It's Mueller Time!

[jc456]

Your Freak Show was a Failure.

Even Nadler admitted he didn’t care about the truth but was just doing this to try to sway the public opinion towards impeachment.

It’s not going to happen DOTARD.

Nadler and Schiff’s sexual attraction to each other withstanding, there was nothing interesting st all about this charade.

Starr was operating under a different statute, dope. He was creating a report for public release. Mueller was creating a report for the AG.

And being That Mueller thought his report would never be Public, then he had no Reason at all to NOT list The Crimes he thought Trump should be recommended for Indictment, like Starr listed the 13 crimes he recommended Clinton be indicted for.

But Mueller listed Zero. He recommended ZERO crimes to indict The President with.

Go back to ramming that Putin Bobblehead up your ass.

You may as well accomplish 1 thing today, because you are failing at everything else.

This went so bad for you today, Your Communist Party Leaders are cancelling their meetings today to discuss Mueller's bumbling testimony.

Throw in the towel already.

You'll get further working with the president the next 5 years than fighting him.

Mueller has explained his reasons multiple times, dope.

not once, won't mention that dossier he had put in the report. so you're grossly mistaken. thanks.

I wasn't speaking of any dossier, dope.

I think Mueller was in Hospice care during the last two plus years. He wasn’t investigating trump

 

[Deno]

Typical rino Tard

How typical of you to start the name calling. It really goes to show your true color and personality. Lol

I was talking about mumbling mueller not you...…..

 

[easyt65]

Against, why don't you read the report for yourself. Thats not what it says.

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

its not there job its not a legal standard either they find the evidence a crime was committed or they don't and they didn't

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime" is not the same as "we reached a determination that the president did not commit a crime". There are important differences in those two statements.

Prosecutor talk of he is innocent. Prosecutors need evidence to proceed with indictments. They didn’t have enough.

They didn't have ANY.

 

[Mortis]

Former special counsel Robert Mueller said Wednesday that he was “not familiar” with Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that commissioned the Steele dossier.

Mueller revealed his surprising lack of familiarity with the firm during an exchange with Ohio Rep. Steve Chabot, a Republican member of the House Judiciary Committee.

“When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele reporting, the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS, is that correct?” Chabot asked.

“I’m not familiar with that,” said Mueller, while scouring through his 448-page report of the Russia probe.

The Barr/Durham investigation is new. It started after Mueller’s investigation was completed. Is the special counsel seriously making the claim he didn’t look into Fusion GPS or the Steele dossier because he knew, via some future telling power, that it would later be subject of a DOJ investigation by an AG who wasn’t even appointed yet?

Let’s also note that Mueller spent much of his time going after Paul Manafort for crimes that occurred years earlier, had nothing to do with Russia, and had no connection to the 2016 election. Yet, he found those “within his purview” while a document and agency (Fusion GPS) that formed the basis of the conspiracy claims were found to not be not in his purview. Does that make sense to anyone? It shouldn’t.

This is a total cluster. Mueller was clearly, as I speculated last night, a figurehead. He doesn’t even know what’s in his own report, as streiff pointed out earlier in a piece. This guy is absolutely clueless and that led to rabid partisans like Andrew Weissmann running wild, making baseless accusations and insinuations against DOJ policy. Much of the report doesn’t even appear to have been approved by Mueller outside of rubber stamping.

Today, Mueller’s investigation was exposed for exactly what it is and that’s a good thing.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won

You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.

Except it does and after listening to Bob today, I am curious who actually wrote it. Embarrassing.

How can you know what it says if you haven't read it?

I read portions of it. Frankly not interested in 400+ pages of boredom.

Then how can you speak knowledgeably about it?

Same way I can do so about the NE Patriots. I know Enough to be dangerous. I am Not a football expert but I watch enough plays and games to opine.

 

[Crepitus]

How much more do you need?

• 126 meetings? Nothing that shows Trump conspired to affect the election.
• Flynn lied? About making money with Turkey. Nothing that showed that Trump conspired with Russia on anything affecting the election.
• Manafort lied? On old, unrelated things that had nothing to do with the Russia investigation.
• Gates lied? Lied about what again?
• Papadapolis lied? And how did Mueller collect the information?
• Cohen lied? So a liar lied about lying but you are using him as a witness for the truth?
• All intelligence agencies agreed that Russia favored Trump, you mean the agencies who themselves went to Russia, lied, and who actively sought to destroy Trump?
• Trump said he'd take dirt on Hillary from a foreign power, you mean just like Hillary and the DNC went to foreign powers to manufacture dirt against Trump proven false?

Meantime, democrats spent 8 hours today in a long string of lies, asking questions, then answering them themselves and coming to their own unsupported conclusions that NO ONE is above the law for nothing no matter how minor, except themselves of course and anyone supporting or connected to the DNC!

Did you not watch the testimony at all?

 

[MarathonMike]

Where's the left wing meltdown? Seems like the thread's mostly the usual whining and bitching trumpbots.

