

Sad to watch. They've found a legal way to spit in the face of freedom of expression, in my opinion our most precious right.
.

Are you reading comprehension deficient ? The OP clearly showed pure EVIDENCE of what that are doing ILLEGAL, and why yes you CAN jail them. Good grief! No they have NOT found a legal way. They are criminals committing crimes, who should be arrested. Period.

 

[protectionist]

Actually Trump doesn't NEED Armpit-Chicago or Illinois' delegates. He might just go ahead and scoop them up anyway though. Just to laugh at the brains bashing him.

And that's exactly what he just did last night. Swept all 24 Illinois delegates. All that protesting at UIC, FOR NOTHING.

They could have spent the time better staying home, watching Leave It To Beaver reruns.

 

[protectionist]

So why do you suppose he baited eleven thousand people into a venue and then stood them up and sent them into the street? So they could all enjoy a nice walk down Michigan Avenue?

The protestor imbeciles caused the cancellation, AS YOU KNOW.

 

[protectionist]

Trumpism, the slippery slope to fascism. Hold on, the ride will speed up with momentum.

We're already seeing the facism. Among the protestor-disruptor-silencer-attackers-fools.

 

[protectionist]

Agité? Moi? Perish the thought. I'm quite happy Rump's devious little scheme fell flatter than a bottle of Rump vodka falling from the window of a Rump Shuttle and landing on a Rump casino.

And again, good for those people in the area for not taking the bait, and good for the Chicago PD for handling what was put on them, which I have no doubt won lots and lots of Rump support among the police community.


How many deaths or injuries was he counting on? Who knows. All I know is he tried to make it happen and once again, FAILED.

And that's a good thing. Every time Rump fails ---- God creates a kitten.

Only ones failing are the stupid Trumps bashers >>

Illinois primary
Last updated Mar 16, 2016 at 2:16 AM ET
REPUBLICAN

Mar 1569 delegates
99% reporting Delegates Votes
Trump (won)
24 Delegates
38.9%
546,968
Cruz
0 Delegates
30.3%
426,928
Kasich
0 Delegates
19.7%
277,321
Rubio
0 Delegates
8.6%
121,517

Dropped out: Bush, Carson, Christie, Fiorina, Huckabee, Paul, Santorum

 

[EverCurious]

^^ I was laughing sooo hard that Trump won Ill by so much, then harder when Sanders lost it. At least we know where they /actually/ stand heh -- Rumor is Sander's supporters are claiming that Hillary paid protestors to wear Bernie shirts and disrupt the Trump rally in Chicago (I almost believe it, Hillary /is/ snake enough to do something like that.)


In other news, every once in a while Obama comes out and says something I agree with - Kudo's to the POTUS for shaming those who would attempt to shut down freedom of opinion and speech in this country.


Addition; also kudo's to Rubio for shaming his supporters boo's that someone else was voted in; his resignation speech was spot on in that regard. Power to the peeps.

 

[protectionist]

The protestors do not have "their own rally". They came to have a voice in the one that was relevant to them.

And again ----- no one in any security or police capacity suggested there were security concerns. Rump completely pulled that out of his own ass, for the purpose of trying to play the victim card

Oh no. No security concerns. And that's why the Chicago police ARRESTED 5 people ? Which there would have been many more if the mayor hadn't told the police to not arrest anyone.

Trump Calls off Chicago Rally as Supporters, Protesters Clash

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel told police not to arrest violent, anti-Trump rioters, cop sources say | BizPac Review

 

[protectionist]

"JAIL the Chicago Trump Rally Disruptors"

Further proof of the fear and contempt most on the right have for dissent and opposing points of view, and why Trump has no business being president.

Further proof of the deflection distortion MO of the left, to villify the victims of free speech suppression (Trump & supporters), while praising and excusing the perpetrator criminals.

