It's Trump's trial. What Hillary, or anybody else did doesn't matter.

[iamwhatiseem]

It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,

Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.


The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.


Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.


In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.


It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.

Wow - the lengths you will go to convince yourself.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Servers, stupid.

Cloth.....Servers............make up your mind.
Hannity could have brought tapes from his show, that would have convinced them.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Point and laugh at how you got suckered by a con man?

WW

Trotsky laughed too......

 

[mak2]

.




Oh, LOOKY HERE!

Eight out of ten people on this board realize that this post is full of shit.

We just keep wondering when you are going to give up and find a friendlier place to spend your days.





.

Every single forum I have ever been on that develops a Trump following the Trumpsters attempt and usually succeed in running off every one else who might have a different opinion. I was wondering if it would happen here.

 

[Smokin' OP]

No prosecutor would take this case up against Hillary. (QUOTE is foggy)

Point is Comey used his PERSONAL JUDGMENT not the law when deciding to file charges or not. She CLEARLY broke the law.

ALL prosecutors, lawyers, and judges use personal judgement when deciding a case.

Trump Chose the Attorney Who Offered Hunter Biden Plea ...​

Newsweek
https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Department of Justice
18 hours ago — However, U.S. Attorney David Weiss, who offered the agreement to Hunter Biden, was appointed to that position by Trump. Weiss, the U.S. attorney ...

Then there is this "Personal "JUDGEMENT".

Trump vows to go after 'entire Biden crime family' if ...​

Anadolu Agency
https://www.aa.com.tr › americas › trump-vows-to-go-...
7 days ago — "I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States of America, Joe Biden, ...

 

[Smokin' OP]

Every single forum I have ever been on that develops a Trump following the Trumpsters attempt and usually succeed in running off every one else who might have a different opinion. I was wondering if it would happen here.

Teabaggers love their echo chamber.

 

[SweetSue92]

It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,

Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.


The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.


Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.


In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.


It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.

Gosh, all this spilled ink to convince us, all over the board.

Wouldn't work that way if you were winning. But you're not. And you know it.

 

[SweetSue92]

Teabaggers love their echo chamber.

"NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW"

The rest of us

 

[scruffy]

Every single forum I have ever been on that develops a Trump following the Trumpsters attempt and usually succeed in running off every one else who might have a different opinion. I was wondering if it would happen here.

No one's trying to run you off. You're a great source of entertainment. We'd rather have you here than on the streets stealing Nike's and rioting.


(Oh excuse me, I meant peacefully protesting)

 

[mak2]

No one's trying to run you off. You're a great source of entertainment. We'd rather have you here than on the streets stealing Nike's and rioting.


(Oh excuse me, I meant peacefully protesting)

I am a 60+ pretty well off retired white guy. If I want Nikes I will just go buy them. You guys and your mindless stereotypes are stupid.

 

[Smokin' OP]

"NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW"

The rest of us

Then why is the Trump cult sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, lawyers and politicians, even before a trial?
Insisting "Trump is innocent".
The Trump cult, doesn't want "LAWS" to come to fruition for their dear leader.

Did US attorney appointed by Trump, David Weiss, get ANY death threats when prosecuting Hunter Biden?
In 5 YEARS?

Guaranteed, he will be getting them now.

 

[scruffy]

I am a 60+ pretty well off retired white guy. If I want Nikes I will just go buy them. You guys and your mindless stereotypes are stupid.

You're WHITE? (gasp) You must be a racist. You must be the problem. Go ask Super, he'll tell you.

 

[scruffy]

Then why is the Trump cult sending death threats to judges, prosecutors, lawyers and politicians, even before a trial?
Insisting "Trump is innocent".

I don't know. Why did the leftards riot for 8 months? Mysteries of life.

 

[mak2]

You're WHITE? (gasp) You must be a racist. You must be the problem. Go ask Super, he'll tell you.

Why don't you go storm the Capital?

 

[scruffy]

Why don't you go storm the Capital?

Ha ha - you buyin?

That sounds like a pickup line, fella.

And, I'm kinda busy right now. Gnome sain?

 

[Smokin' OP]

I don't know. Why did the leftards riot for 8 months? Mysteries of life.

There you go, typical teabagger.........the "Whataboutism" defense.

 

[1srelluc]

Trump might have a case as it concerns the Equal Protection Clause given that the .gov is going after him while letting Hillary skate with the whole "no reasonable prosecutor" thing.

 

[scruffy]

There you go, typical teabagger.........the "Whataboutism" defense.

World's most retarded comeback.

Refer to post #58, shit for brains.

 

[luiza]

" Its my Party" by Lesley Gore is required .

 

[Smokin' OP]

World's most retarded comeback.

Refer to post #58, shit for brains.

World's most retarded "Commentary" from a retarded teabagger.....(as if there is any other kind)