Rigby5
Diamond Member
Exactly, the easiest fix is to raise the cap or even eliminate it!
MAGA
I do not understand why any income was ever exempt from SS pay-ins.
There never should have been a cap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly, the easiest fix is to raise the cap or even eliminate it!
MAGA
Population decreases after boomers assures depletion will not occurWe know the swamp creatures stole money from SS and never repaid it. However, you pay in, you get back, you don't pay in, you get zip. It isn't that difficult. the other issue is the younger idiots don't get jobs that are supplying the stockpile with enough funds. At some point, the system will fall which is the way of every ponzi scheme. Eventually the out money exceeds the in money. Everyone is harmed. If you call people who work wealthy, well, that's incredible.
Do you do math? 2% of 10,000 is what?
So what you're attempting to misconstrue here is that an investment into SS doubles your money? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah holy fk are you derainged.That is not how you calculate it.
Interest compounds over time, and some of the funds are in there over 50 years.
The interest you earned the first year, starts adding its own interest the second year.
Over 50 years, the amount produced by interest is typically many times more than you put in.
Just double is a very modest amount.
We know the swamp creatures stole money from SS and never repaid it. However, you pay in, you get back, you don't pay in, you get zip. It isn't that difficult. the other issue is the younger idiots don't get jobs that are supplying the stockpile with enough funds. At some point, the system will fall which is the way of every ponzi scheme. Eventually the out money exceeds the in money. Everyone is harmed. If you call people who work wealthy, well, that's incredible.
So what you're attempting to misconstrue here is that an investment into SS doubles your money? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah holy fk are you derainged.
You mean spouses of workers who have died?The point of the program is to pay out to those who didn't pay in? not how I understand it.
I am sure it is a safe move for him in 2026 re-election bid.Is killing Social Security what he will run on, in his 2026 re-election bid?
You are correct that those who put in for 40 yesrs would have doubled. Obviously the last 10 do way less than the prior 30 but racist math for the dutiful provides the conclusionIt absolutely does.
The money you pay into SS is invested in the National Debt through government bonds, which pay 5%.
When people say SS is only paying 2%, that is the interest rate, not the total result.
Check it out yourself.
Compound Interest Calculator
If one time only, you pay in $1000 at 2% interest, after 50 years the result is:
{...
A = $2,716.02
A = P + I where
P (principal) = $1,000.00
I (interest) = $1,716.02
...}
Compounding interest always pays off many times more than you pay in, over time.
That's the first I've heard of it.I know of no one,whetherThere is nothing wrong with Social Security.
The shortfall will be short and temporary, and is from the big population surge of the boomers.
In 20 years it will be done, as we boomers will have died off.
The best solution would be just more immigration in order to increase pay-ins.
IOW, it’s a Ponzi scheme backed by government mandated participation. Something should be done.The problem is that all the new money coming in SS gets paid out as benefits.
So you didn’t pay inIOW, it’s a Ponzi scheme backed by government mandated participation. Something should be done.
Ok, you have nothing to offer except bsOf course not. All praise the Boomers.
Lets flip that. Eliminate retirement after 70. The money saved from defunding Boomer retirement will take care of the situation.
Harsh? Thats exactly what you just argued for the younger generations.
It does not matter if the "rate of return doesn't keep up with real inflation".
Social Security still saves us all trillions in the interest the national debt would incur for all of us, if not for being able to borrow the temporary SS surplus each year.
The point is that SS is not a ponzi scheme because it does pay out and is so modest in pay out that it is nothing at all like a ponzi scheme.
The plain facts are that people would not otherwise save for retirement, so then SS is an essential public service.
If not for SS, then we would also have to come up with trillions to support those who failed to invest in retirement on their own.
They lived with their families.“To appreciate what Social Security provides for older Americans, it’s useful to look back at the ways seniors built a nest egg — or, more accurately, how most of them didn’t — before the program was put in place in 1935 to help the country recover from the Great Depression.
So how did older Americans get by? Website Gobankingrates.com compiled a list of 16 things that served as a safety net for seniors before Social Security, though “safety net” doesn’t really apply to many of the options, which include panhandling, moving into almshouses or poorhouses, or simply dying impoverished, which was the fate that befell 1 in every 2 older Americans in the years after the 1929 stock market crash.”
Sounds grim.
Its not BS. You want to cut out all the generations behind you. They should cut you out.Ok, you have nothing to offer except bs
It the basis of my retirement and that of many others.
Add a pension or a 401 and you do well.
Without SS I’d be fucked and so would a LOT of people
IOW, it’s a Ponzi scheme backed by government mandated participation. Something should be done.