montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,107
- 280
Of course the Zionists don't read the source documents. It debunks the propaganda and myths. LOL
Should I post a 500 page magazine minus the index and ask you to search for a relevant page or paragraph?
You are being Intellectually dishonest.
You are reduced to complaining about the presentation of the facts. The citation and the link to the original source document from an official archive is not enough. You are accustomed to Zionist propaganda sites that present the falsehoods and propaganda in simple language you can understand and follow. I get it.
Ok, I'll play your little game.
I posted the last page of the report and the title of document.
Of course, I realize that is a terrific number of words for you. So, here are the key sentences. The sentences are in section X. Trans-Jordania, last page of the complete Report.
"X.--TRANS-JORDANIA.
Included in the area of the Palestine Mandate is the territory of Trans-Jordania.
When Palestine west of the Jordan was occupied by the British Army and placed under a British military administration, over Trans-Jordania and a large part of Syria there was established an Arab administration, with its capital at Damascus. The ruler was His Highness the Emir Feisal, the third son of H.M. King Hussein, the King of the Hejaz. When Damascus was occupied by French troops in July, 1920, and the Emir Feisal withdrew, it was necessary to adopt fresh measures in Trans-Jordania."
Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations/Balfour Declaration text (30 July 1921)
You are posting a pre-WWII document?
Are you high?
Are you Tinmore?
No problem...
I'll post Kings I & II and we'll kick all the Jordanians into Jordan.
Trans-Jordania, and its status, is the subject of Boston's claim, its status was established in 1920. Try to follow the thread.
I do; we have already established that you can't differentiate between a suggestion and an order.
I presume you failed the Bar in that section.
That's rich from someone when presented with a Judgement of the Israeli Supreme Court, first claims it is an opinion, then when forced to admit it was a Judgement, claims it is "wishy-washy". You are a hoot.