They are drowning their sorrows similar to the 2016 election, but not as severe. The Democrats fail so often they are starting to get conditioned to it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

They said there was not enough to prosecute. No conspiracy and no obstruction.

Against, why don't you read the report for yourself. Thats not what it says.

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

Even a special prosecutor may not exonerate. If I am charged with a crime the prosecutor argues a case and only the judge and or jury may exonerate.

This isn't a trial, it's an investigation.

But the same legal principles apply. Hence the name.. “special prosecutor”

 

[Crepitus]

Against, why don't you read the report for yourself. Thats not what it says.

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

its not there job its not a legal standard either they find the evidence a crime was committed or they don't and they didn't

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime" is not the same as "we reached a determination that the president did not commit a crime". There are important differences in those two statements.

Bwuhahahaha

'INNOCENT until proven guilty.'

The Democrats 'proved' the President is innocent...

This wasn't a trial.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

This isn't a trial, it's an investigation.

and he refused to answer any questions as to what the investigation revealed when they were about Democrat involvement.

If it were a trial, he would have been labeled a hostile witness at the very least, if not in contempt.

 

[easyt65]

When correcting his earlier testimony Mueller said. "I want to go back to one thing that was said this morning by Mr. Lieu, who said and I quote, ‘You didn’t charge the President because of the OLC opinion. That is not the correct way to say it. As we say in the report and as I said at the opening, we did not reach a determination as to whether the President committed a crime.”

But his findings state "... this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime..."

That certainly sounds like a determination.

You gotta post the whole quote kid:

“while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Mueller didn't lie to congress, but you sure as hell just tried to lie to us.

I'm curious, Crepitus. Can you watch Mueller's testimony and tell me that was the performance of an "honest" man? Claiming he didn't investigate Steele and Simpson's involvement in the Trump Tower meeting because it wasn't part of his job? How could it NOT be? He investigated the Trump Tower meeting! Why would THAT be something worthy of a thorough investigation but Glenn Simpson's meetings with the Russian lawyer the day before the meeting and the day after the meeting NOT be worthy of an investigation?

He was avoiding playing into the silly republican conspiracy theories. That's all.

Interesting...

So the Trump Tower meeting is something you obviously think should have been investigated since it's been cited repeatedly by those of you on the left as "proof" that the Trump Campaign conspired with Russia...correct?

But you DON'T think that Glenn Simpson meeting with the Russian lawyer the day before the Trump Tower meeting and the day after the meeting should have been investigated as well?

How do you manage that? How can you justify investigating what took place at a meeting...but not investigate who was behind the meeting taking place in the first place? Aren't you curious as to what it was that Glenn Simpson spoke to the Russian lawyer about?

It was. He's already testified. They released transcripts back in January I think. I know it's a popular conspiracy theory among conservatives, but it's already been looked at a passed on.

Mueller had no idea who Simpson was or who Fusion GPS was...

So WHO passed on it? Comey? Weismann? Hillary's lawyer?

Comey / the FBI exonerated HER before interviewing her...

 

[Crepitus]

Against, why don't you read the report for yourself. Thats not what it says.

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

its not there job its not a legal standard either they find the evidence a crime was committed or they don't and they didn't

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime" is not the same as "we reached a determination that the president did not commit a crime". There are important differences in those two statements.

Prosecutor talk of he is innocent. Prosecutors need evidence to proceed with indictments. They didn’t have enough.

No. The first sentence means they did not make a decision. The second, which has not been spoken by Mueller or his investigators, would mean he didn't commit a crime.

Words have meanings.

 

[Crepitus]

Nothing to be done as long as the Senate is packed with McConnell's meatpuppets.

Why?

Republicans looked much smarter than their counterparts. Sorry.

According to you? I would expect so. Bias does that kinda thing. The Democrats looked better to me.

Nothing to be done as long as the Senate is packed with McConnell's meatpuppets.

Why?

Republicans looked much smarter than their counterparts. Sorry.

According to you? I would expect so. Bias does that kinda thing. The Democrats looked better to me.

Come on man. No way. Even CNN and MSNBC disagree with you.

I don't let commentators make my judgements for me, and besides from the little I heard from CNN, it's not even true. I listened to most of the testimony while driving on NPR, and the Democrats, while somewhat stymied by Mueller's lack muster performance, made clear points while the republicans either tried to discredit him or pushed their own pet conspiracy theories.

Polls agree with me. Even the Dems in those polls. Sorry, Crep.

Post them up. Not faux news either.

 

[easyt65]

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

its not there job its not a legal standard either they find the evidence a crime was committed or they don't and they didn't

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime" is not the same as "we reached a determination that the president did not commit a crime". There are important differences in those two statements.

Bwuhahahaha

'INNOCENT until proven guilty.'

The Democrats 'proved' the President is innocent...

This wasn't a trial.

Investigation - INNOCENT until proven guilty.

