Bassman007
Platinum Member
- Sep 10, 2015
- 6,995
- 1,209
- 1,095
- Banned
- #81
Yea the feministIt seems like the feminist got influence over the mayor.
I like porn. That's not porn!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea the feministIt seems like the feminist got influence over the mayor.
I like porn. That's not porn!
She can't be called a feminist if she can not speak for herself!!Yea the feministIt seems like the feminist got influence over the mayor.
I like porn. That's not porn!
This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.
True Dat.
We would not be talking about something that hadn't happened. We are only talking about it because it has.
Oops, you missed the point.
Looks like you did, because it wouldn't have happened under a different administration.
By your logic, we wouldn't be talking about ISIS if they were Christian or Jewish, ignoring the fact that they would not be engaging in the same action, if so.
You are assuming that this is all about this guy not wanting any women exposing themselves in a risqué manner because he is Muslim, and has nothing to do with him trying to censor this type of thing from young girls who may be susceptible to body image issues. Your analogy of ISIS is wholly illogical. They are a terrorist organization, not the mayor of a major city....
I am not saying I agree with him, I am saying that others who are not Muzzies have made the same argument, and it is in fact a logical fallacy that if he makes the argument it is because he is Muslim.
This link might help you, or it may just confuse you more-
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/advertisings-toxic-effect-on-eating-and-body-image/
It didn't take long for the Muslim Mayor to show his true colors, huh?
The original hope that he wasn't an Islamist has disappeared.
The worry now is that he will try to impose Muslim culture and may be even Sharia Law.
Slowly but surely Islam is creeping forward and imposing its will in the UK.
A dangerous precedent which could be the beginning of the end!
Not good.
no, not true.Is it true?
I know nothing of English law...
Does the UK's body of law permit such a ban?
Is the public transit system in London under the control of the Mayor?
Does he have the legal authority to make such a proclamation?
The main difference here is that is a popular movemnt based on the people trying to force change rather than the government doing so through edict.JFC.As I recall, we shamed Abercombie and Finch a few years back. It's just more of the Trump bandwagon of xenophobia. Personally, I'm not voting for the guy, though. (-:
"we"? Who is "we"?
The Muslim Brotherhood?
Abercrombie & Fitch: Stop Making Teens Feel Worthless
Bullshit.Damn, this is just so stupid. There are men who are better looking than I am. They are taller, better built, or endowed with bigger equipment. They have better hair, bigger muscles, slimmer waists, and more attractive complexions. Do I demand that only aging men with thinning hair and the beginnings of a beer belly be allowed on ads? No, of course not, and if I did,I would be mocked quite deservedly.
I honestly cannot believe how a person could be so stupid as to be completely unable to see through this most transparent Muslim ruse. Body shaming, indeed.
I have a word of advice to both men and women. If you are fat and unattractive, deal with it -- literally if you wish. maybe you can work on your personality, instead of running around whining that others look better than you while demanding they change everything they do to assuage your feelings of insecurity.
His point is about young girls who are especially prone to eating disorders. It may be a Muslim ruse, and frankly I would not want to live in a city whose mayor is a Muslim, or any city where a mayor makes this type of unilateral restriction. But you are condemning his decision based purely on the fact that he is Muslim. This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.
We have conversation here all the time based on asinine politicians trying to ban things. Were you here for the soda ban? When the FDA started reviewing trans fats?
This thread would not exist if he were Christian, Jewish, etc.
True Dat.
We would not be talking about something that hadn't happened. We are only talking about it because it has.
Oops, you missed the point.
Looks like you did, because it wouldn't have happened under a different administration.
By your logic, we wouldn't be talking about ISIS if they were Christian or Jewish, ignoring the fact that they would not be engaging in the same action, if so.
You are assuming that this is all about this guy not wanting any women exposing themselves in a risqué manner because he is Muslim, and has nothing to do with him trying to censor this type of thing from young girls who may be susceptible to body image issues. Your analogy of ISIS is wholly illogical. They are a terrorist organization, not the mayor of a major city....
I am not saying I agree with him, I am saying that others who are not Muzzies have made the same argument, and it is in fact a logical fallacy that if he makes the argument it is because he is Muslim.
This link might help you, or it may just confuse you more-
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/advertisings-toxic-effect-on-eating-and-body-image/
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.
Hilarious how "liberals" on here support the Islamic rape culture and are afraid of sexy women. Hopefully they do not own any AR15's or have access to explosives.
Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.
Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.
You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.
Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!
Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
not a free speech issue. dumbass.Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.
Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.
You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.
Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!
Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
not a free speech issue. dumbass.Steroids are just as dangerous for boys, but is he suggesting that all pics of bulked up men be outlawed in a similar fashion? No, of course not, and that is because the real reason has nothing to do with body image.
Dude, it's pretty obvious that negative body image doesn't effect little boys and men in general as badly as it does little girls and women. This is changing it would seem, but that doesn't change the fact the bigger deal here, THAT YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO FUCKING EVIDENCE AT ALL THAT HE'S DOING THIS FOR ANY OTHER REASON THEN THE ONE HE SAID HE'S DOING IT FOR.
You could just as easily say he's doing it because he's oid, and doesn't like seeing such things because it hurts his delicate old man sensibilities. It'd still be bullshit from your imagination based in no actual evidence...but hell, you don't seem to care anyway.
Free speech affects people negatively. BAN IT!
Welcome to the liberal way of thinking. Feelz before realz all the way!
Islam has declared war on the west but the west doesn't know it yet. Europe is getting a wake up call though but our libs will take decades more and even then it might not sink in until gays are thrown off of the Freedom Tower.
Couture by Jake