 

[protectionist]

Once AGAIN -- this is ten times posting the same thing, which does not change, ever, because it's historical fact:

>> A spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department tells ABC7 Eyewitness News the Chicago Police Department did not talk to the Trump campaign or tell them to cancel the event, and that the first police heard was at 6:30 p.m. when they were notified by UIC and Secret Service that the event was canceled. <<​

Who da liar now, Beeyatch?

YOU ARE, Obviously. "spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department" HA HA HA. And their boss ? Rahm Emanuel. The same one who ordered them to stand down, and not arrest anyone.

 

[konradv]

"JAIL the Chicago Trump Rally Disruptors" Further proof of the fear and contempt most on the right have for dissent and opposing points of view, and why Trump has no business being president.

Further proof of the deflection distortion MO of the left, to vilify the victims of free speech suppression (Trump & supporters), while praising and excusing the perpetrator criminals.

What about the allegations that the worst of the "protesters" were Trump plants? Kind of suspicious that he'd try to blame Bernie Sanders of all people.

 

[Pogo]

So why do you suppose he baited eleven thousand people into a venue and then stood them up and sent them into the street? So they could all enjoy a nice walk down Michigan Avenue?

The protestor imbeciles caused the cancellation, AS YOU KNOW.

Actually I "know" no such thing, and neither do you. Here's the thing --- wishful revisionist thinking is not the same as "knowing".

What I actually DO know is what the security authorities have already reported, and which I've posted a dozen times to you Denialists. The corollary to the above rule is that simple Denialism doesn't make the factual history go away. Nothing can do that. You'll just have to accept it.

And you'll also have to come to grips that whatever wacko websites are feeding you this horseshit are lying to you, and that that's easily debunked. Not a position I'd want to be in.

The protestors do not have "their own rally". They came to have a voice in the one that was relevant to them.

And again ----- no one in any security or police capacity suggested there were security concerns. Rump completely pulled that out of his own ass, for the purpose of trying to play the victim card

Oh no. No security concerns. And that's why the Chicago police ARRESTED 5 people ? Which there would have been many more if the mayor hadn't told the police to not arrest anyone.

Trump Calls off Chicago Rally as Supporters, Protesters Clash

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel told police not to arrest violent, anti-Trump rioters, cop sources say | BizPac Review

Five arrests and a couple of minor injuries isn't anywhere near a security concern when you have tens of thousands of people in one spontaneous unorganized place. And that was after Rump released ten thousand unsatiated hordes into the streets all at once.

Obviously this one didn't generate the ROI he must have had in mind.

But he should be used to that by now, even if he does address them all with self-delusion.

 

[Pogo]

Once AGAIN -- this is ten times posting the same thing, which does not change, ever, because it's historical fact:

>> A spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department tells ABC7 Eyewitness News the Chicago Police Department did not talk to the Trump campaign or tell them to cancel the event, and that the first police heard was at 6:30 p.m. when they were notified by UIC and Secret Service that the event was canceled. <<​

Who da liar now, Beeyatch?

YOU ARE, Obviously. "spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department" HA HA HA. And their boss ? Rahm Emanuel. The same one who ordered them to stand down, and not arrest anyone.

Chicago PD and the other UIC security agencies were all under the jurisdiction of the Secret Service. That's who was in charge. Rahm Emmanuel can't overrule that.


Anything else?

 

[protectionist]

What about the allegations that the worst of the "protesters" were Trump plants? Kind of suspicious that he'd try to blame Bernie Sanders of all people.

What about them ? Allegations are nothing, without evidence to back them up. If anyone has any, let's hear it.

 

[protectionist]

Five arrests and a couple of minor injuries isn't anywhere near a security concern when you have tens of thousands of people in one spontaneous unorganized place. And that was after Rump released ten thousand unsatiated hordes into the streets all at once.

Obviously this one didn't generate the ROI he must have had in mind.

But he should be used to that by now, even if he does address them all with self-delusion.

