tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 9,745
- 5,698
- 928
NoCringeworthy watching Republicans make wild statements and then cut off Smith when he tried to respond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoCringeworthy watching Republicans make wild statements and then cut off Smith when he tried to respond
Hur explains this in his report. Perhaps you should have read it.Democrats can't explain why they prosecuted Trump and blessed Biden for the same thing, having records at his home.
Look, a crime is a crime. To prosecute Trump and allow Biden off for the same thing can't be explained.Hur explains this in his report. Perhaps you should have read it.
He also conflates topics and smashes everything together to confuse his low information voters. When Smith tries to pick apart his confusing mess of a statement, he leans back and goes "ho ho ho, look at you trying to parse what I said, that's so stupid".Jordan presents opinions as fact and then cuts off Smith when he tries to respond
It can be explained to people who will listen because the facts, circumstances and evidence are far different.Look, a crime is a crime. To prosecute Trump and allow Biden off for the same thing can't be explained.
Who the **** says "catsup"?![]()
Opinion | Jack Smith’s testimony raises a jarring question about the country
Andrew Warren:www.ms.now
Really, it was like shooting fish in a barrel! The Trump Cult Committee members knew full well that Trump was watching the proceedings. And, they tried unsuccessfully to make it look like that Jack was waging a personal vendetta against Trump. But, like the highly skilled prosecutor he is, he took them apart, quietly without grandstanding as the Cult members were doing.
It was painful to watch as Jordan and his cohorts got chopped up by Jack. Trump was most likely coloring his walls red with his big Mac and catsup bottle! Bigly!!!
"There's not a class you can go to,
There's not a pill you can take,
Stupid is forever!"
Ron White
It can be explained to people who will listen because the facts, circumstances and evidence are far different.
You mean like trump had top secret documents in his home from the time he was president, and Biden had top secret documents in his home, his garage, and his car, dating back to when he was a senator?It can be explained to people who will listen because the facts, circumstances and evidence are far different.
Did you forget all the charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice charges against Trump? That was different.You mean like trump had top secret documents in his home from the time he was president, and Biden had top secret documents in his home, his garage, and his car, dating back to when he was a senator?
you're right, totally different.
Biden had NO REASON for those documents to be in his possession.
deflecting from 'facts'?Did you forget all the charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice charges against Trump? That was different.
But they didn’t commit the same crime because Biden didn’t obstruct justice, tamper with witnesses and attempt to destroy evidence.deflecting from 'facts'?
I pointed out that the 2 of them committed the same crime, different results. Why don't you address that?
more ******* deflection.But they didn’t commit the same crime because Biden didn’t obstruct justice, tamper with witnesses and attempt to destroy evidence.
Trump did.
It's not a deflection. Decisions to prosecute are made in the full context of the situation. Since Trump decided to commit numerous additional crimes while trying to hide his documents from the government, he was more likely to be prosecuted.more ******* deflection.
Did they both have top secret documents in their homes?
were they treated the same?
Can you answer that question without deflecting to your own pet peeve?
I am not the sole person you refuse to listen to. There was no need, not a tiny need, to prosecute Trump.It can be explained to people who will listen because the facts, circumstances and evidence are far different.
Yet the Government returned to Trump his documents they prosecuted, wait, tried to prosecute him for.It's not a deflection. Decisions to prosecute are made in the full context of the situation. Since Trump decided to commit numerous additional crimes while trying to hide his documents from the government, he was more likely to be prosecuted.
People who do the same thing should be treated the same. Biden and Trump didn't do the same thing.
If Trump had done what Biden did, by cooperating with the investigation and turning over all the documents when asked, he probably wouldn't have been prosecuted.
I for one ask for you to provide proof. Charges are simply charges. Smith dismissed his own case. This folly was enacted by Democrat Merrick Garland to try to put Trump into prison. Trump faced this from day one thanks to Obama directing that the intelligence agents charge that Trump was elected soley because Russia worked with Trump to elect President Trump, and that was a proven lie.Did you forget all the charges of witness tampering and obstruction of justice charges against Trump? That was different.
Read the indictment which includes evidence to be used in the prosecution. Didn’t you read it?I for one ask for you to provide proof. Charges are simply charges. Smith dismissed his own case. This folly was enacted by Democrat Merrick Garland to try to put Trump into prison. Trump faced this from day one thanks to Obama directing that the intelligence agents charge that Trump was elected soley because Russia worked with Trump to elect President Trump, and that was a proven lie.
The indictment he asked to be dismissed?Read the indictment which includes evidence to be used in the prosecution. Didn’t you read it?
Yes.The indictment he asked to be dismissed?
Consider what you would claim were Pam Bondi to get Biden indicted for keeping top secret documents in his garage, not for months, but for years.Yes.