Its Looking like Mark Meadows will Rat

[Clipper]

It was the waning days of the Trump Administration. He need not have been in the room when Trump issued that order.

You’re very slow.

He was taking a leak when The Ape gave the order, right genius?

 

[toobfreak]

not when he corroborates the evidence.
Thats the problem he knows where the bodies are burried and can dig them up and hand them to prosecutors

Dream on, Flyboi.

 

[BackAgain]

He was taking a leak when The Ape gave the order, right genius?

You don’t even know if he was at the WH at all that day, you complete fucking imbecile.

 

[Clipper]

You don’t even know if he was at the WH at all that day, you complete fucking imbecile.

You mad, Cuz?

Imagine how pissed you'll be when Meadows takes the stand against The Ape in an orange jumpsuit.

 

[BackAgain]

You mad, Cuz?

No. You?

Imagine how pissed you'll be when Meadows takes the stand against The Ape in an orange jumpsuit.

Matins how crushed you’ll be upon the dismissal of these cases not an acquittal. Or a reversal of any conviction on appeal.

Man. That must gnaw at an unjust critter like you.

 

[odanny]

It is of course mind boggling why anyone would want to be associated with a sleazeball like Trump, but the thought of someone taking the fall for that spray tanned assclown is too much to consider.

 

[The Banker]

It is of course mind boggling why anyone would want to be associated with a sleazeball like Trump, but the thought of someone taking the fall for that spray tanned assclown is too much to consider.

everybody around Trump is going down.

Trump threw Pence under the bus because Pence would not be apart of Trump's crime.

If you refuse to break the law for Trump, he attacks you.

 

[Billiejeens]

When I see banker providing insights ... I know the opposite is most likely true.

Thanks banker for the vote of confidence in something being untrue!

There is no greater indicator.
All hail The Barker.

 

[Billiejeens]

Hey crap. You’re still babbling like a retarded gibbon.

It literally never stops with that 1.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

He need not have been in the room when Trump issued that order.

What order? To whom? When was “that order” issued?
Trump never issued any such order to anyone!

It was all done “in his mind” — remember?

 

[Thinker101]

What order? To whom? When was “that order” issued?
Trump never issued any such order to anyone!

It was all done “in his mind” — remember?

You want to know what order, you want to know to whom, you want to know when. Then you state an order was not issued to anyone...dang, you must be one of them liberal loons.

 

[BackAgain]

What order? To whom? When was “that order” issued?
Trump never issued any such order to anyone!

It was all done “in his mind” — remember?

False; you ignorant dolt.

One of the things he said was that he “could” even do it by merely thinking it.

He did not then (or ever) claim that this is what he did in this instance.

Buy a clue.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

False; you ignorant dolt.

One of the things he said was that he “could” even do it by merely thinking it.

He did not then (or ever) claim that this is what he did in this instance.

Buy a clue.

Then what does Trump claim? Did he ever announce who he issued the order to? He certainly will have a chance to explain all this in the trial!

 

[Orangecat]

Mark Meadows is a criminal, but he can't do time.
People close to these indictments are suggesting Mark Meadows will rat and tell all to avoid the time.

Meadows was right there for all of the crimes, corruption, insurrections, and lies about election fraud and the fake electors crime and break in to the GA voting facility. If Mark Meadows talks it will further corroborate the already substantial and credible and evidence burying Trump.

The evidence against Trump is good enough they don't need Meadows, but if he flips it will be devastating for Trump.

Keep in mind Trump tried desperately to keep Meadows from testifying, because Mark knows where all the bodies are buried.

Meadows trying to avoid testifying in Georgia election probe

Mark Meadows, former White House chief of staff, is trying to avoid having to testify before a Georgia special grand jury that’s investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and his allies illegally tried to influence the state’s 2020 election.

apnews.com

Team Trump Suspects His Former Chief of Staff Is a 'Rat'

Trump is sending his attorneys and allies on 'fact-finding' missions about what Mark Meadows is up to. They've returned with no firm answers.

www.rollingstone.com

There's nothing to rat about. I guess he could lie.

 

[Orangecat]

Then what does Trump claim? Did he ever announce who he issued the order to?

Is there someone the POTUS has to tell? Why?

 

[BackAgain]

Then what does Trump claim? Did he ever announce who he issued the order to? He certainly will have a chance to explain all this in the trial!

You ask questions here but didn’t bother to seek them outside this little board?

He won’t explain ahit at trial. Nor will he need to.

The special persecutor carries the burden of proof. I have no idea how he will refute it when it is attested to by a one of Trump’s people who was there at the time. And it will indeed be the burden of the persecution to disprove it once raised — and beyond a reasonable doubt at that.

Laughable case.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

You ask questions here but didn’t bother to seek them outside this little board?

He won’t explain ahit at trial. Nor will he need to.

The special persecutor carries the burden of proof. I have no idea how he will refute it when it is attested to by a one of Trump’s people who was there at the time. And it will indeed be the burden of the persecution to disprove it once raised — and beyond a reasonable doubt at that.

Laughable case.

True about the burden of proof.

Probably true that Trump won’t be able or even try to “explain [all his] shit” at trial.

It is a laughable case. I’m certainly laughing at Trump’s ever more ridiculous lies and legal conundrums — though it is very sad that Trump has, through his own actions, put our country through this nightmare of division.

I am, as usual, also laughing at the pathetic arguments you use to defend your loyalty to this egomaniacal showman.

 

[sealybobo]

Mark Meadows is a criminal, but he can't do time.
People close to these indictments are suggesting Mark Meadows will rat and tell all to avoid the time.

Meadows was right there for all of the crimes, corruption, insurrections, and lies about election fraud and the fake electors crime and break in to the GA voting facility. If Mark Meadows talks it will further corroborate the already substantial and credible and evidence burying Trump.

The evidence against Trump is good enough they don't need Meadows, but if he flips it will be devastating for Trump.

Keep in mind Trump tried desperately to keep Meadows from testifying, because Mark knows where all the bodies are buried.

Meadows trying to avoid testifying in Georgia election probe

Mark Meadows, former White House chief of staff, is trying to avoid having to testify before a Georgia special grand jury that’s investigating whether then-President Donald Trump and his allies illegally tried to influence the state’s 2020 election.

apnews.com

Team Trump Suspects His Former Chief of Staff Is a 'Rat'

Trump is sending his attorneys and allies on 'fact-finding' missions about what Mark Meadows is up to. They've returned with no firm answers.

www.rollingstone.com

“You don’t give Mark Meadows immunity,” the former governor said, “unless the evidence he has is unimpeachable.”

Christie says Trump will be convicted in slew of legal battles: ‘It’s over’

Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie predicted Tuesday morning that former President Trump will be convicted in one of his legal cases, claiming “it’s over” for Trump.…

thehill.com

 

[The Banker]

“You don’t give Mark Meadows immunity,” the former governor said, “unless the evidence he has is unimpeachable.”

Christie says Trump will be convicted in slew of legal battles: ‘It’s over’

Republican presidential candidate Chris Christie predicted Tuesday morning that former President Trump will be convicted in one of his legal cases, claiming “it’s over” for Trump.…

thehill.com

Trump has committed so many crimes and there is so much string evidence against him including numerous rats, lining up to testify against him in court and reveal what we all know. They told Trump repeatedly there was no election fraud and no evidence of fraud at all. On top of that Meadows knows all about Trump's grand and illegal fake electors scheme and his scheme to break into the GA election data building. And this is just 1 of many extremely serious cases.

The Trump problems are only just beginning, and the evidence against Trump is so devastating!