It's Mueller Time!

[Mortis]

Yet it was never followed through, and Mueller never posted a Prosecution charge about it over 2 years later.

It's not even the job of the Special Counsel to "prosecute". He is not a Prosecutor to begin with.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

1) Trump commuted an obstructive act when he ordered Don McGahn to fire the special counsel.


2) The obstruction act was connected to an official proceeding.

3) The act was carried out with corrupt intent.


With precision, Rep. Jeffries ticks through the three elements proving obstruction of justice


Seems clear to me

True.

And the American people must respond by voting Trump and Pence out of office next year.

They won't...and you loons will bawl for another four

 

[ph3iron]

LOL Mueller destroyed.

Poor Commiecrats, left eating another nothing burger.

By our fat orange vagina grabber?
Anyone else they would be in jail

 

[Rustic]

Mueller comes across as an blithering idiot... lol

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Cannot obstruct if there is not a crime.

 

[dannyboys]

Honestly it's like some smart lawyers have gone to a nursing home and are attempting to question a senile gummer sitting in the sun room.
Mullier is obviously senile..

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

And the American people must respond by voting Trump and Pence out of office next year.

Give us somebody better.

I am loyal to no one.



.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Dimms are begging Mueller to give them a reason to impeach for Obstruction.

This whole thing was about Trump and Putin rigging the election.

It didn’t ******* happen, but they want to get him on process crimes from a witch hunt....and the obstruction DIDNT HAPPEN. THERE WERE NO OBSTRUCTING ACTS COMMITTED BY TRUMP.

What soulless cvnts.

Obstruction of justice is a federal felony, dope.

There is no justice to obstruct on a presidential coup

WTF?.......

No one forced Trump to obstruct the investigation.

Mueller himself said his investigation was never obstructed in this very hearing.

So Cite Evidence and US CODE that Defines an Obstructive Act Committed by The President which Brought The Investigation to a Halt thereby obstructing it.

Did Putin tell you to type that?

Geez you people are just illiterate about the law.

No wonder you are DemTards.

Mueller himself said his investigation was never obstructed in this very hearing.

LOL...
Trump's failure to do so does not make it any less of a crime, dope.

What the **** are you talking about?

Cory Booker saying he wants to punch Trump in the face is a crime? Howso?

If Trump was guilty of obstruction, Mueller would have concluded it in the report...just as he concluded that Trump and Putin did not conspire to rig the election.

 

[bodecea]

Robert Mueller's day of disappointments for Democrats. Robert Mueller's day of disappointments for Democrats

These poor Democrats really thought Mueller was going to undo their loss.

That's the talking point for the Right.....Been watching, hardly disappointing.

 

[The Original Tree]

Obstructing justice of a charge that never happened is impossible

But keep this quiet because fat nadler is in charge of trumps campaign, he just does not know this

Obstructing justice of a charge that never happened is impossible

A charge is not what's obstructed. The investigation is what's obstructed.

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

What was bogus about the investigation in to the Russians interfering?

The premise Trump had anything to do with it.

121 verified contacts between the Trump Campaign and the very Russians interfering in our election, where as no other presidential candidate, has had any contacts with any Russians trying to help them, during their presidential runs.

It was unAmerican to do such, so OF COURSE the Trump campaign came under suspicion of being a witting or unwitting asset, of the Russians.

It's unAmerican for you to be talking about Non Existent, Never Occurred Russian Collusion like it did occur.

It's not like Trump paid Russia $13 Million to create a Dirty Clinton Dossier straight from The Kremlin for the sole purpose of using Russia Propaganda in a failed attempt to alter the outcome of our election

I mean, you lying bastards cheated and still lost. You spent $1.5 Billion and outspent Trump 10-1 and still lost.

You had The Lib Tard Media behind you pounding the pulpit like Hitler on a rampage extolling the virtues of the most callous and morally corrupt hag in history and you STILL LOST!

Sux to be you.

Elect Hillary Clinton to save The Fatherland and save us from The Orange Menace!