It wasn't a trial because they did not even find enough evidence to make it that far!

Bwuhahahaha

 

[Crepitus]

You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.

Except it does and after listening to Bob today, I am curious who actually wrote it. Embarrassing.

How can you know what it says if you haven't read it?

I read portions of it. Frankly not interested in 400+ pages of boredom.

Then how can you speak knowledgeably about it?

Same way I can do so about the NE Patriots. I know Enough to be dangerous. I am Not a football expert but I watch enough plays and games to opine.

Don't you think it's just slightly more important to be educated on this?

 

[Billy000]

Obstruction is an impeachable offense. The only victory you spineless turds have is that the republican senate are too much of pussies to indict Trump. That’s all you have.

You should talk.

The Dems had many chances to IMPEACH him. So, what do they have now?

NOTHING.

Because I just told you asshat. They won’t impeach him because they know it would be a waste of time because the senate must indict him.

Oh and what would the Congress impeach the president again for? Wasn't the Mueller report about Russian Collusion?

Mueller Report Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion

Biden Says Russian Interference Wouldn’t Have Happened On His Watch. It Did

Somebody here is lying....Can you guess which one?

Lol Robert from the beginning found collusion of those in Trump’s orbit but not Trump himself. Of course the real charge is obstruction of justice.

No, obstruction of justice very much is a crime. I hate to break it to you.

 

[Rustic]

You should talk.

The Dems had many chances to IMPEACH him. So, what do they have now?

NOTHING.

Because I just told you asshat. They won’t impeach him because they know it would be a waste of time because the senate must indict him.

Oh and what would the Congress impeach the president again for? Wasn't the Mueller report about Russian Collusion?

Mueller Report Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion

Biden Says Russian Interference Wouldn’t Have Happened On His Watch. It Did

Somebody here is lying....Can you guess which one?

Lol Robert from the beginning found collusion of those in Trump’s orbit but not Trump himself. Of course the real charge is obstruction of justice.

No, obstruction of justice very much is a crime. I hate to break it to you.

... and still no Russian connection

 

[skye]

How much more do you need?

• 126 meetings? Nothing that shows Trump conspired to affect the election.
• Flynn lied? About making money with Turkey. Nothing that showed that Trump conspired with Russia on anything affecting the election.
• Manafort lied? On old, unrelated things that had nothing to do with the Russia investigation.
• Gates lied? Lied about what again?
• Papadapolis lied? And how did Mueller collect the information?
• Cohen lied? So a liar lied about lying but you are using him as a witness for the truth?
• All intelligence agencies agreed that Russia favored Trump, you mean the agencies who themselves went to Russia, lied, and who actively sought to destroy Trump?
• Trump said he'd take dirt on Hillary from a foreign power, you mean just like Hillary and the DNC went to foreign powers to manufacture dirt against Trump proven false?

Meantime, democrats spent 8 hours today in a long string of lies, asking questions, then answering them themselves and coming to their own unsupported conclusions that NO ONE is above the law for nothing no matter how minor, except themselves of course and anyone supporting or connected to the DNC!

Did you not watch the testimony at all?

sure we did!

this is what we got from it!

 

[Crepitus]

Mueller is a prosecutor he cannot exonerate

In his role as Special Counsel he was not a prosecutor primarily. He took pains to say the report did not exonerate tRump.

its not there job its not a legal standard either they find the evidence a crime was committed or they don't and they didn't

Mueller
"we did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime,”

game over

We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime" is not the same as "we reached a determination that the president did not commit a crime". There are important differences in those two statements.

Prosecutor talk of he is innocent. Prosecutors need evidence to proceed with indictments. They didn’t have enough.

They didn't have ANY.

Your kidding, right?

 

[toobfreak]

How much more do you need?

• 126 meetings? Nothing that shows Trump conspired to affect the election.
• Flynn lied? About making money with Turkey. Nothing that showed that Trump conspired with Russia on anything affecting the election.
• Manafort lied? On old, unrelated things that had nothing to do with the Russia investigation.
• Gates lied? Lied about what again?
• Papadapolis lied? And how did Mueller collect the information?
• Cohen lied? So a liar lied about lying but you are using him as a witness for the truth?
• All intelligence agencies agreed that Russia favored Trump, you mean the agencies who themselves went to Russia, lied, and who actively sought to destroy Trump?
• Trump said he'd take dirt on Hillary from a foreign power, you mean just like Hillary and the DNC went to foreign powers to manufacture dirt against Trump proven false?

Meantime, democrats spent 8 hours today in a long string of lies, asking questions, then answering them themselves and coming to their own unsupported conclusions that NO ONE is above the law for nothing no matter how minor, except themselves of course and anyone supporting or connected to the DNC!

Did you not watch the testimony at all?

You sticking with that? I watched it live end to end and have every minute saved. In a few days I will give a comprehensive digest of what was actually said and accomplished. Keep your diaper on.