It Starts: London Muslim Mayor Bans Women In Advertisements

It seems like the feminist got influence over the mayor.

I like porn. That's not porn!
Yea the feminist
5358f5a683693.jpg
 
This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.


True Dat.

We would not be talking about something that hadn't happened. We are only talking about it because it has.

Oops, you missed the point.


Looks like you did, because it wouldn't have happened under a different administration.


By your logic, we wouldn't be talking about ISIS if they were Christian or Jewish, ignoring the fact that they would not be engaging in the same action, if so.

You are assuming that this is all about this guy not wanting any women exposing themselves in a risqué manner because he is Muslim, and has nothing to do with him trying to censor this type of thing from young girls who may be susceptible to body image issues. Your analogy of ISIS is wholly illogical. They are a terrorist organization, not the mayor of a major city....

I am not saying I agree with him, I am saying that others who are not Muzzies have made the same argument, and it is in fact a logical fallacy that if he makes the argument it is because he is Muslim.

This link might help you, or it may just confuse you more-

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/advertisings-toxic-effect-on-eating-and-body-image/


Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.

For that matter, buses in London actively recruit new Muslims with advertising. Shouldn't you adopt some liberal values here? This man is just fine with the government promoting Islam, while using his power to censor free speech. Any true liberal would want it the other way around -- the promotion of free speech and the separation of religion and politics.
 
It didn't take long for the Muslim Mayor to show his true colors, huh?

The original hope that he wasn't an Islamist has disappeared.

The worry now is that he will try to impose Muslim culture and may be even Sharia Law.

Slowly but surely Islam is creeping forward and imposing its will in the UK.

A dangerous precedent which could be the beginning of the end!

Not good.


What has happened to Lebanon since its inception as a Christian majority country should be a lesson to all.

You know what they say about those who refuse to learn from history being doomed to repeat it, though.
 
Is it true?

I know nothing of English law...

Does the UK's body of law permit such a ban?

Is the public transit system in London under the control of the Mayor?

Does he have the legal authority to make such a proclamation?
no, not true.
 
As I recall, we shamed Abercombie and Finch a few years back. It's just more of the Trump bandwagon of xenophobia. Personally, I'm not voting for the guy, though. (-:


"we"? Who is "we"?

The Muslim Brotherhood?
JFC.

Abercrombie & Fitch: Stop Making Teens Feel Worthless
The main difference here is that is a popular movemnt based on the people trying to force change rather than the government doing so through edict.

The two concepts are not similar. One is based on freedom and the other counter to it.
 
Damn, this is just so stupid. There are men who are better looking than I am. They are taller, better built, or endowed with bigger equipment. They have better hair, bigger muscles, slimmer waists, and more attractive complexions. Do I demand that only aging men with thinning hair and the beginnings of a beer belly be allowed on ads? No, of course not, and if I did,I would be mocked quite deservedly.

I honestly cannot believe how a person could be so stupid as to be completely unable to see through this most transparent Muslim ruse. Body shaming, indeed.

I have a word of advice to both men and women. If you are fat and unattractive, deal with it -- literally if you wish. maybe you can work on your personality, instead of running around whining that others look better than you while demanding they change everything they do to assuage your feelings of insecurity.

His point is about young girls who are especially prone to eating disorders. It may be a Muslim ruse, and frankly I would not want to live in a city whose mayor is a Muslim, or any city where a mayor makes this type of unilateral restriction. But you are condemning his decision based purely on the fact that he is Muslim. This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.
Bullshit.

We have conversation here all the time based on asinine politicians trying to ban things. Were you here for the soda ban? When the FDA started reviewing trans fats?
 
We have conversation here all the time based on asinine politicians trying to ban things. Were you here for the soda ban? When the FDA started reviewing trans fats?


I wasn't here, but I remember when John Ashcroft wanted to cover statues. Of course, back then the leftists mocked him instead of agreeing with him.

One standard for Christians -- no standard at all for Muslims.
 
This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.


True Dat.

We would not be talking about something that hadn't happened. We are only talking about it because it has.

Oops, you missed the point.


Looks like you did, because it wouldn't have happened under a different administration.


By your logic, we wouldn't be talking about ISIS if they were Christian or Jewish, ignoring the fact that they would not be engaging in the same action, if so.

You are assuming that this is all about this guy not wanting any women exposing themselves in a risqué manner because he is Muslim, and has nothing to do with him trying to censor this type of thing from young girls who may be susceptible to body image issues. Your analogy of ISIS is wholly illogical. They are a terrorist organization, not the mayor of a major city....

I am not saying I agree with him, I am saying that others who are not Muzzies have made the same argument, and it is in fact a logical fallacy that if he makes the argument it is because he is Muslim.

This link might help you, or it may just confuse you more-

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/advertisings-toxic-effect-on-eating-and-body-image/



I agree.

Normally the Muslim whack jobs are more blatant.

This is sketchy, but not the proof positive that this is a disaster.

There are OTHER issues that are better proof that large scale Third World Immigration is a mistake.

And will be more in the near future.
 
Hilarious how "liberals" on here support the Islamic rape culture and are afraid of sexy women. Hopefully they do not own any AR15's or have access to explosives.
 
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.

Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.

You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.
 
Hilarious how "liberals" on here support the Islamic rape culture and are afraid of sexy women. Hopefully they do not own any AR15's or have access to explosives.

I recently heard that one of them had an access to an AR15...
 
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.

Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.

You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.

Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!

Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
 
Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!

Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!

Yep, that's totally what I said...totally and 100%. It's not like I only addressed his motivations and not if the actual act was right or wrong, I mean only people with reading comprehension beyond that of a 1st or 2nd Grader would be able to discern that, and it's my mistake for assuming you were capable of such... amazing feats of intelligence.
 
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.

Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.

You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.

Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!

Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
not a free speech issue. dumbass.
 
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.

Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.

You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.

Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!

Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
not a free speech issue. dumbass.

Well it has some elements of free speech. But indeed, I was just pointing out that they want to ban everything they don't personally enjoy. It's the commie way of looking at things.
 
Islam has declared war on the west but the west doesn't know it yet. Europe is getting a wake up call though but our libs will take decades more and even then it might not sink in until gays are thrown off of the Freedom Tower.

Having spent most of the last year working in Europe, they are pretty clear over there that Muslims have declared war on them. It's the US that doesn't grasp it. Obama won't say the words.

Best Trump quote ever: The man (Obama) doesn't have a clue. And he was referring to this subject.

Now where Europe is messed up is they understand they are in a war, and they have no idea how to fight it ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top