It's o.k. that the government breaks the law because no one will do anything about it.

Wintw

Silver Member
Jul 31, 2016
644
118
90
It is o.k. that the government breaks the law because no one will do anything about it. Right?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Why would it be up to me? Why would you deflect the issue in order to blame me for acknowledging what is going on and addressing it? Are you a bully?
 
Politicians don't really have to prosecute one of their friends when they break the law or allow some emails to go missing but everyone else gets the gas chamber.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
So you think it is best everyone just bends over and grab their ankles, shut the fuck up, die, and surrender. OR do you think people should do what is necessary to defend and bring forth freedom and capitalism?
 
So you think it is best everyone just bends over and grab their ankles, shut the fuck up, die, and surrender. OR do you think people should do what is necessary to defend and bring forth freedom and capitalism?

The problem with shooting politicians in the head is that another one will just take their place. There isn't enough ammo to take care of them all.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
So the Revolutionary War either did not happen or you do not think it was worth it?
 
Refusing to discuss the topic of your own thread isn't cool, you know. It borders on spamming. It is spamming, if you do it often enough.

So, what law are you referring to that the government is supposedly breaking?
 
Wow. Mamooth. You think one law has been broken?! Are you illiterate the original post?! OR are you trying to deflect the issue in some manner?
 
Wow. Mamooth. You think one law has been broken?! Are you illiterate the original post?! OR are you trying to deflect the issue in some manner?

I think he's asking you to explain what the fuck you're talking about, specifically.

You don't seem to be very good with specifics, or being able to provide sources for your claims.
 
The original post is specific enough to be relevant of the highest order. You are trying to disregard the message by attacking the messenger.
 
The original post is specific enough to be relevant of the highest order. You are trying to disregard the message by attacking the messenger.

:lol:

No, it's not. Your OP is a single vague sentence. There is nothing "specific" about it. Nor is there anything the slightest bit "relevant".

There is no message to "disregard".

You seem to be incapable of telling us what law you're referring to in your OP. Until you do, this is nothing more than a troll thread.
 
An over reaching government that does not follow the rule of law is "vague" and "irrelevant"?! You are not a part of the problem are you? Why would you attack that idea and fact and not defend a limited government?
 
So you think it is best everyone just bends over and grab their ankles, shut the fuck up, die, and surrender. OR do you think people should do what is necessary to defend and bring forth freedom and capitalism?

The problem with shooting politicians in the head is that another one will just take their place. There isn't enough ammo to take care of them all.


What an ignorant thing to say online, or anywhere really.
 
An over reaching government that does not follow the rule of law is "vague" and "irrelevant"?! You are not a part of the problem are you? Why would you attack that idea and fact and not defend a limited government?

You don't seem to understand how this works.

If you want to have an adult conversation, you have to provide an actual topic to discuss.
 
That is an actual topic and exemplifies why this country is in the situation at hand that you feel the need to attack, dismiss, and demonize it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top