CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 163,169
- 89,819
- 2,645
Maybe many of them shouldnt have helped Iran
They can get fucked
Take your meds
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe many of them shouldnt have helped Iran
They can get fucked
Between MAGA and the Mullahs, I'll pick the Mullahs.You want side with the Mullahs go join them. Dont get between us if we throw down troll
Trump it’s time to georgephilip or get off the pot
Im sure you would AhmedBetween MAGA and the Mullahs, I'll pick the Mullahs.
The W54 warhead used on the Davy Crockett weighed just 51 pounds and was the smallest and lightest fission bomb (implosion type) ever deployed by the United States, with a variable explosive yield of 0.01 kilotons (equivalent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as powerful as the ammonium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995),How many times do you have to be told that nukes are big and heavy?
You should come visit the museum where I volunteer. We have a mockup of your favorite Davy Crockett on display. You could move it with a small forklift, but it only has a yield big enough to guarantee to kill whomsoever is shooting it along with your target. That's why they were withdrawn from service after a short period. It was a suicide weapon at best and really didn't do a whole lot of damage. It had a danger blast zone of a 2-mile radius but only a 1.5-mile range.
The warhead weighed 51 pounds but how much did the rocket and stand weigh? If you saw it in real life you would not be so easily impressed. It would take two men and a small boy to carry it and not very far at that! You see three men in the picture!The W54 warhead used on the Davy Crockett weighed just 51 pounds and was the smallest and lightest fission bomb (implosion type) ever deployed by the United States, with a variable explosive yield of 0.01 kilotons (equivalent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as powerful as the ammonium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995),
View attachment 1265182
Youre referring to the M29 155mm recoilless rifle which was fried from a truck. That was the larger version.
Think what 5 suicide bombers could do in Wash DC.
What stand. Its goin=g to be walked in. The point is a nuke weighing 50 pounds can easily be made that fits in a back pack. Suicide bombers are a dime a dozen. Just walk up to the White House or Capital and boom its gone. Two in front of the pentagon and its gone. CIA FBI buildings all gone.The warhead weighed 51 pounds but how much did the rocket and stand weigh? If you saw it in real life you would not be so easily impressed. It would take two men and a small boy to carry it and not very far at that! You see three men in the picture!
You do realize that the weapon is armed by the motion of firing it and not with some type of switch, right? IOW, no rocket launch, no go boom! You just can't set it off in your hands.
Self Idolatry???Is this supposed to be an unhappy white child?
I think blacks laugh loudly for the same reason they over-celebrate in the end zone. Same reason they buy big gold necklaces. They have this need to call attention to themselves. But why?
Vietnam doesnt dispute the numbers, sooo...No, I'm not under that impression. As I've already posted, the numbers you mentioned may or may not be accurate. I am no authority on numbers. I know from personal experience that the Pentagon is notoriously dishonest. The entire federal government is notoriously dishonest.

Because they can rebuild things that are broken, obviously.but but donny said their nukes were already done for..... sooooooo why hit them again?
Do you have any idea of the technology that goes into creating a weapon that small? Obviously you don't have any hard science background. Iran would be at least 20 years from doing that, and there is no indication that any other country other than the US, Russia or China could do that even today. Maybe France could and I have my doubts about China. Their nuke missiles are all essentially Russian knockoffs.What stand. Its goin=g to be walked in. The point is a nuke weighing 50 pounds can easily be made that fits in a back pack. Suicide bombers are a dime a dozen. Just walk up to the White House or Capital and boom its gone. Two in front of the pentagon and its gone. CIA FBI buildings all gone.
There is no way to stop it. Unless we stop them now.
It was 1957 and they could do it.Do you have any idea of the technology that goes into creating a weapon that small? Obviously you don't have any hard science background. Iran would be at least 20 years from doing that, and there is no indication that any other country other than the US, Russia or China could do that even today. Maybe France could and I have my doubts about China. Their nuke missiles are all essentially Russian knockoffs.
I Dont care what they Hate anymore.If Trump continues to wage war against Iran, the left hates him. If he pulls out of Iran, the left hates him.
You want to arm Iran with nikes because that would a defeat for trumpMake it happen??? How is he gonna "make it happen" ? He can't even make his ballroom happen. He fucked up big time. There is no way the the USA is going to come out of this in a better position in relation to Iran .
It was Cold War being fought on a different map.
The real powers trying to hurt the others using Vietnamese as cannon fodder.
Emboldened by the Loser Left Cult drug addicts.
There is a difference between having a nuke (which was not a claim that was made for the attack on that vile regime) and seeking the ability to make some nukes.