 

[Dragonlady]

I understand he himself was not involved much in the actual investigation. Seems he handed it off to those he appointed.

Mueller made it clear today: He did NOT appoint the investigators. The FBI transferred all but a handful of the investigators who he worked with to his office, including Strozc and Paige, both of whom he fired when he learned of the tweets, in August of 2017, less than 3 months after Mueller was hired. Of the half dozen he actually did hire, half were Republicans, and half were Democrats.

The Republicans didn't question Mueller, they testified about the origins of the investigation, and then asked Mueller to confirm or deny what they had said, knowing Mueller would refuse to answer any questions on this topic because it's under investigation by three different DOJ officials and he's not allowed to make any comment. FOX News now has sound clips about Mueller refusing to answer questions on the origins of the investigations. The clips will be placed on heavy rotation.

 

[Mortis]

And knees news wont?

Haven't seen any of yet on FoxNews.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Cannot obstruct if there is not a crime.

You can obstruct, even if there is not a crime, but you can't obstruct if you did not carry out the act alleged to be obstructive.

.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

A charge is not what's obstructed. The investigation is what's obstructed.

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

A charge is not what's obstructed. The investigation is what's obstructed.

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

An investigation into a bogus charge is

Facepalm........christ you dopes are dumb.

There is no charge during an investigation, dope.

You can not as a prosecutor release a 400 page damning report with no evidence just speculation and then not indict...Mueller has done to Trump what Comey did to Hillary.....spells out possible crimes but no evidence to indict?...that goes against our system and bastardizes justice...you libs used to be very concerned over such action....what happened?....

Nonsense. It was full of evidence. A sitting president cannot be indicted. He can however, be impeached with the same evidence.
A former president can certaily be indicted.

So why did The Special Counsel Investigating Bill Clinton cite 13 Crimes Bill Clinton Committed for which he could be indicted for and recommended he be indicted for them?

Mueller listed ZERO crimes that President Trump Committed.

You aren't playing here with a bunch of Ignorant Imbeciles who do not know the law or history, so your lies fall short, and are every much of a failure as is Mueller's testimony today.

You are either an imbecile or a pathological partisan liar.

I think both.

That means nothing.

 

[jc456]

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

An investigation into a bogus charge is illegal

An investigation into a bogus charge is

Facepalm........christ you dopes are dumb.

There is no charge during an investigation, dope.

There has to be a charge of a criminal act that may have occurred to even have a special counsel appointed.

What Crime was Mueller Appointed to Investigate?

WTF?
No charge is required in any way to initiate an investigation.

The reasons for appointing a SC were given at the time of his appointment, dope.

Not True at all. There has to be Evidence of a Crime. The evidence of that crime or the suggestion of a High Crime or Misdemeanor being committed, must be cited to justify the appointment of a Special Counsel. That is the sole purpose of a Special Counsel.

Yet no alleged crime was cited. They simply went in search of a crime, which is very Russian Like, and is in conflict with the laws, statutes and policies outlining the creation and appointment of a special counsel.

The Soviet Union called and wants their Cold War back.

Obama answered that call, and it was Putin on the other line, running The Obama DOJ and FBI.

Shameful.

Some call that treason.

The Democrat Party just calls that a day at the office.

Not True at all. There has to be Evidence of a Crime.

Nope.

but it has to be a valid investigation! it wasn't, the mere fact he didn't find russia interference. He didn't say how they did it, so therefore it didn't happen.

 

[Crixus]

Trump
View attachment 270746


Dems

That sums it all up. Miller was useless.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Did anybody see this?

"Rep. Jeffries ticks through the necessary elements to prove obstruction of justice charges and concludes by arguing Trump's conduct satisfied them. (Mueller notes that Jeffries's analysis isn't "out of the ballpark" but says he doesn't necessarily agree with it.)"

.

 

[Rambunctious]

Whoa....Dems meeting in Nadler's office on whether they should cancel afternoon hearing with pencil necks group...wonder why....

 

[Oddball]

HEY MUELLER!

 

[Rambunctious]

Mother of all backfires...even CNN can't spin this effectively...