The 5 arrests would/could have been 1005 if the mayor had not ordered the police to not make arrests.
And are we to supposed to have some idea of

you are yammering about ?

And the bottom line of it all is the pitiful idiots who thought they achieved something, achieved nothing as Trump trampled them in the Illinois primary which he won and took ALL 24 DELEGATES. The dum dums should have spent all that wasted energy learning to play a song on the guitar. What a waste.

 

[protectionist]

Chicago PD and the other UIC security agencies were all under the jurisdiction of the Secret Service. That's who was in charge. Rahm Emmanuel can't overrule that.

Anything else?

FALSE! (and stupid as well)

 

[Rambunctious]

Don't jail them...kick their fuckin asses next time.

 

[jc456]

"JAIL the Chicago Trump Rally Disruptors" Further proof of the fear and contempt most on the right have for dissent and opposing points of view, and why Trump has no business being president.

Further proof of the deflection distortion MO of the left, to vilify the victims of free speech suppression (Trump & supporters), while praising and excusing the perpetrator criminals.

What about the allegations that the worst of the "protesters" were Trump plants? Kind of suspicious that he'd try to blame Bernie Sanders of all people.

hahahahahhahahahahhahhaha when one is caught, blame the other side. That is a libturd way bar none.

 

[jc456]

Once AGAIN -- this is ten times posting the same thing, which does not change, ever, because it's historical fact:

>> A spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department tells ABC7 Eyewitness News the Chicago Police Department did not talk to the Trump campaign or tell them to cancel the event, and that the first police heard was at 6:30 p.m. when they were notified by UIC and Secret Service that the event was canceled. <<​

Who da liar now, Beeyatch?

YOU ARE, Obviously. "spokesperson for the Chicago Police Department" HA HA HA. And their boss ? Rahm Emanuel. The same one who ordered them to stand down, and not arrest anyone.

Chicago PD and the other UIC security agencies were all under the jurisdiction of the Secret Service. That's who was in charge. Rahm Emmanuel can't overrule that.


Anything else?

link!!

 

[jc456]

So why do you suppose he baited eleven thousand people into a venue and then stood them up and sent them into the street? So they could all enjoy a nice walk down Michigan Avenue?

The protestor imbeciles caused the cancellation, AS YOU KNOW.

Actually I "know" no such thing, and neither do you. Here's the thing --- wishful revisionist thinking is not the same as "knowing".

What I actually DO know is what the security authorities have already reported, and which I've posted a dozen times to you Denialists. The corollary to the above rule is that simple Denialism doesn't make the factual history go away. Nothing can do that. You'll just have to accept it.

And you'll also have to come to grips that whatever wacko websites are feeding you this horseshit are lying to you, and that that's easily debunked. Not a position I'd want to be in.

The protestors do not have "their own rally". They came to have a voice in the one that was relevant to them.

And again ----- no one in any security or police capacity suggested there were security concerns. Rump completely pulled that out of his own ass, for the purpose of trying to play the victim card

Oh no. No security concerns. And that's why the Chicago police ARRESTED 5 people ? Which there would have been many more if the mayor hadn't told the police to not arrest anyone.

Trump Calls off Chicago Rally as Supporters, Protesters Clash

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel told police not to arrest violent, anti-Trump rioters, cop sources say | BizPac Review

Five arrests and a couple of minor injuries isn't anywhere near a security concern when you have tens of thousands of people in one spontaneous unorganized place. And that was after Rump released ten thousand unsatiated hordes into the streets all at once.

Obviously this one didn't generate the ROI he must have had in mind.

But he should be used to that by now, even if he does address them all with self-delusion.

wow, the stupid that flows from your fingertips to the keyboard is amazing. WOW. you sure as hell have no idea how to lead a riot do you. you should stay away from rallies then. You shouldn't put in a resume for Bernie to send you out to the next trump event. See, if Trump actually wanted a riot, he wouldn't have canceled the event, or does that shit for brains you walk with tell you differently?